Captación, selección y retención de profesionales sanitarios en entidades de gestión indirecta y de gestión privada. Informe SESPAS 2024

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Olga Pané Mena, Pau Gomar Sánchez
{"title":"Captación, selección y retención de profesionales sanitarios en entidades de gestión indirecta y de gestión privada. Informe SESPAS 2024","authors":"Olga Pané Mena,&nbsp;Pau Gomar Sánchez","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The recruitment and retention of professionals in indirectly managed and privately managed health care institutions is governed by a different regulatory framework than in directly managed institutions. That legal framework is the Workers’ Statute, which contains its own regulatory elements in terms of bargaining power and general basic conditions, among others. The regulatory framework of the Workers’ Statute allows for a broad capacity for management, negotiation and agreement in the field of human resources management, and specifically in the processes of recruitment, selection and retention, but for some years now basic legislation and interventions by public control bodies have been incorporated which have modified this discretionarily for indirect management entities, bringing them closer and closer to the system of administrative management for civil servants/statutory employees, and consequently limiting the capacity for decision making and adaptation typical of business/private management. This article attempts to explain the similarities and differences between the different areas of management and to explore the weaknesses and opportunities of each of them in terms of recruitment, selection, and retention policies, offering a specific reflection on the selection of executives and managers, as well as an analysis and assessment of the retention of professionals in healthcare institutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 102392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911124000396/pdfft?md5=53bcb46fe8c7dac015a27a03ab70bb06&pid=1-s2.0-S0213911124000396-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911124000396","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The recruitment and retention of professionals in indirectly managed and privately managed health care institutions is governed by a different regulatory framework than in directly managed institutions. That legal framework is the Workers’ Statute, which contains its own regulatory elements in terms of bargaining power and general basic conditions, among others. The regulatory framework of the Workers’ Statute allows for a broad capacity for management, negotiation and agreement in the field of human resources management, and specifically in the processes of recruitment, selection and retention, but for some years now basic legislation and interventions by public control bodies have been incorporated which have modified this discretionarily for indirect management entities, bringing them closer and closer to the system of administrative management for civil servants/statutory employees, and consequently limiting the capacity for decision making and adaptation typical of business/private management. This article attempts to explain the similarities and differences between the different areas of management and to explore the weaknesses and opportunities of each of them in terms of recruitment, selection, and retention policies, offering a specific reflection on the selection of executives and managers, as well as an analysis and assessment of the retention of professionals in healthcare institutions.

[间接管理和私营管理实体卫生专业人员的招聘、遴选和留用]。
在间接管理和私人管理的医疗机构中,专业人员的招聘和留用受不同于直接管理机构的监管框架的制约。这一法律框架是《工人法规》,其中包含其自身在谈判能力和一般基本条件等方面的管理要素。工人规约》的监管框架允许在人力资源管理领域,特别是在招聘、甄选和留用过程中,有广泛的管理、谈判和协议能力,但若干年来,基本立法和公共监管机构的干预措施已纳入其中,对间接管理实体的这种自由裁量权进行了修改,使其越来越接近公务员/法定雇员的行政管理制度,从而限制了企业/私营管理所特有的决策和适应能力。本文试图解释不同管理领域之间的异同,探讨每个领域在招聘、选拔和留用政策方面的弱点和机遇,对行政人员和管理人员的选拔进行具体思考,并对医疗机构专业人员的留用进行分析和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gaceta Sanitaria
Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信