Anticonvulsants in the Treatment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Dementia: A Systematic Review

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
{"title":"Anticonvulsants in the Treatment of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Dementia: A Systematic Review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common and impart a significant burden to patients, caregivers, and the health system. However, there are few pharmacological options for treating BPSD. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials examining the efficacy of anticonvulsants in BPSD.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched five electronic databases through January 2023, for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants for the treatment of BPSD. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to ascertain the risk of bias in included trials. Because statistical pooling of results using meta-analysis was not feasible, we synthesized findings using the Cochrane Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 12 studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 systematic review. Five RCTs evaluating valproic acid were synthesized by a recent Cochrane review which concluded that this drug is likely ineffective for BPSD. We extracted data from 6 trials involving 248 individuals comparing non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants to either placebo or risperidone. Four trials (n = 97 participants) evaluated carbamazepine, only one of which demonstrated an improvement in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale measuring agitation, hostility, psychosis, and withdrawal/depression (effect size: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–1.73) relative to placebo. Adverse effects were more common in patients receiving carbamazepine (20/27; 74%) relative to placebo (5/24; 21%). There is low quality evidence that oxcarbazepine is likely ineffective and that topiramate may be comparable to risperidone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Anticonvulsants are unlikely to be effective in BPSD, although the quality of existing evidence is low.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748124003336/pdfft?md5=5d73276dca97a5b7bae656d747dbebd5&pid=1-s2.0-S1064748124003336-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1064748124003336","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are common and impart a significant burden to patients, caregivers, and the health system. However, there are few pharmacological options for treating BPSD. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials examining the efficacy of anticonvulsants in BPSD.

Methods

We searched five electronic databases through January 2023, for randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy of non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants for the treatment of BPSD. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool to ascertain the risk of bias in included trials. Because statistical pooling of results using meta-analysis was not feasible, we synthesized findings using the Cochrane Synthesis Without Meta-analysis reporting guidelines.

Results

We identified 12 studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 1 systematic review. Five RCTs evaluating valproic acid were synthesized by a recent Cochrane review which concluded that this drug is likely ineffective for BPSD. We extracted data from 6 trials involving 248 individuals comparing non-benzodiazepine anticonvulsants to either placebo or risperidone. Four trials (n = 97 participants) evaluated carbamazepine, only one of which demonstrated an improvement in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale measuring agitation, hostility, psychosis, and withdrawal/depression (effect size: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54–1.73) relative to placebo. Adverse effects were more common in patients receiving carbamazepine (20/27; 74%) relative to placebo (5/24; 21%). There is low quality evidence that oxcarbazepine is likely ineffective and that topiramate may be comparable to risperidone.

Conclusion

Anticonvulsants are unlikely to be effective in BPSD, although the quality of existing evidence is low.

治疗痴呆症患者行为和心理症状的抗惊厥药物:系统综述
目的痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD)很常见,给患者、护理人员和医疗系统带来了沉重负担。然而,治疗 BPSD 的药物选择却很少。我们对研究抗惊厥药在 BPSD 中疗效的临床试验进行了系统性综述。方法我们检索了五个电子数据库,检索时间截止到 2023 年 1 月,其中包括评估非苯二氮卓类抗惊厥药治疗 BPSD 疗效的随机对照试验和系统性综述。我们使用科克伦偏倚风险工具来确定纳入试验的偏倚风险。由于无法使用荟萃分析对结果进行统计汇总,因此我们使用 Cochrane 不进行荟萃分析的综合报告指南对研究结果进行了综合。结果我们确定了 12 项研究,包括随机对照试验 (RCT) 和 1 篇系统综述。最近的一篇 Cochrane 综述对评估丙戊酸的 5 项随机对照试验进行了综述,该综述认为丙戊酸可能对 BPSD 无效。我们从涉及 248 人的 6 项试验中提取了数据,这些试验将非苯二氮卓类抗惊厥药与安慰剂或利培酮进行了比较。四项试验(n = 97 名参与者)对卡马西平进行了评估,其中只有一项试验显示,与安慰剂相比,卡马西平在测量激越、敌意、精神病和戒断/抑郁的简明精神病评定量表中的表现有所改善(效应大小:1.13;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.54-1.73)。相对于安慰剂(5/24;21%),接受卡马西平治疗的患者出现不良反应的比例更高(20/27;74%)。有低质量证据表明,奥卡西平可能无效,而托吡酯可能与利培酮相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信