Trust performance in managing inflammatory arthritis over time in England and Wales: a latent class analysis approach.

IF 2.1 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Pub Date : 2024-05-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rap/rkae053
Zijing Yang, Nikita Arumalla, Edward Alveyn, Sarah Gallagher, Elizabeth Price, Mark D Russell, Katie Bechman, Sam Norton, James Galloway
{"title":"Trust performance in managing inflammatory arthritis over time in England and Wales: a latent class analysis approach.","authors":"Zijing Yang, Nikita Arumalla, Edward Alveyn, Sarah Gallagher, Elizabeth Price, Mark D Russell, Katie Bechman, Sam Norton, James Galloway","doi":"10.1093/rap/rkae053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate trust-level performance in time to initiation of DMARD therapy in patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA), with identification of the change in performance trajectories over time and investigation of trust characteristics associated with this change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 130 trusts from the UK contributing to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) from 2018 to 2020. The primary outcome was days from referral to initiation of DMARD therapy in patients with EIA. Latent class growth mixture models were applied to identify distinct groups of trusts with similar trajectories of performance change over time. We used mixed effects linear and multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate the association between delay in treatment and trust-level characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time to DMARD initiation was 53 days (s.d. 18), with an average 0.3-day decrease with each month over time. Four latent trajectories were identified in our cohort, with >77% of individual trusts showing ongoing improvements in decreasing treatment waiting times. Prior to separating by latent class, time to DMARD initiation was shorter in trusts with higher rheumatology staffing, a local EIA treatment pathway and those with access to musculoskeletal ultrasound. Trusts with more nurses in the rheumatology department were less likely to be in the worst performance group [odds ratio 0.69 (95% CI 0.49, 0.93)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this cohort study, we observed a reduction in treatment waiting time over time. Trusts with better staffed and improved EIA clinical structure are likely to initiate definitive treatment earlier in patients with EIA.</p>","PeriodicalId":21350,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","volume":"8 2","pages":"rkae053"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11101285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology Advances in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkae053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate trust-level performance in time to initiation of DMARD therapy in patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA), with identification of the change in performance trajectories over time and investigation of trust characteristics associated with this change.

Methods: We included 130 trusts from the UK contributing to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) from 2018 to 2020. The primary outcome was days from referral to initiation of DMARD therapy in patients with EIA. Latent class growth mixture models were applied to identify distinct groups of trusts with similar trajectories of performance change over time. We used mixed effects linear and multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate the association between delay in treatment and trust-level characteristics.

Results: The mean time to DMARD initiation was 53 days (s.d. 18), with an average 0.3-day decrease with each month over time. Four latent trajectories were identified in our cohort, with >77% of individual trusts showing ongoing improvements in decreasing treatment waiting times. Prior to separating by latent class, time to DMARD initiation was shorter in trusts with higher rheumatology staffing, a local EIA treatment pathway and those with access to musculoskeletal ultrasound. Trusts with more nurses in the rheumatology department were less likely to be in the worst performance group [odds ratio 0.69 (95% CI 0.49, 0.93)].

Conclusion: In this cohort study, we observed a reduction in treatment waiting time over time. Trusts with better staffed and improved EIA clinical structure are likely to initiate definitive treatment earlier in patients with EIA.

英格兰和威尔士各信托机构在管理炎症性关节炎方面的表现:潜类分析法。
目的评估信托机构在早期炎症性关节炎(EIA)患者开始 DMARD 治疗时间方面的绩效,确定绩效轨迹随时间的变化,并调查与这种变化相关的信托机构特征:我们纳入了英国 130 家信托机构,这些机构在 2018 年至 2020 年期间参与了全国早期炎症性关节炎审计(NEIAA)。主要结果是EIA患者从转诊到开始DMARD治疗的天数。我们采用了潜类增长混合模型来识别具有相似绩效随时间变化轨迹的不同信托机构群体。我们使用混合效应线性和多项式逻辑回归模型来评估治疗延迟与托管机构特征之间的关联:开始使用DMARD的平均时间为53天(标准差为18天),随着时间的推移,每月平均减少0.3天。在我们的队列中发现了四种潜在轨迹,超过77%的托管机构在缩短治疗等待时间方面取得了持续改善。在按潜伏等级划分之前,风湿病学人员配备较高、拥有当地EIA治疗路径以及能够进行肌肉骨骼超声检查的信托机构,开始DMARD治疗的时间较短。风湿病科护士人数较多的信托机构不太可能属于表现最差组[几率比 0.69 (95% CI 0.49, 0.93)]:在这项队列研究中,我们发现随着时间的推移,治疗等待时间有所缩短。在这项队列研究中,我们观察到随着时间的推移,治疗等待时间有所缩短。人员配备更好、EIA 临床结构更完善的信托机构有可能更早地为 EIA 患者启动明确的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology Advances in Practice
Rheumatology Advances in Practice Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
197
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信