Sex and age differences in the preference for materials for the communal nests of sociable weavers Philetairus socius

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ethology Pub Date : 2024-05-18 DOI:10.1111/eth.13472
Nicolas J. Silva, Fantine Benoit, Andrew Elliott, Charlotte Rault, Pierre Colençon, Rita Covas, Claire Doutrelant
{"title":"Sex and age differences in the preference for materials for the communal nests of sociable weavers Philetairus socius","authors":"Nicolas J. Silva,&nbsp;Fantine Benoit,&nbsp;Andrew Elliott,&nbsp;Charlotte Rault,&nbsp;Pierre Colençon,&nbsp;Rita Covas,&nbsp;Claire Doutrelant","doi":"10.1111/eth.13472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many animals build structures that are used for shelter, reproduction or to capture prey. The type of material used to build these structures is likely to influence their solidity, thermoregulation capacity and, in some species, may influence the attractiveness of the builders. In the case of animal nests, evidence for preference of nesting material has been documented in several species but, to date, few field experiments have been conducted, and it was seldom investigated whether individuals' attributes affected those preferences. We investigated these preferences in relation to individual attributes on sociable weavers (<i>Philetairus socius</i>) that build communally one of the largest known nest structures, using dry grass. We conducted an experiment where we presented two piles of straws, long and short, to wild individuals. We recorded 900 h of video and used a deep learning method to automatically detect images where birds were present (266 colour-ringed individuals). Our results showed that males picked more straws than females and showed a preference for longer straws, while no preference was found for females. In addition, older males showed a preference for long straws compared to younger males. Finally, males displayed higher repeatability than females in their preference for longer straws. In conclusion, we show that choice of nesting material is not random, and that preferences are associated with individual attributes. Future studies should assess how building is associated with social status, mating and reproductive success of the individuals building, to investigate which of these factors could have shaped the evolution of these preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13472","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many animals build structures that are used for shelter, reproduction or to capture prey. The type of material used to build these structures is likely to influence their solidity, thermoregulation capacity and, in some species, may influence the attractiveness of the builders. In the case of animal nests, evidence for preference of nesting material has been documented in several species but, to date, few field experiments have been conducted, and it was seldom investigated whether individuals' attributes affected those preferences. We investigated these preferences in relation to individual attributes on sociable weavers (Philetairus socius) that build communally one of the largest known nest structures, using dry grass. We conducted an experiment where we presented two piles of straws, long and short, to wild individuals. We recorded 900 h of video and used a deep learning method to automatically detect images where birds were present (266 colour-ringed individuals). Our results showed that males picked more straws than females and showed a preference for longer straws, while no preference was found for females. In addition, older males showed a preference for long straws compared to younger males. Finally, males displayed higher repeatability than females in their preference for longer straws. In conclusion, we show that choice of nesting material is not random, and that preferences are associated with individual attributes. Future studies should assess how building is associated with social status, mating and reproductive success of the individuals building, to investigate which of these factors could have shaped the evolution of these preferences.

Abstract Image

善于交际的织女 Philetairus socius 对公共巢穴材料偏好的性别和年龄差异
许多动物建造用于栖息、繁殖或捕获猎物的结构。用于建造这些结构的材料类型可能会影响其坚固性和温度调节能力,在某些物种中,还可能影响建造者的吸引力。就动物巢而言,有证据表明一些物种对筑巢材料有偏好,但迄今为止,很少进行过野外实验,也很少研究个体的属性是否会影响这些偏好。我们研究了交际织女(Philetairus socius)的这些偏好与个体属性的关系,交际织女使用干草共同建造了已知最大的巢穴结构之一。我们进行了一项实验,向野生个体展示了长短两堆稻草。我们录制了 900 小时的视频,并使用深度学习方法自动检测鸟类出现的图像(266 只彩环个体)。我们的结果显示,雄性比雌性采摘更多的吸管,并表现出对较长吸管的偏好,而雌性则没有这种偏好。此外,年龄较大的雄性比年龄较小的雄性更偏爱长吸管。最后,在偏好长吸管方面,雄性比雌性表现出更高的重复性。总之,我们的研究表明,筑巢材料的选择不是随机的,其偏好与个体属性有关。未来的研究应该评估筑巢与筑巢个体的社会地位、交配和繁殖成功率之间的关系,以研究这些因素中哪些可能影响了这些偏好的进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信