Clinical impact of delayed plastic biliary stent removal because of the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience from a tertiary ERCP referral center

iGIE Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2024.04.015
Dennis Lim MD, Steven Gruchy MD, MSc, Angela Tsai MD, Dana Farina MD, Geoff Williams MD, Jennifer Jones MD, MSc, Kevork Peltekian MD, Navjot Sandila MPH, Ali Kohansal MBBS, MEd
{"title":"Clinical impact of delayed plastic biliary stent removal because of the COVID-19 pandemic: the experience from a tertiary ERCP referral center","authors":"Dennis Lim MD,&nbsp;Steven Gruchy MD, MSc,&nbsp;Angela Tsai MD,&nbsp;Dana Farina MD,&nbsp;Geoff Williams MD,&nbsp;Jennifer Jones MD, MSc,&nbsp;Kevork Peltekian MD,&nbsp;Navjot Sandila MPH,&nbsp;Ali Kohansal MBBS, MEd","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.04.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Plastic biliary endoprosthesis is widely used because of its high efficacy and low cost. Delays in the removal or exchange of plastic biliary stents may lead to stent occlusion and subsequent sepsis,<sup>1,2</sup> with consensus recommendation of stent removal or exchange within 3 months.<sup>3-7</sup> We postulated that delayed plastic biliary stent removal observed during the pandemic would increase stent-related adverse events. We aim to report our single-center experience with adverse events arising from delayed plastic biliary stent removal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All individuals who had ERCP-guided plastic biliary stent placement in the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia, between December 2019 and March 2022 were included. Stent lifespan was defined as days between stent deployment and removal. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to represent the duration of stent patency. Only 10F-diameter stents were studied. Linear regression was used to analyze possible predictors of stent-related adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 286 cases were analyzed, of which 187 had delayed stent removal. Overall, 216 stents were removed without adverse events; 21 cases required urgent reintervention for adverse events; and in 26 cases, patients died of non-stent-related causes. Twenty-one stents had fully migrated out without causing adverse events. There was no difference in overall adverse events between the nondelayed versus delayed groups (23.2% vs 21.4%; odds ratio [OR], 0.899). Stent adverse events and emergent removal were marginally increased, at an OR of 1.21 and OR of 1.18, respectively, in indications related to stone disease.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>A significant increase was not observed in stent-related adverse events in individuals with stents removed after 90 days. Plastic biliary stent longevity may be longer than previously thought. Our findings suggest that the majority of inserted plastic biliary stents remain patent up to 6 months without adverse outcomes. Larger studies are required to better characterize other predictors of biliary stent obstruction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 264-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000487/pdfft?md5=0eaebf3534b18d4909d30c8c91c0afd5&pid=1-s2.0-S2949708624000487-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Plastic biliary endoprosthesis is widely used because of its high efficacy and low cost. Delays in the removal or exchange of plastic biliary stents may lead to stent occlusion and subsequent sepsis,1,2 with consensus recommendation of stent removal or exchange within 3 months.3-7 We postulated that delayed plastic biliary stent removal observed during the pandemic would increase stent-related adverse events. We aim to report our single-center experience with adverse events arising from delayed plastic biliary stent removal.

Methods

All individuals who had ERCP-guided plastic biliary stent placement in the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Center hospital in Halifax, Nova Scotia, between December 2019 and March 2022 were included. Stent lifespan was defined as days between stent deployment and removal. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to represent the duration of stent patency. Only 10F-diameter stents were studied. Linear regression was used to analyze possible predictors of stent-related adverse events.

Results

In total, 286 cases were analyzed, of which 187 had delayed stent removal. Overall, 216 stents were removed without adverse events; 21 cases required urgent reintervention for adverse events; and in 26 cases, patients died of non-stent-related causes. Twenty-one stents had fully migrated out without causing adverse events. There was no difference in overall adverse events between the nondelayed versus delayed groups (23.2% vs 21.4%; odds ratio [OR], 0.899). Stent adverse events and emergent removal were marginally increased, at an OR of 1.21 and OR of 1.18, respectively, in indications related to stone disease.

Conclusions

A significant increase was not observed in stent-related adverse events in individuals with stents removed after 90 days. Plastic biliary stent longevity may be longer than previously thought. Our findings suggest that the majority of inserted plastic biliary stents remain patent up to 6 months without adverse outcomes. Larger studies are required to better characterize other predictors of biliary stent obstruction.

Covid-19大流行导致塑料胆道支架拆除延迟的临床影响:一家三级ERCP转诊中心的经验
背景和目的塑料胆道内支架因其疗效高、成本低而被广泛使用。延迟取出或更换塑料胆道支架可能会导致支架闭塞和随后的败血症,1,2 一致建议在 3 个月内取出或更换支架。3-7 我们推测在大流行期间观察到的延迟取出塑料胆道支架的情况会增加与支架相关的不良事件。我们旨在报告因延迟取出塑料胆道支架而引发不良事件的单中心经验。方法纳入 2019 年 12 月至 2022 年 3 月期间在新斯科舍省哈利法克斯市伊丽莎白女王二世健康科学中心医院接受 ERCP 引导下塑料胆道支架置入手术的所有患者。支架寿命定义为支架放置与移除之间的天数。采用卡普兰-梅尔生存分析法来表示支架通畅的持续时间。仅研究了 10F 直径支架。线性回归用于分析支架相关不良事件的可能预测因素。结果共分析了 286 例病例,其中 187 例延迟取出支架。总体而言,216 个支架在未发生不良事件的情况下被移除;21 例患者因不良事件需要紧急再次介入治疗;26 例患者死于与支架无关的原因。有 21 个支架完全移出,但未引发不良事件。非延迟组与延迟组在总体不良事件上没有差异(23.2% vs 21.4%;几率比 [OR], 0.899)。与结石病有关的适应症中,支架不良事件和急诊移除率略有增加,分别为 OR 1.21 和 OR 1.18。塑料胆道支架的寿命可能比以前想象的要长。我们的研究结果表明,大多数插入的塑料胆道支架可保持通畅长达 6 个月,且不会出现不良后果。要更好地确定胆道支架阻塞的其他预测因素,还需要进行更大规模的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信