The Taxonomy of Subjective Cognitive Decline: Proposal and First Clinical Evidence from the Geneva Memory Clinic Cohort.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurodegenerative Diseases Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1159/000539053
Federica Ribaldi, Rafael Palomo, Daniele Altomare, Max Scheffler, Frederic Assal, Nicholas J Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Marc Abramowicz, Valentina Garibotto, Christian Chicherio, Giovanni B Frisoni
{"title":"The Taxonomy of Subjective Cognitive Decline: Proposal and First Clinical Evidence from the Geneva Memory Clinic Cohort.","authors":"Federica Ribaldi, Rafael Palomo, Daniele Altomare, Max Scheffler, Frederic Assal, Nicholas J Ashton, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Marc Abramowicz, Valentina Garibotto, Christian Chicherio, Giovanni B Frisoni","doi":"10.1159/000539053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is characterized by subjective cognitive concerns without objective cognitive impairment and is considered a risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia. However, most SCD patients will not develop neurodegenerative disorders, yet they may suffer from minor psychiatric, neurological, or somatic comorbidities. The aim of the present study was to provide a taxonomy of the heterogeneous SCD entity and to conduct a preliminary validation using data from a memory clinic sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were fifty-five SCD individuals consecutively recruited at the Geneva Memory Center. Based on clinical reports, they were classified into three clinically pre-defined subgroups: (i) those with psychological or psychiatric comorbidities (Psy), (ii) those with somatic comorbidities (SomCom), (iii) and those with no apparent cause (NAC). Baseline demographics, clinical, cognitive, and biomarker differences among the SCD subgroups were assessed. Longitudinal cognitive changes (average 3 years follow-up) were modeled using a linear mixed model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 55 SCD cases, 16 were SomCom, 18 Psy, and 21 NAC. 47% were female, mean age was 71 years. We observed higher frequency of APOE ε4 carriers in NAC (53%) compared to SomCom (14%) and Psy (0%, p = 0.023) and lower level of plasma Aβ42 in NAC (6.8 ± 1.0) compared to SomCom (8.4 ± 1.1; p = 0.031). SomCom subjects were older (74 years) than Psy (67 years, p = 0.011), and had greater medial temporal lobe atrophy (1.0 ± 1.0) than Psy (0.2 ± 0.6) and NAC (0.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.005). SomCom has worse episodic memory performances (14.5 ± 3.5) than Psy (15.8 ± 0.4) and NAC (15.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.032). We observed a slightly steeper, yet not statistically significant, cognitive decline in NAC (β = -0.48) compared to Psy (β = -0.28) and SomCom (β = -0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAC features a higher proportion of APOE ε4 carriers, lower plasma Aβ42 and a trend towards steeper cognitive decline than SomCom and Psy. Taken together, these findings suggest that NACs are at higher risk of cognitive decline due to AD. The proposed clinical taxonomy might be implemented in clinical practice to identify SCD at higher risk. However, such taxonomy should be tested on an independent cohort with a larger sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":19115,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) is characterized by subjective cognitive concerns without objective cognitive impairment and is considered a risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia. However, most SCD patients will not develop neurodegenerative disorders, yet they may suffer from minor psychiatric, neurological, or somatic comorbidities. The aim of the present study was to provide a taxonomy of the heterogeneous SCD entity and to conduct a preliminary validation using data from a memory clinic sample.

Methods: Participants were fifty-five SCD individuals consecutively recruited at the Geneva Memory Center. Based on clinical reports, they were classified into three clinically pre-defined subgroups: (i) those with psychological or psychiatric comorbidities (Psy), (ii) those with somatic comorbidities (SomCom), (iii) and those with no apparent cause (NAC). Baseline demographics, clinical, cognitive, and biomarker differences among the SCD subgroups were assessed. Longitudinal cognitive changes (average 3 years follow-up) were modeled using a linear mixed model.

