Does targeted memory reactivation during slow-wave sleep and rapid eye movement sleep have differential effects on mnemonic discrimination and generalization?

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Sleep Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsae114
Rebeca Sifuentes Ortega, Philippe Peigneux
{"title":"Does targeted memory reactivation during slow-wave sleep and rapid eye movement sleep have differential effects on mnemonic discrimination and generalization?","authors":"Rebeca Sifuentes Ortega, Philippe Peigneux","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsae114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeted memory reactivation (TMR), or the presentation of learning-related cues during sleep, has been shown to benefit memory consolidation for specific memory traces when applied during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Prior studies suggest that TMR during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep may play a role in memory generalization processes, but evidence remains scarce. We tested the hypothesis that TMR exerts a differential effect on distinct mnemonic processes as a function of the sleep state (REM vs. NREM) in which TMR is delivered. Mnemonic discrimination and generalization of semantic categories were investigated using an adapted version of the Mnemonic Similarity Task, before and after sleep. Forty-eight participants encoded pictures from eight semantic categories, each associated with a sound. In the pre-sleep immediate test, they had to discriminate \"old\" (targets) from \"similar\" (lures) or \"new\" (foils) pictures. During sleep, half of the sounds were replayed in slow wave sleep (SWS) or REM sleep. Recognition, discrimination, and generalization memory indices were tested in the morning. These indices did not differ between SWS and REM TMR groups or reactivated and non-reactivated item categories. Additional results suggest a positive effect of TMR on performance for highly similar items mostly relying on mnemonic discrimination processes. During sleep, EEG activity after cue presentation increased in the delta-theta and sigma band in the SWS group, and in the beta band in the REM TMR group. These results do not support the hypothesis of differential processing of novel memory traces when TMR is administered in distinctive physiological sleep states.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae114","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Targeted memory reactivation (TMR), or the presentation of learning-related cues during sleep, has been shown to benefit memory consolidation for specific memory traces when applied during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. Prior studies suggest that TMR during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep may play a role in memory generalization processes, but evidence remains scarce. We tested the hypothesis that TMR exerts a differential effect on distinct mnemonic processes as a function of the sleep state (REM vs. NREM) in which TMR is delivered. Mnemonic discrimination and generalization of semantic categories were investigated using an adapted version of the Mnemonic Similarity Task, before and after sleep. Forty-eight participants encoded pictures from eight semantic categories, each associated with a sound. In the pre-sleep immediate test, they had to discriminate "old" (targets) from "similar" (lures) or "new" (foils) pictures. During sleep, half of the sounds were replayed in slow wave sleep (SWS) or REM sleep. Recognition, discrimination, and generalization memory indices were tested in the morning. These indices did not differ between SWS and REM TMR groups or reactivated and non-reactivated item categories. Additional results suggest a positive effect of TMR on performance for highly similar items mostly relying on mnemonic discrimination processes. During sleep, EEG activity after cue presentation increased in the delta-theta and sigma band in the SWS group, and in the beta band in the REM TMR group. These results do not support the hypothesis of differential processing of novel memory traces when TMR is administered in distinctive physiological sleep states.

SWS和REM睡眠期间的目标记忆再激活对记忆辨别和概括是否有不同影响?
研究表明,在非快速眼动睡眠(NREM)期间进行有针对性的记忆再激活(TMR),或在睡眠期间呈现与学习相关的线索,有利于特定记忆痕迹的记忆巩固。之前的研究表明,快速眼动睡眠期间的TMR可能在记忆泛化过程中发挥作用,但证据仍然很少。我们测试了这样一个假设:TMR 对不同的记忆过程产生不同的影响,这与 TMR 的睡眠状态(REM 与 NREM)有关。研究人员在睡眠前后使用改编版记忆相似性任务对记忆辨别和语义类别概括进行了调查。48 名参与者对 8 个语义类别的图片进行了编码,每个类别的图片都与一种声音相关联。在睡眠前的即时测试中,他们必须从 "相似"(诱饵)或 "新"(衬托)图片中分辨出 "旧"(目标)图片。在睡眠过程中,一半的声音会在慢波睡眠(SWS)或快速眼动睡眠中重放。早上测试识别、辨别和概括记忆指数。这些指数在慢波睡眠组和快速动眼期 TMR 组之间或重新激活和未重新激活的项目类别之间没有差异。其他结果表明,TMR 对高度相似项目的成绩有积极影响,这主要依赖于记忆性辨别过程。在睡眠过程中,提示呈现后的脑电图活动在 SWS 组中增加了 delta-theta 和 sigma 波段,而在 REM TMR 组中增加了 beta 波段。这些结果并不支持在不同的生理睡眠状态下进行 TMR 时对新记忆痕迹进行不同处理的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信