Accelerated system-reliability-based disaster resilience analysis for structural systems

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Taeyong Kim , Sang-ri Yi
{"title":"Accelerated system-reliability-based disaster resilience analysis for structural systems","authors":"Taeyong Kim ,&nbsp;Sang-ri Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.strusafe.2024.102479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Resilience has emerged as a crucial concept for evaluating structural performance under disasters because of its ability to extend beyond traditional risk assessments, accounting for a system’s ability to minimize disruptions and maintain functionality during recovery. To facilitate the holistic understanding of resilience performance in structural systems, a system-reliability-based disaster resilience analysis framework was developed. The framework describes resilience using three criteria: reliability (β), redundancy (π), and recoverability (γ), and the system’s internal resilience is evaluated by inspecting the characteristics of reliability and redundancy for different possible progressive failure modes. However, the practical application of this framework has been limited to complex structures with numerous sub-components, as it becomes intractable to evaluate the performances for all possible initial disruption scenarios. To bridge the gap between the theory and practical use, especially for evaluating reliability and redundancy, this study centers on the idea that the computational burden can be substantially alleviated by focusing on initial disruption scenarios that are practically significant. To achieve this research goal, we propose three methods to efficiently eliminate insignificant scenarios: the sequential search method, the <em>n</em>-ball sampling method, and the surrogate model-based adaptive sampling algorithm. Three numerical examples, including buildings and a bridge, are introduced to prove the applicability and efficiency of the proposed approaches. The findings of this study are expected to offer practical solutions to the challenges of assessing resilience performance in complex structural systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21978,"journal":{"name":"Structural Safety","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 102479"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Safety","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016747302400050X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resilience has emerged as a crucial concept for evaluating structural performance under disasters because of its ability to extend beyond traditional risk assessments, accounting for a system’s ability to minimize disruptions and maintain functionality during recovery. To facilitate the holistic understanding of resilience performance in structural systems, a system-reliability-based disaster resilience analysis framework was developed. The framework describes resilience using three criteria: reliability (β), redundancy (π), and recoverability (γ), and the system’s internal resilience is evaluated by inspecting the characteristics of reliability and redundancy for different possible progressive failure modes. However, the practical application of this framework has been limited to complex structures with numerous sub-components, as it becomes intractable to evaluate the performances for all possible initial disruption scenarios. To bridge the gap between the theory and practical use, especially for evaluating reliability and redundancy, this study centers on the idea that the computational burden can be substantially alleviated by focusing on initial disruption scenarios that are practically significant. To achieve this research goal, we propose three methods to efficiently eliminate insignificant scenarios: the sequential search method, the n-ball sampling method, and the surrogate model-based adaptive sampling algorithm. Three numerical examples, including buildings and a bridge, are introduced to prove the applicability and efficiency of the proposed approaches. The findings of this study are expected to offer practical solutions to the challenges of assessing resilience performance in complex structural systems.

基于系统可靠性的结构系统抗灾能力加速分析
抗灾能力已成为评估灾害下结构性能的一个重要概念,因为它能够超越传统的风险评估,考虑到系统在恢复期间最大限度地减少中断和保持功能的能力。为了便于全面了解结构系统的抗灾性能,我们开发了一个基于系统可靠性的抗灾分析框架。该框架使用可靠性(β)、冗余性(π)和可恢复性(γ)三个标准来描述抗灾能力,并通过检查不同可能的渐进失效模式下的可靠性和冗余性特征来评估系统的内部抗灾能力。然而,这一框架的实际应用仅限于具有众多子组件的复杂结构,因为要评估所有可能的初始破坏情况下的性能变得非常困难。为了缩小理论与实际应用之间的差距,特别是在评估可靠性和冗余性方面,本研究的核心思想是,通过关注具有实际意义的初始破坏情况,可以大大减轻计算负担。为了实现这一研究目标,我们提出了三种有效消除不重要情况的方法:顺序搜索法、n 球抽样法和基于代用模型的自适应抽样算法。为了证明所提方法的适用性和效率,我们引入了三个数值实例,包括建筑物和桥梁。本研究的结果有望为评估复杂结构系统的弹性性能所面临的挑战提供实用的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structural Safety
Structural Safety 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
8.60%
发文量
67
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Structural Safety is an international journal devoted to integrated risk assessment for a wide range of constructed facilities such as buildings, bridges, earth structures, offshore facilities, dams, lifelines and nuclear structural systems. Its purpose is to foster communication about risk and reliability among technical disciplines involved in design and construction, and to enhance the use of risk management in the constructed environment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信