Endoscopic therapy of stoma closure site strictures in ileal pouches is safe and effective

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Osama Jabi, Nan Lan, Akshay Pokala, Ravi P Kiran, Bo Shen
{"title":"Endoscopic therapy of stoma closure site strictures in ileal pouches is safe and effective","authors":"Osama Jabi, Nan Lan, Akshay Pokala, Ravi P Kiran, Bo Shen","doi":"10.1093/gastro/goae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Strictures are a common complication after ileal pouch surgery with the most common locations being at the anastomosis, pouch inlet, and stoma closure site. No previous literature has described endoscopic therapy of stoma site stricture. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic therapy in the treatment of stoma closure site strictures. Method Patients diagnosed with stoma closure site strictures following ileal pouch surgery who underwent endoscopic treatment at the Center for Colorectal Diseases, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), and Ileal Pouch between 2018 and 2022 were analysed. Primary outcomes (technical success and surgery-free survival) were compared between endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) and stricturotomy and/or strictureplasty. Results A total of 30 consecutive eligible patients were analysed. Most patients were female (66.7%) and most patients were diagnosed with IBD (93.3%). Twenty patients (66.7%) had end-to-end anastomosis. A total of 52 procedures were performed, with EBD in 16 (30.8%) and stricturotomy and/or strictureplasty in 36 (69.2%). The mean stricture length was 1.7 ± 1.0 cm. Immediate technical success was achieved in 47 of 52 interventions (90.4%). During a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 9.9 months, none of the patients underwent surgical intervention for the stricture. Fourteen (46.7%) required endoscopic re-intervention for their strictures with an interval between index and re-interventional pouchoscopy of 8.8 ± 6.3 months. Post-procedural complications were reported in 2 (6.7%) with bleeding and none with perforation. Upon follow-up, 20 (66.7%) patients reported improvement in their symptoms. Conclusion EBD and endoscopic stricturotomy and/or strictureplasty are safe and effective in treating stoma closure site strictures in patients with ileal pouches, providing symptomatic relief in most patients as well as avoiding surgery.","PeriodicalId":54275,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Report","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Report","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goae038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Strictures are a common complication after ileal pouch surgery with the most common locations being at the anastomosis, pouch inlet, and stoma closure site. No previous literature has described endoscopic therapy of stoma site stricture. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of endoscopic therapy in the treatment of stoma closure site strictures. Method Patients diagnosed with stoma closure site strictures following ileal pouch surgery who underwent endoscopic treatment at the Center for Colorectal Diseases, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), and Ileal Pouch between 2018 and 2022 were analysed. Primary outcomes (technical success and surgery-free survival) were compared between endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) and stricturotomy and/or strictureplasty. Results A total of 30 consecutive eligible patients were analysed. Most patients were female (66.7%) and most patients were diagnosed with IBD (93.3%). Twenty patients (66.7%) had end-to-end anastomosis. A total of 52 procedures were performed, with EBD in 16 (30.8%) and stricturotomy and/or strictureplasty in 36 (69.2%). The mean stricture length was 1.7 ± 1.0 cm. Immediate technical success was achieved in 47 of 52 interventions (90.4%). During a mean follow-up of 12.7 ± 9.9 months, none of the patients underwent surgical intervention for the stricture. Fourteen (46.7%) required endoscopic re-intervention for their strictures with an interval between index and re-interventional pouchoscopy of 8.8 ± 6.3 months. Post-procedural complications were reported in 2 (6.7%) with bleeding and none with perforation. Upon follow-up, 20 (66.7%) patients reported improvement in their symptoms. Conclusion EBD and endoscopic stricturotomy and/or strictureplasty are safe and effective in treating stoma closure site strictures in patients with ileal pouches, providing symptomatic relief in most patients as well as avoiding surgery.
内窥镜治疗回肠袋造口关闭部位狭窄安全有效
背景造口狭窄是回肠造口手术后常见的并发症,最常见的部位是吻合口、造口袋入口和造口关闭部位。以前没有文献描述过造口处狭窄的内镜治疗。本研究旨在评估内镜疗法治疗造口闭合部位狭窄的安全性和有效性。方法 分析2018年至2022年期间在结直肠疾病、炎症性肠病(IBD)和回肠袋中心接受内镜治疗的回肠袋手术后确诊为造口闭合部位狭窄的患者。比较了内镜下球囊扩张术(EBD)与狭窄切除术和/或狭窄成形术的主要结果(技术成功率和无手术生存率)。结果 共分析了 30 名符合条件的连续患者。大多数患者为女性(66.7%),大多数患者被诊断为 IBD(93.3%)。20名患者(66.7%)进行了端对端吻合术。共进行了 52 次手术,其中 16 例(30.8%)进行了 EBD,36 例(69.2%)进行了狭窄切除术和/或狭窄成形术。平均狭窄长度为 1.7 ± 1.0 厘米。在 52 例介入治疗中,有 47 例(90.4%)取得了立竿见影的技术成功。在平均 12.7 ± 9.9 个月的随访期间,没有一名患者因狭窄而接受手术治疗。有 14 名患者(46.7%)需要通过内镜再次介入治疗狭窄,从首次介入治疗到再次介入治疗的间隔时间为 8.8 ± 6.3 个月。术后并发症有 2 例(6.7%)出血,无穿孔。随访结果显示,20 名(66.7%)患者的症状有所改善。结论 EBD 和内镜下狭窄切开术和/或狭窄成形术在治疗回肠造口患者的造口闭合部位狭窄方面安全有效,可缓解大多数患者的症状并避免手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Report
Gastroenterology Report Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
63
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology Report is an international fully open access (OA) online only journal, covering all areas related to gastrointestinal sciences, including studies of the alimentary tract, liver, biliary, pancreas, enteral nutrition and related fields. The journal aims to publish high quality research articles on both basic and clinical gastroenterology, authoritative reviews that bring together new advances in the field, as well as commentaries and highlight pieces that provide expert analysis of topical issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信