Correlation between unproven therapies and delayed return-to-work for COVID-19-infected healthcare workers.

Mouloud Bouhadfane, Elisabetta Monfardini, Anderson Loundou, Pierre Roy, Françoise Martin, Rafika Boufercha, Florence Bajon, Christine Beque, Antoine Villa, Marie-Pascale Lehucher-Michel
{"title":"Correlation between unproven therapies and delayed return-to-work for COVID-19-infected healthcare workers.","authors":"Mouloud Bouhadfane, Elisabetta Monfardini, Anderson Loundou, Pierre Roy, Françoise Martin, Rafika Boufercha, Florence Bajon, Christine Beque, Antoine Villa, Marie-Pascale Lehucher-Michel","doi":"10.1080/19338244.2024.2353264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study is to investigate factors influencing the time to return to work (RTW) of HealthCare Workers (HCW) infected with COVID-19 during the initial wave of the pandemic in a southern French university hospital. Data collection of 170 HCW (between March 16 to June 1, 2020) included demographic and professional information, clinical profiles, comorbidities, medical management, therapies and RT-PCR results. The mean time to RTW was 15.6 days. Multivariate analyses revealed that the time to RTW was shorter among laboratory and emergency workers, while it was longer for HCW aged 40 to 49 years, at higher risk of severe illness, with a delayed negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR or those treated with azithromycin and/or hydroxychloroquine. This study highlights diverse factors affecting HCW RTW post-COVID-19 infection, underscoring the importance of exercising caution in administering unproven therapies to HCW during the early stages of a novel infectious pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":93879,"journal":{"name":"Archives of environmental & occupational health","volume":" ","pages":"45-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of environmental & occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2024.2353264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate factors influencing the time to return to work (RTW) of HealthCare Workers (HCW) infected with COVID-19 during the initial wave of the pandemic in a southern French university hospital. Data collection of 170 HCW (between March 16 to June 1, 2020) included demographic and professional information, clinical profiles, comorbidities, medical management, therapies and RT-PCR results. The mean time to RTW was 15.6 days. Multivariate analyses revealed that the time to RTW was shorter among laboratory and emergency workers, while it was longer for HCW aged 40 to 49 years, at higher risk of severe illness, with a delayed negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR or those treated with azithromycin and/or hydroxychloroquine. This study highlights diverse factors affecting HCW RTW post-COVID-19 infection, underscoring the importance of exercising caution in administering unproven therapies to HCW during the early stages of a novel infectious pandemic.

感染 COVID-19 的医护人员未经证实的疗法与延迟重返工作岗位之间的相关性。
本研究旨在调查影响法国南部一所大学医院中感染 COVID-19 的医护人员(HCW)重返工作岗位(RTW)时间的因素。170 名医护人员(2020 年 3 月 16 日至 6 月 1 日期间)的数据收集包括人口统计学和专业信息、临床概况、合并症、医疗管理、疗法和 RT-PCR 结果。复工的平均时间为 15.6 天。多变量分析表明,实验室和急救人员的复工时间较短,而年龄在 40 至 49 岁之间、重症风险较高、SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阴性延迟或接受过阿奇霉素和/或羟氯喹治疗的医护人员的复工时间较长。本研究强调了影响感染 COVID-19 后高危工人 RTW 的各种因素,强调了在新型传染病大流行的早期阶段对高危工人谨慎使用未经证实的疗法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信