A new method for quantifying flake scar organisation on cores using orientation statistics

IF 2.6 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sam C. Lin , Chris Clarkson , I Made Agus Julianto , Anton Ferdianto , Jatmiko , Thomas Sutikna
{"title":"A new method for quantifying flake scar organisation on cores using orientation statistics","authors":"Sam C. Lin ,&nbsp;Chris Clarkson ,&nbsp;I Made Agus Julianto ,&nbsp;Anton Ferdianto ,&nbsp;Jatmiko ,&nbsp;Thomas Sutikna","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2024.105998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In stone artefact studies, researchers often rely on qualitative classifications to describe flake scar arrangements on cores. While this approach provides a broad overview of core reduction patterns, its application can be ambiguous due to the three-dimensional complexities of core geometry and the subjective nature of qualitative classifications, making it challenging to objectively compare flake scar patterning across different analytical settings. In this study, we present a new approach to quantify one aspect of flake scar arrangement on cores: the three-dimensional orientation of core scar negatives. Using standardised digital and experimentally flintknapped cores, we demonstrate that statistical techniques from fabric analysis can quantitatively characterise the scar orientation profile of cores. Importantly, this method is able to reveal variations in the flake scar arrangements of informal cores, such as multiplatform cores. When applied to a sample of multiplatform cores from the <em>Homo floresiensis</em> type-site of Liang Bua in Indonesia, we identify differences in flake scar orientation between cores made by <em>Homo floresiensis</em> and those manufactured by modern humans who utilised the site after the disappearance of the extinct hominin. This finding suggests a possible divergence in stone knapping practices between the two hominin taxa at Liang Bua. Overall, our research provides a new quantitative approach to gain new insights into hominin technological behaviour through stone artefact analysis. It also highlights the potential of 3D analysis for advancing the field of archaeological lithic research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"167 ","pages":"Article 105998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440324000669/pdfft?md5=8964296451b9ae56dc15e1be45ae22c3&pid=1-s2.0-S0305440324000669-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440324000669","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In stone artefact studies, researchers often rely on qualitative classifications to describe flake scar arrangements on cores. While this approach provides a broad overview of core reduction patterns, its application can be ambiguous due to the three-dimensional complexities of core geometry and the subjective nature of qualitative classifications, making it challenging to objectively compare flake scar patterning across different analytical settings. In this study, we present a new approach to quantify one aspect of flake scar arrangement on cores: the three-dimensional orientation of core scar negatives. Using standardised digital and experimentally flintknapped cores, we demonstrate that statistical techniques from fabric analysis can quantitatively characterise the scar orientation profile of cores. Importantly, this method is able to reveal variations in the flake scar arrangements of informal cores, such as multiplatform cores. When applied to a sample of multiplatform cores from the Homo floresiensis type-site of Liang Bua in Indonesia, we identify differences in flake scar orientation between cores made by Homo floresiensis and those manufactured by modern humans who utilised the site after the disappearance of the extinct hominin. This finding suggests a possible divergence in stone knapping practices between the two hominin taxa at Liang Bua. Overall, our research provides a new quantitative approach to gain new insights into hominin technological behaviour through stone artefact analysis. It also highlights the potential of 3D analysis for advancing the field of archaeological lithic research.

利用方位统计量化岩心片痕组织的新方法
在石制品研究中,研究人员通常依靠定性分类来描述石核上的片痕排列。虽然这种方法可以概括地描述石核的缩减模式,但由于石核几何形状的三维复杂性和定性分类的主观性,这种方法的应用可能会模糊不清,因此客观地比较不同分析环境下的鳞片疤痕模式具有挑战性。在本研究中,我们提出了一种量化岩芯上片痕排列的新方法:岩芯片痕底片的三维方向。通过使用标准化的数字和实验燧石岩心,我们证明了织物分析的统计技术可以定量描述岩心疤痕的方位轮廓。重要的是,这种方法能够揭示非正式岩心(如多平台岩心)的片痕排列变化。在对印度尼西亚梁布阿类型遗址的多平台岩心样本进行应用时,我们发现在已灭绝的类人猿消失后,由现代人和利用该遗址的现代人制造的岩心在片痕方向上存在差异。这一发现表明,在梁布阿的两个类人猿种群之间可能存在着不同的石器加工方法。总之,我们的研究提供了一种新的定量方法,通过石制品分析对人类的技术行为有了新的认识。它还凸显了三维分析在推进石器考古研究领域的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信