Maja Emilie Verland , Rune Overgaard Jensen , Anders Bo Nielsen , Stefan Posth , Lars Konge , Ole Graumann , Pia Iben Pietersen
{"title":"Using virtual reality to assess competence in abdominal point–of–care ultrasound","authors":"Maja Emilie Verland , Rune Overgaard Jensen , Anders Bo Nielsen , Stefan Posth , Lars Konge , Ole Graumann , Pia Iben Pietersen","doi":"10.1016/j.wfumbo.2024.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to develop a virtual reality test for abdominal point-of-care competence, to gather validity evidence for the test, and to establish a pass/fail score.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The developed test consisted of four abdominal point-of-care ultrasound cases. Medical students and doctors with varying abdominal point-of-care ultrasound experience were invited to the test and divided into three study groups: Novices, intermediates, and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators. Data from the following items were used for item analysis and to examine internal consistency: The ability to correctly enter patient identification, orientate the ultrasound probe, and select a patient diagnosis (hydronephrosis, cholecystitis, gallbladder stones, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and/or urine retention). The contrasting groups’ standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-one participants were included in the test. The item analysis included 49 items and a credible pass/fail score of 31 points was established (minimum of 0 points, maximum of 49 points). A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean test scores between the groups and showed significant difference between all three groups (p < 0.001). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91), and an independent <em>t</em>-test showed statistically significant difference between the total scores of novices (mean = 23.7 points; SD = 8.7) and experienced operators (mean = 39.1 points; SD = 7.9), p < 0.001.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We developed a test for abdominal point-of-care ultrasound competence assessment in virtual reality. Solid validity evidence was gathered, a credible pass/fail score was established, and the test could distinguish between novices and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101281,"journal":{"name":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","volume":"2 2","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000156/pdfft?md5=79ab798f5f339f20e9241e7236b80298&pid=1-s2.0-S2949668324000156-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WFUMB Ultrasound Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949668324000156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to develop a virtual reality test for abdominal point-of-care competence, to gather validity evidence for the test, and to establish a pass/fail score.
Methods
The developed test consisted of four abdominal point-of-care ultrasound cases. Medical students and doctors with varying abdominal point-of-care ultrasound experience were invited to the test and divided into three study groups: Novices, intermediates, and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators. Data from the following items were used for item analysis and to examine internal consistency: The ability to correctly enter patient identification, orientate the ultrasound probe, and select a patient diagnosis (hydronephrosis, cholecystitis, gallbladder stones, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and/or urine retention). The contrasting groups’ standard setting method was used to establish a pass/fail score.
Results
Thirty-one participants were included in the test. The item analysis included 49 items and a credible pass/fail score of 31 points was established (minimum of 0 points, maximum of 49 points). A one-way ANOVA was used to compare the mean test scores between the groups and showed significant difference between all three groups (p < 0.001). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's alpha of 0.91), and an independent t-test showed statistically significant difference between the total scores of novices (mean = 23.7 points; SD = 8.7) and experienced operators (mean = 39.1 points; SD = 7.9), p < 0.001.
Conclusion
We developed a test for abdominal point-of-care ultrasound competence assessment in virtual reality. Solid validity evidence was gathered, a credible pass/fail score was established, and the test could distinguish between novices and experienced abdominal point-of-care ultrasound operators.