Fatemeh Homayounieh, Nikhil Gopal, Fatemeh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Pooyan Sahbaee, Pouria Yazdian, Moozhan Nikpanah, Michael Do, Muyang Wang, Rabindra Gautam, Mark W Ball, William F Pritchard, Elizabeth C Jones, Han Wen, W Marston Linehan, Evrim B Turkbey, Ashkan A Malayeri
{"title":"A Prospective Study of the Diagnostic Performance of Photon-Counting CT Compared With MRI in the Characterization of Renal Masses.","authors":"Fatemeh Homayounieh, Nikhil Gopal, Fatemeh Dehghani Firouzabadi, Pooyan Sahbaee, Pouria Yazdian, Moozhan Nikpanah, Michael Do, Muyang Wang, Rabindra Gautam, Mark W Ball, William F Pritchard, Elizabeth C Jones, Han Wen, W Marston Linehan, Evrim B Turkbey, Ashkan A Malayeri","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the interreader reliability and per-RCC sensitivity of high-resolution photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) in the detection and characterization of renal masses in comparison to MRI.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study included 24 adult patients (mean age, 52 ± 14 years; 14 females) who underwent PCCT (using an investigational whole-body CT scanner) and abdominal MRI within a 3-month time interval and underwent surgical resection (partial or radical nephrectomy) with histopathology (n = 70 lesions). Of the 24 patients, 17 had a germline mutation and the remainder were sporadic cases. Two radiologists (R1 and R2) assessed the PCCT and corresponding MRI studies with a 3-week washout period between reviews. Readers recorded the number of lesions in each patient and graded each targeted lesion's characteristic features, dimensions, and location. Data were analyzed using a 2-sample t test, Fisher exact test, and weighted kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In patients with von Hippel-Lindau mutation, R1 identified a similar number of lesions suspicious for neoplasm on both modalities (51 vs 50, P = 0.94), whereas R2 identified more suspicious lesions on PCCT scans as compared with MRI studies (80 vs 56, P = 0.12). R1 and R2 characterized more lesions as predominantly solid in MRIs (R1: 58/70 in MRI vs 52/70 in PCCT, P < 0.001; R2: 60/70 in MRI vs 55/70 in PCCT, P < 0.001). R1 and R2 performed similarly in detecting neoplastic lesions on PCCT and MRI studies (R1: 94% vs 90%, P = 0.5; R2: 73% vs 79%, P = 0.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The interreader reliability and per-RCC sensitivity of PCCT scans acquired on an investigational whole-body PCCT were comparable to MRI scans in detecting and characterizing renal masses.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>PCCT scans have comparable performance to MRI studies while allowing for improved characterization of the internal composition of lesions due to material decomposition analysis. Future generations of this imaging modality may reveal additional advantages of PCCT over MRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"774-781"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560711/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the interreader reliability and per-RCC sensitivity of high-resolution photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) in the detection and characterization of renal masses in comparison to MRI.
Materials and methods: This prospective study included 24 adult patients (mean age, 52 ± 14 years; 14 females) who underwent PCCT (using an investigational whole-body CT scanner) and abdominal MRI within a 3-month time interval and underwent surgical resection (partial or radical nephrectomy) with histopathology (n = 70 lesions). Of the 24 patients, 17 had a germline mutation and the remainder were sporadic cases. Two radiologists (R1 and R2) assessed the PCCT and corresponding MRI studies with a 3-week washout period between reviews. Readers recorded the number of lesions in each patient and graded each targeted lesion's characteristic features, dimensions, and location. Data were analyzed using a 2-sample t test, Fisher exact test, and weighted kappa.
Results: In patients with von Hippel-Lindau mutation, R1 identified a similar number of lesions suspicious for neoplasm on both modalities (51 vs 50, P = 0.94), whereas R2 identified more suspicious lesions on PCCT scans as compared with MRI studies (80 vs 56, P = 0.12). R1 and R2 characterized more lesions as predominantly solid in MRIs (R1: 58/70 in MRI vs 52/70 in PCCT, P < 0.001; R2: 60/70 in MRI vs 55/70 in PCCT, P < 0.001). R1 and R2 performed similarly in detecting neoplastic lesions on PCCT and MRI studies (R1: 94% vs 90%, P = 0.5; R2: 73% vs 79%, P = 0.13).
Conclusions: The interreader reliability and per-RCC sensitivity of PCCT scans acquired on an investigational whole-body PCCT were comparable to MRI scans in detecting and characterizing renal masses.
Clinical relevance statement: PCCT scans have comparable performance to MRI studies while allowing for improved characterization of the internal composition of lesions due to material decomposition analysis. Future generations of this imaging modality may reveal additional advantages of PCCT over MRI.
期刊介绍:
Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.