Comparison of Different Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Eyes With Primary Angle Closure.

Abstract

Study design: Prospective case series.

Prcis: This prospective study determines which formulas can best predict the refractive outcome in patients with primary angle closure disease (PACD) after cataract surgery.

Objective: To compare the accuracy of 6 intraocular lens power calculation formulas, Barrett Universal II (BU II), Haigis, Hoffer Q, Holladay I, Kane and SRK/T, in eyes with PACD.

Patients and methods: Patients diagnosed with PACD and cataracts and who met the indication for cataract surgery were enrolled in the study. Six intraocular lens power calculation formulas were used to calculate the refractive diopter. The percentage of eyes with prediction error (PE) within ±0.50 D and the median absolute PE were compared to determine the accuracy of different formulas in patients with PACD. Subgroup analysis was performed according to axial length (AL). The accuracy of BU II was compared between patients with PACD and patients with age-related cataracts.

Results: One hundred five patients (105 eyes) with PACD and 35 patients (35 eyes) with age-related cataracts were enrolled in the study. Haigis, Kane, and BU II formula achieved a comparable outcome and outperformed over the other 3 formulas in patients with PACD. Subgroup analysis showed that the group with long AL has lower values of median absolute PE. PE was significantly positively correlated with AL and negatively correlated with relative lens position when calculated using BU II and Kane.

Conclusions: Haigis, Kane, and BU II formula achieved a comparable outcome and outperformed over the other 3 formulas in patients with PACD.