Natalie Layden, Genevieve Sesnan, Meredith Kessell, Mireille Hardie, Donna Taylor
{"title":"Stereotactic biopsy with contrast-enhanced mammography: the initial Australian experience","authors":"Natalie Layden, Genevieve Sesnan, Meredith Kessell, Mireille Hardie, Donna Taylor","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and MRI detect ‘contrast-only’ lesions (COLs) occult on standard breast imaging (ultrasound and conventional mammography). Until recently, MRI was the only reliable method of biopsy. This study presents the first Australian experience with CEM-guided biopsy (CEMBx) and the lessons learnt.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective audit of the first 15 consecutive patients who underwent CEMBx for COLs was performed. Indications for contrast imaging, patient and lesion characteristics, procedural details, radiation dose and pathology data were collected.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The 15 women were aged 37–81 years (mean 59 years). Indications for contrast imaging were problem solving (<i>n</i> = 3), moderate risk screening (<i>n</i> = 2), cancer staging (<i>n</i> = 9) and symptoms (<i>n</i> = 1). The COLs were non-mass (<i>n</i> = 14), mass (<i>n</i> = 1) and an enhancing asymmetry (<i>n</i> = 1). For one patient, two lesions were sampled during the same event. All lesions enhanced and were successfully sampled followed by marker clip insertion. Most biopsies (87.5%) were performed with the breast in cranio-caudal compression using a horizontal approach. Procedural duration ranged from 13 to 33 min (mean 22 min). Radiation dose was similar to standard stereotactic biopsy. Post-biopsy hematomas occurred in three patients, none required intervention. Clip displacement occurred in three cases. Core biopsy histopathology results were benign (<i>n</i> = 8), malignant (<i>n</i> = 7) and a borderline breast lesion (BBL) (<i>n</i> = 1). Patient satisfaction rates were high. Imaging follow-up is ongoing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CEMBx is a quick, safe and reliable alternative to MRIBx to sample COLs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 4","pages":"393-400"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13663","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) and MRI detect ‘contrast-only’ lesions (COLs) occult on standard breast imaging (ultrasound and conventional mammography). Until recently, MRI was the only reliable method of biopsy. This study presents the first Australian experience with CEM-guided biopsy (CEMBx) and the lessons learnt.
Methods
A prospective audit of the first 15 consecutive patients who underwent CEMBx for COLs was performed. Indications for contrast imaging, patient and lesion characteristics, procedural details, radiation dose and pathology data were collected.
Results
The 15 women were aged 37–81 years (mean 59 years). Indications for contrast imaging were problem solving (n = 3), moderate risk screening (n = 2), cancer staging (n = 9) and symptoms (n = 1). The COLs were non-mass (n = 14), mass (n = 1) and an enhancing asymmetry (n = 1). For one patient, two lesions were sampled during the same event. All lesions enhanced and were successfully sampled followed by marker clip insertion. Most biopsies (87.5%) were performed with the breast in cranio-caudal compression using a horizontal approach. Procedural duration ranged from 13 to 33 min (mean 22 min). Radiation dose was similar to standard stereotactic biopsy. Post-biopsy hematomas occurred in three patients, none required intervention. Clip displacement occurred in three cases. Core biopsy histopathology results were benign (n = 8), malignant (n = 7) and a borderline breast lesion (BBL) (n = 1). Patient satisfaction rates were high. Imaging follow-up is ongoing.
Conclusions
CEMBx is a quick, safe and reliable alternative to MRIBx to sample COLs.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.