BASDAI versus ASDAS in evaluating axial involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-04-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae058
Xenofon Baraliakos, Dafna D Gladman, Soumya D Chakravarty, Cinty Gong, May Shawi, Emmanouil Rampakakis, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, Enrique R Soriano, Philip J Mease
{"title":"BASDAI versus ASDAS in evaluating axial involvement in patients with psoriatic arthritis: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies.","authors":"Xenofon Baraliakos, Dafna D Gladman, Soumya D Chakravarty, Cinty Gong, May Shawi, Emmanouil Rampakakis, Mitsumasa Kishimoto, Enrique R Soriano, Philip J Mease","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In the absence of axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA)-specific tools, the BASDAI and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) are used to assess axial symptoms in patients with PsA. Here, we assessed the performance of BASDAI and ASDAS in patients with PsA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with active PsA in DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03162796 and NCT03158285, respectively) with or without axPsA but with available baseline BASDAI information were analysed; those with investigator-identified axial symptoms and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis comprised the axPsA cohort. Correlations between BASDAI/ASDAS and clinical variables were assessed with Pearson's coefficient (<i>r</i>). Longitudinal effects of enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index [LEI]), swollen joint count and presence versus absence of axPsA on BASDAI/ASDAS (normalized 0-10 scale) were analysed with mixed models for repeated measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline in the axPsA (<i>n</i> = 312) and non-axPsA (<i>n</i> = 124) cohorts, BASDAI scores showed no or weak correlation with swollen joint count (0.18-0.20), tender joint count (0.12-0.29), LEI (-0.04 to 0.24) and physician global assessment (0.35-0.43); moderate correlation with fatigue (both -0.56); and strong correlation with patient global assessment of disease activity (0.62-0.69) and patient-reported pain (0.66-0.70). Similar correlations were observed for ASDAS. Axial involvement versus non-involvement was associated with higher BASDAI scores and ASDAS (all β ≥ 0.5), without differences between instruments; longitudinal associations between swollen joint count (β ≤ 0.06)/LEI (β ≤ 0.19) and BASDAI/ASDAS were clinically unimportant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BASDAI and ASDAS performed similarly in patients with active PsA and axial involvement, independent of peripheral disease involvement, supporting their performance in assessing axial disease activity.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03162796 and NCT03158285.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 2","pages":"rkae058"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11099656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In the absence of axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA)-specific tools, the BASDAI and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) are used to assess axial symptoms in patients with PsA. Here, we assessed the performance of BASDAI and ASDAS in patients with PsA.

Methods: Patients with active PsA in DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03162796 and NCT03158285, respectively) with or without axPsA but with available baseline BASDAI information were analysed; those with investigator-identified axial symptoms and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis comprised the axPsA cohort. Correlations between BASDAI/ASDAS and clinical variables were assessed with Pearson's coefficient (r). Longitudinal effects of enthesitis (Leeds Enthesitis Index [LEI]), swollen joint count and presence versus absence of axPsA on BASDAI/ASDAS (normalized 0-10 scale) were analysed with mixed models for repeated measures.

Results: At baseline in the axPsA (n = 312) and non-axPsA (n = 124) cohorts, BASDAI scores showed no or weak correlation with swollen joint count (0.18-0.20), tender joint count (0.12-0.29), LEI (-0.04 to 0.24) and physician global assessment (0.35-0.43); moderate correlation with fatigue (both -0.56); and strong correlation with patient global assessment of disease activity (0.62-0.69) and patient-reported pain (0.66-0.70). Similar correlations were observed for ASDAS. Axial involvement versus non-involvement was associated with higher BASDAI scores and ASDAS (all β ≥ 0.5), without differences between instruments; longitudinal associations between swollen joint count (β ≤ 0.06)/LEI (β ≤ 0.19) and BASDAI/ASDAS were clinically unimportant.

Conclusion: BASDAI and ASDAS performed similarly in patients with active PsA and axial involvement, independent of peripheral disease involvement, supporting their performance in assessing axial disease activity.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03162796 and NCT03158285.

在评估银屑病关节炎患者的轴受累方面,BASDAI 与 ASDAS 的比较:两项 3 期研究的汇总分析。
目的:在缺乏轴向银屑病关节炎(axPsA)特异性工具的情况下,BASDAI和强直性脊柱炎疾病活动度评分(ASDAS)被用于评估PsA患者的轴向症状。在此,我们评估了 BASDAI 和 ASDAS 在 PsA 患者中的表现:我们分析了 DISCOVER-1 和 DISCOVER-2(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03162796 和 NCT03158285,分别为临床试验:NCT03162796 和 NCT03158285)中伴有或不伴有 axPsA 但有可用基线 BASDAI 信息的活动性 PsA 患者;研究者确定的轴向症状和影像学证实的骶髂关节炎患者组成 axPsA 队列。BASDAI/ASDAS 与临床变量之间的相关性用皮尔逊系数 (r) 进行评估。采用重复测量混合模型分析了关节内膜炎(利兹关节内膜炎指数[LEI])、关节肿胀计数以及是否存在 axPsA 对 BASDAI/ASDAS (归一化 0-10 级)的纵向影响:结果:在axPsA(n = 312)和非axPsA(n = 124)队列的基线上,BASDAI评分与关节肿胀计数(0.18-0.20)、关节触痛计数(0.12-0.29)、LEI(-0.04至0.24)和医生总体评估(0.04至0.24)无相关性或相关性较弱。24)和医生全局评估(0.35-0.43);与疲劳(均为-0.56)呈中度相关;与患者对疾病活动的全局评估(0.62-0.69)和患者报告的疼痛(0.66-0.70)呈强相关。在 ASDAS 中也观察到类似的相关性。轴受累与非受累均与较高的BASDAI评分和ASDAS评分相关(均β≥0.5),不同工具之间无差异;关节肿胀计数(β≤0.06)/LEI(β≤0.19)与BASDAI/ASDAS之间的纵向关联在临床上并不重要:结论:BASDAI和ASDAS在活动性PsA和轴向受累患者中的表现相似,不受周围疾病受累的影响,支持它们在评估轴向疾病活动性方面的表现:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03162796 和 NCT03158285。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信