Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Kimberly K Lamberti, Efrat M Goffer, Elazer R Edelman, Steven P Keller
{"title":"Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling.","authors":"Kimberly K Lamberti, Efrat M Goffer, Elazer R Edelman, Steven P Keller","doi":"10.1007/s12265-024-10522-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous ventricular assist devices are increasingly relied on to maintain perfusion for cardiogenic shock patients. Optimal medical management strategies however remain uncertain from limited understanding of interventricular effects. This study analyzed the effects of pharmacologic and left-sided mechanical support on right ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A porcine model was developed to assess biventricular function during bolus pharmacologic administration before and after left-sided percutaneous ventricular assist and in cardiogenic shock.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The presence of mechanical support increased right ventricular load and stress with respect to the left ventricle. This shifted and exaggerated the relative effects of commonly used vasoactive agents. Furthermore, induction of cardiogenic shock led to differential pulmonary vascular and right ventricular responses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Left ventricular ischemia and mechanical support altered interventricular coupling. Resulting impacts of pharmacologic agents indicate differential right heart responses and sensitivity to treatments and the need for further study to optimize biventricular function in shock patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","volume":" ","pages":"1181-1192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518637/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-024-10522-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous ventricular assist devices are increasingly relied on to maintain perfusion for cardiogenic shock patients. Optimal medical management strategies however remain uncertain from limited understanding of interventricular effects. This study analyzed the effects of pharmacologic and left-sided mechanical support on right ventricular function.

Methods: A porcine model was developed to assess biventricular function during bolus pharmacologic administration before and after left-sided percutaneous ventricular assist and in cardiogenic shock.

Results: The presence of mechanical support increased right ventricular load and stress with respect to the left ventricle. This shifted and exaggerated the relative effects of commonly used vasoactive agents. Furthermore, induction of cardiogenic shock led to differential pulmonary vascular and right ventricular responses.

Conclusions: Left ventricular ischemia and mechanical support altered interventricular coupling. Resulting impacts of pharmacologic agents indicate differential right heart responses and sensitivity to treatments and the need for further study to optimize biventricular function in shock patients.

Abstract Image

药物和机械支持对左右心室耦合的不同影响
背景:心源性休克患者越来越依赖经皮心室辅助装置来维持血流灌注。然而,由于对心室间作用的了解有限,最佳医疗管理策略仍不确定。本研究分析了药物和左侧机械支持对右心室功能的影响:方法:建立了一个猪模型,以评估左侧经皮心室辅助和心源性休克患者在栓塞给药前后的双心室功能:结果:机械支持的存在增加了右心室相对于左心室的负荷和压力。这转移并夸大了常用血管活性药物的相对效应。此外,诱发心源性休克导致肺血管和右心室反应不同:结论:左心室缺血和机械支持改变了心室间耦合。结论:左心室缺血和机械支持改变了心室间耦合,药理作用的结果表明右心反应和对治疗的敏感性不同,需要进一步研究以优化休克患者的双心室功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research
Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research (JCTR) is a premier journal in cardiovascular translational research. JCTR is the journal of choice for authors seeking the broadest audience for emerging technologies, therapies and diagnostics, pre-clinical research, and first-in-man clinical trials. JCTR''s intent is to provide a forum for critical evaluation of the novel cardiovascular science, to showcase important and clinically relevant aspects of the new research, as well as to discuss the impediments that may need to be overcome during the translation to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信