Using virtual reality to assess competence in abdominal point–of–care ultrasound

Maja Emilie Verland , Rune Overgaard Jensen , Anders Bo Nielsen , Stefan Posth , Lars Konge , Ole Graumann , Pia Iben Pietersen
{"title":"Using virtual reality to assess competence in abdominal point–of–care ultrasound","authors":"Maja Emilie Verland ,&nbsp;Rune Overgaard Jensen ,&nbsp;Anders Bo Nielsen ,&nbsp;Stefan Posth ,&nbsp;Lars Konge ,&nbsp;Ole Graumann ,&nbsp;Pia Iben Pietersen","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2024.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop a virtual reality test for abdominal point-of-care competence, to gather validity evidence for the test, and to establish a pass/fail score.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The developed test consisted of four abdominal point-of-care ultrasound cases. Medical students and doctors with varying abdominal point-of-care ultrasound experience were invited to the test and divided into three study groups: Novices, intermediates, and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators. Data from the following items were used for item analysis and to examine internal consistency: The ability to correctly enter patient identification, orientate the ultrasound probe, and select a patient diagnosis (hydronephrosis, cholecystitis, gallbladder stones, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and/or urine retention). The contrasting groups’ standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-one participants were included in the test. The item analysis included 49 items and a credible pass/fail score of 31 points was established (minimum of 0 points, maximum of 49 points). A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean test scores between the groups and showed significant difference between all three groups (p &lt; 0.001). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91), and an independent <em>t</em>-test showed statistically significant difference between the total scores of novices (mean = 23.7 points; SD = 8.7) and experienced operators (mean = 39.1 points; SD = 7.9), p &lt; 0.001.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We developed a test for abdominal point-of-care ultrasound competence assessment in virtual reality. Solid validity evidence was gathered, a credible pass/fail score was established, and the test could distinguish between novices and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000156/pdfft?md5=79ab798f5f339f20e9241e7236b80298&pid=1-s2.0-S2949668324000156-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to develop a virtual reality test for abdominal point-of-care competence, to gather validity evidence for the test, and to establish a pass/fail score.

Methods

The developed test consisted of four abdominal point-of-care ultrasound cases. Medical students and doctors with varying abdominal point-of-care ultrasound experience were invited to the test and divided into three study groups: Novices, intermediates, and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators. Data from the following items were used for item analysis and to examine internal consistency: The ability to correctly enter patient identification, orientate the ultrasound probe, and select a patient diagnosis (hydronephrosis, cholecystitis, gallbladder stones, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and/or urine retention). The contrasting groups’ standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score.

Results

Thirty-one participants were included in the test. The item analysis included 49 items and a credible pass/fail score of 31 points was established (minimum of 0 points, maximum of 49 points). A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean test scores between the groups and showed significant difference between all three groups (p < 0.001). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91), and an independent t-test showed statistically significant difference between the total scores of novices (mean = 23.7 points; SD = 8.7) and experienced operators (mean = 39.1 points; SD = 7.9), p < 0.001.

Conclusion

We developed a test for abdominal point-of-care ultrasound competence assessment in virtual reality. Solid validity evidence was gathered, a credible pass/fail score was established, and the test could distinguish between novices and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators.

利用虚拟现实技术评估腹部护理点超声检查能力
本研究旨在开发腹部护理点能力虚拟现实测试,收集该测试的有效性证据,并确定合格/不合格分数。测试由四个腹部超声点病例组成,邀请具有不同腹部超声点经验的医学生和医生参加,并分为三个研究小组:新手组、中级组和经验丰富的腹部定点超声操作员组。以下项目的数据用于项目分析和内部一致性检验:正确输入患者身份、确定超声探头方向和选择患者诊断(肾积水、胆囊炎、胆囊结石、腹主动脉瘤和/或尿潴留)的能力。对比组的标准设定方法用于确定合格/不合格分数。项目分析包括 49 个项目,可信的及格/不及格分数为 31 分(最低 0 分,最高 49 分)。采用单因素方差分析比较了各组的平均测试得分,结果显示三组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。内部一致性很高(Cronbach's alpha 为 0.91),独立 t 检验显示,新手(平均 = 23.7 分;SD = 8.7)和经验丰富的操作员(平均 = 39.1 分;SD = 7.9)的总分差异有统计学意义(p <0.001)。我们收集了可靠的有效性证据,确定了可信的及格/不及格分数,该测试可区分新手和经验丰富的腹部护理点超声操作员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信