Enamel Caries Lesion Depth Obtained by Optical Coherence Tomography and Transverse Microradiography: A Comparative Study.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Caries Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-22 DOI:10.1159/000539406
Aline Silva Braga, Tobias Meißner, Ellen Schulz-Kornas, Rainer Haak, Ana Carolina Magalhães, Marcella Esteves-Oliveira
{"title":"Enamel Caries Lesion Depth Obtained by Optical Coherence Tomography and Transverse Microradiography: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Aline Silva Braga, Tobias Meißner, Ellen Schulz-Kornas, Rainer Haak, Ana Carolina Magalhães, Marcella Esteves-Oliveira","doi":"10.1159/000539406","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Visual imaging of subsurface caries lesions is of vital interest in dentistry, which can be obtained by invasive radiography technique as well as by available non-destructive imaging approaches. Thus, as a first step toward the development of a new innovative approach, Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was applied to detect the lesion depth in comparison to the established reference technique (transverse microradiography [TMR]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Bovine enamel specimens were demineralized for 5 days, following previous studies. For OCT, the resulting artificial lesions were scanned three-dimensionally (SD-OCT) and semi-automated measured (CarLQuant). For TMR, specimens were sectioned and the lesion depth was manually determined (Inspektor Research System).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The range of lesion depth detected with OCT was 24.0-174.0 μm (mouth rinse study), 18.0-178.0 μm (toothpastes study) and with TMR 59.2-198.0 μm (mouth rinse study), 33.2-133.4 μm (toothpastes study). We found a strong correlation between both methods in terms of lesion depth (Spearman rankwith outlierp &lt; 0.001, Rho = 0.75, Spearman rankwithout outlierp = 0.001, Rho = 0.79). The two methods produce similar results (Passing-Bablok regression, 1.16). As deeper is the lesion, the smallest is the difference between both methods as indicated by Bland-Altman-plots.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Especially in the case of deep lesions, the values obtained by both methods are in agreement, and OCT can potentially substitute TMR to detect and assess lesion depth with the benefit of being non-destructive.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"502-510"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539406","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Visual imaging of subsurface caries lesions is of vital interest in dentistry, which can be obtained by invasive radiography technique as well as by available non-destructive imaging approaches. Thus, as a first step toward the development of a new innovative approach, Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was applied to detect the lesion depth in comparison to the established reference technique (transverse microradiography [TMR]).

Methods: Bovine enamel specimens were demineralized for 5 days, following previous studies. For OCT, the resulting artificial lesions were scanned three-dimensionally (SD-OCT) and semi-automated measured (CarLQuant). For TMR, specimens were sectioned and the lesion depth was manually determined (Inspektor Research System).

Results: The range of lesion depth detected with OCT was 24.0-174.0 μm (mouth rinse study), 18.0-178.0 μm (toothpastes study) and with TMR 59.2-198.0 μm (mouth rinse study), 33.2-133.4 μm (toothpastes study). We found a strong correlation between both methods in terms of lesion depth (Spearman rankwith outlierp < 0.001, Rho = 0.75, Spearman rankwithout outlierp = 0.001, Rho = 0.79). The two methods produce similar results (Passing-Bablok regression, 1.16). As deeper is the lesion, the smallest is the difference between both methods as indicated by Bland-Altman-plots.

Conclusion: Especially in the case of deep lesions, the values obtained by both methods are in agreement, and OCT can potentially substitute TMR to detect and assess lesion depth with the benefit of being non-destructive.

通过光学相干断层扫描和横向微放射摄影获得的釉质龋损深度:一项比较研究。
导言:龋齿表面下病变的可视成像在牙科领域具有重要意义,可通过侵入性射线照相技术和现有的非破坏性成像方法获得。因此,作为开发新的创新方法的第一步,我们采用了光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)来检测病变深度,并与已有的参考技术(横向微射线照相术,TMR)进行了比较:方法:按照 Braga 等人之前的研究[2021]和[2022],将牛珐琅质标本脱矿 5 天。对于 OCT,对人工损伤进行三维扫描(SD-OCT)和半自动测量(CarLQuant)。对于 TMR,对标本进行切片,人工确定病变深度(Inspektor 研究系统):结果:用 OCT 检测到的病变深度范围为 24.0 至 174.0 µm(漱口水研究,Braga 等人,[2021]),18.0 至 178.0 µm(牙膏研究);用 TMR 检测到的病变深度范围为 59.2 至 198.0 µm(漱口水研究),33.2 至 133.4 µm(牙膏研究,Braga 等人,[2022])。我们发现这两种方法在病变深度方面有很强的相关性(Spearman rankwith outlier p<0.001,Rho=0.75;Spearman rankwithout outlier p=0.001,Rho=0.79)。两种方法得出的结果相似(Passing Bablok 回归,1.16)。布兰德-阿尔特曼图显示,病变越深,两种方法的差异越小:特别是在病变较深的情况下,两种方法得出的数值是一致的,OCT 有可能取代 TMR 来检测和评估病变深度,而且具有非破坏性的优点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信