Results: Out of the 55 SCD cases, 16 were SomCom, 18 Psy, and 21 NAC. 47% were female, mean age was 71 years. We observed higher frequency of APOE ε4 carriers in NAC (53%) compared to SomCom (14%) and Psy (0%, p = 0.023) and lower level of plasma Aβ42 in NAC (6.8 ± 1.0) compared to SomCom (8.4 ± 1.1; p = 0.031). SomCom subjects were older (74 years) than Psy (67 years, p = 0.011), and had greater medial temporal lobe atrophy (1.0 ± 1.0) than Psy (0.2 ± 0.6) and NAC (0.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.005). SomCom has worse episodic memory performances (14.5 ± 3.5) than Psy (15.8 ± 0.4) and NAC (15.8 ± 0.7, p = 0.032). We observed a slightly steeper, yet not statistically significant, cognitive decline in NAC (β = -0.48) compared to Psy (β = -0.28) and SomCom (β = -0.24).

Conclusions: NAC features a higher proportion of APOE ε4 carriers, lower plasma Aβ42 and a trend towards steeper cognitive decline than SomCom and Psy. Taken together, these findings suggest that NACs are at higher risk of cognitive decline due to AD. The proposed clinical taxonomy might be implemented in clinical practice to identify SCD at higher risk. However, such taxonomy should be tested on an independent cohort with a larger sample size.

主观认知能力下降的分类法:日内瓦记忆诊所队列的建议和首个临床证据。
导言:主观认知功能减退(SCD)的特点是主观认知问题而无客观认知障碍,被认为是认知功能减退和痴呆症的危险因素。然而,大多数 SCD 患者不会发展成神经退行性疾病,但他们可能患有轻微的精神、神经或躯体合并症。本研究的目的是通过分离出具有特定临床特征和认知轨迹的同质 SCD 亚群,对异质性 SCD 实体进行分类,并利用记忆门诊样本数据进行初步验证:参与者为日内瓦记忆中心连续招募的 55 名 SCD 患者。根据临床报告,他们被分为三个临床上预先定义的亚组:(i) 有心理或精神并发症(Psy)的患者;(ii) 有躯体并发症(SomCom)的患者;(iii) 无明显病因(NAC)的患者。对 SCD 亚组的基线人口统计学特征、临床、认知和生物标志物差异进行了评估。采用线性混合模型对认知的纵向变化(平均随访 3 年)进行建模:在 55 例 SCD 病例中,16 例为 SomCom,18 例为 Psy,21 例为 NAC。47%为女性,平均年龄为 71 岁。我们观察到,与SomCom(14%)和Psy(0%,P=0.023)相比,NAC(53%)中APOE ε4携带者的比例更高;与SomCom(8.4±1.1;P=0.031)相比,NAC中血浆Aβ42的水平更低(6.8±1.0)。SomCom受试者的年龄(74岁)大于Psy(67岁,P=0.011),颞叶内侧萎缩程度(1.0±1.0)大于Psy(0.2±0.6)和NAC(0.4±0.5,P=0.005)。与 Psy(15.8±0.4)和 NAC(15.8±0.7,P=0.032)相比,SomCom 的外显记忆表现更差(14.5±3.5)。我们观察到,与Psy(β=-0.28)和SomCom(β=-0.24)相比,NAC(β=-0.48)的认知能力下降速度稍快,但无统计学意义:结论:与 SomCom 和 Psy 相比,NAC 的 APOE ε4 携带者比例更高,血浆 Aβ42 更低,认知能力下降的趋势更明显。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,NAC患者因AD导致认知能力下降的风险更高。建议的临床分类法可在临床实践中实施,以识别高风险的 SCD。然而,这种分类法应在样本量更大的独立队列中进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Neurodegenerative Diseases 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Neurodegenerative Diseases'' is a bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal for the publication of advances in the understanding of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer''s disease, Parkinson''s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Huntington''s disease and related neurological and psychiatric disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信