Impact of malaria rapid diagnostic tests on prescription patterns of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Oyo State, Nigeria.

MalariaWorld journal Pub Date : 2014-02-04 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.5281/zenodo.10878438
Olusimbo K Ige, Esther O Ayandipo
{"title":"Impact of malaria rapid diagnostic tests on prescription patterns of artemisinin-based combination therapy in Oyo State, Nigeria.","authors":"Olusimbo K Ige, Esther O Ayandipo","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.10878438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the era of valuable and costly artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for malaria it has been recommended that the use of ACTs is restricted to only those with confirmed positive malaria diagnosis. The potential benefits of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) on anti-malarial drug consumption have been demonstrated in a number of clinical trials. It is unknown if the introduction of RDTs in Nigeria has achieved the desired goal of reducing ACT consumption. This article assesses the impact of a state-wide roll-out of RDTs on ACT prescription in Oyo State, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ACT prescribing patterns for febrile patients were compared pre- and post-RDT introduction in 106 primary health care facilities. Routine data from the national malaria control programme monthly facility summary forms were extracted for three months before and after the RDT intervention and compared using a 'before and after' design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RDT testing rates for patients with fever revealed no trend; mean testing rate in the post RDT period was 64.5%. The mean malaria positivity rate was 71.3%, which equalled a proportional morbidity rate of 45.9% of all fever cases. ACT treatment to confirmed case ratio was consistently above the expected value of one and the ratio of treatment to tested patient exceeded one (mean ratio of 1.1) for the three months post RDT. The absolute number of ACT doses prescribed increased remarkably after the introduction of RDTs and ACTs revealing an extra utilisation of 14,199 doses, 5,534 (±517) versus 10,267 (±2,452), p<0.001. Relative Risk of ACT prescription in the post RDT period was 1.71 (1.33-2.25).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is notable non-adherence to RDT results, with an increase in ACT prescriptions after the initial introductory period for RDTs. This over reliance on ACTs for the management of non-malaria illness could compromise gains from reducing malaria morbidity and mortality and needs to be addressed urgently.</p>","PeriodicalId":74100,"journal":{"name":"MalariaWorld journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MalariaWorld journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10878438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the era of valuable and costly artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) for malaria it has been recommended that the use of ACTs is restricted to only those with confirmed positive malaria diagnosis. The potential benefits of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) on anti-malarial drug consumption have been demonstrated in a number of clinical trials. It is unknown if the introduction of RDTs in Nigeria has achieved the desired goal of reducing ACT consumption. This article assesses the impact of a state-wide roll-out of RDTs on ACT prescription in Oyo State, Nigeria.

Materials and methods: ACT prescribing patterns for febrile patients were compared pre- and post-RDT introduction in 106 primary health care facilities. Routine data from the national malaria control programme monthly facility summary forms were extracted for three months before and after the RDT intervention and compared using a 'before and after' design.

Results: RDT testing rates for patients with fever revealed no trend; mean testing rate in the post RDT period was 64.5%. The mean malaria positivity rate was 71.3%, which equalled a proportional morbidity rate of 45.9% of all fever cases. ACT treatment to confirmed case ratio was consistently above the expected value of one and the ratio of treatment to tested patient exceeded one (mean ratio of 1.1) for the three months post RDT. The absolute number of ACT doses prescribed increased remarkably after the introduction of RDTs and ACTs revealing an extra utilisation of 14,199 doses, 5,534 (±517) versus 10,267 (±2,452), p<0.001. Relative Risk of ACT prescription in the post RDT period was 1.71 (1.33-2.25).

Conclusion: There is notable non-adherence to RDT results, with an increase in ACT prescriptions after the initial introductory period for RDTs. This over reliance on ACTs for the management of non-malaria illness could compromise gains from reducing malaria morbidity and mortality and needs to be addressed urgently.

疟疾快速诊断检测对尼日利亚奥约州青蒿素类复方疗法处方模式的影响。
背景:在采用昂贵的青蒿素类复方疗法(ACT)治疗疟疾的时代,人们建议只在确诊疟疾呈阳性的患者中使用青蒿素类复方疗法。快速诊断检测(RDT)对抗疟药物消耗的潜在益处已在多项临床试验中得到证实。目前尚不清楚尼日利亚引入快速诊断检测是否实现了减少青蒿素综合疗法用药量的预期目标。本文评估了在尼日利亚奥约州全州范围内推广 RDT 对 ACT 处方的影响:对 106 家初级卫生保健机构引入 RDT 前后发热病人的青蒿素综合疗法处方模式进行了比较。从国家疟疾控制计划月度设施汇总表中提取了 RDT 干预前后三个月的常规数据,并采用 "前后 "设计进行比较:结果:发烧病人的 RDT 检测率没有趋势;RDT 检测后的平均检测率为 64.5%。疟疾阳性率平均为 71.3%,相当于所有发烧病例中 45.9% 的发病率。青蒿素综合疗法治疗与确诊病例的比率一直高于预期值 1,在检测后的三个月中,治疗与受检病人的比率超过了 1(平均比率为 1.1)。在引入 RDT 和 ACT 后,开出的 ACT 绝对剂量显著增加,多使用了 14,199 剂,分别为 5,534 剂(±517)和 10,267 剂(±2,452):明显存在不遵守检测结果的情况,而在引入检测结果的初期之后,青蒿素综合疗法的处方量有所增加。这种过度依赖青蒿素综合疗法治疗非疟疾疾病的情况可能会影响降低疟疾发病率和死亡率所取得的成果,亟需加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信