Luteal phase support with oral progesterone improves live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles using letrozole

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
{"title":"Luteal phase support with oral progesterone improves live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles using letrozole","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Does luteal phase support (LPS) with oral progesterone improve the live birth rate (LBR) in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with letrozole?</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This retrospective cohort study included 1199 IUI cycles with letrozole between January 2017 and December 2021. A nearest neighbour random matching approach was employed to pair the LPS group and the control group in a 1:2 ratio. Eight variables were chosen for matching in the propensity score matching (PSM) model: age; body mass index; duration of infertility; cause(s) of infertility; antral follicle count; basal concentration of FSH; rank of IUI attempts; and leading follicle size. LBR was selected as the primary outcome.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 427 LPS cycles were matched with 772 non-LPS (control) cycles after PSM. The LBR was significantly higher in the LPS group compared with the control group (19.7% versus 14.5%; P = 0.0255). The clinical pregnancy rate (23.2% versus 17.6%; P = 0.0245) and ongoing pregnancy rate (20.6% versus 15.8%; P = 0.0437) were also significantly higher in the LPS group. The biochemical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were similar in the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). The intergroup comparison revealed no significant variances in terms of gestational age, mode of delivery, ectopic pregnancy rate or abortion rate. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in birth weight or birth length between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Luteal support with oral progesterone significantly improved the LBR in IUI cycles with letrozole, but did not affect neonatal outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"49 4","pages":"Article 104077"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1472648324002669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question

Does luteal phase support (LPS) with oral progesterone improve the live birth rate (LBR) in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with letrozole?

Design

This retrospective cohort study included 1199 IUI cycles with letrozole between January 2017 and December 2021. A nearest neighbour random matching approach was employed to pair the LPS group and the control group in a 1:2 ratio. Eight variables were chosen for matching in the propensity score matching (PSM) model: age; body mass index; duration of infertility; cause(s) of infertility; antral follicle count; basal concentration of FSH; rank of IUI attempts; and leading follicle size. LBR was selected as the primary outcome.

Results

In total, 427 LPS cycles were matched with 772 non-LPS (control) cycles after PSM. The LBR was significantly higher in the LPS group compared with the control group (19.7% versus 14.5%; P = 0.0255). The clinical pregnancy rate (23.2% versus 17.6%; P = 0.0245) and ongoing pregnancy rate (20.6% versus 15.8%; P = 0.0437) were also significantly higher in the LPS group. The biochemical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The intergroup comparison revealed no significant variances in terms of gestational age, mode of delivery, ectopic pregnancy rate or abortion rate. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in birth weight or birth length between the two groups.

Conclusions

Luteal support with oral progesterone significantly improved the LBR in IUI cycles with letrozole, but did not affect neonatal outcomes.

口服黄体酮的黄体期支持可提高使用来曲唑联合或不联合 HMG 的人工授精周期患者的活产率
研究问题口服黄体酮的黄体期支持(LPS)是否能提高来曲唑宫腔内人工授精(IUI)周期患者的活产率(LBR)?采用近邻随机匹配法,将来曲唑组与对照组按 1:2 的比例配对。在倾向得分匹配(PSM)模型中选择了八个变量进行匹配:年龄;体重指数;不孕持续时间;不孕原因;前卵泡计数;FSH基础浓度;人工授精尝试次数;前卵泡大小。结果在 PSM 后,共有 427 个 LPS 周期与 772 个非 LPS(对照)周期进行了配对。LPS 组的 LBR 明显高于对照组(19.7% 对 14.5%;P = 0.0255)。LPS 组的临床妊娠率(23.2% 对 17.6%;P = 0.0245)和持续妊娠率(20.6% 对 15.8%;P = 0.0437)也明显高于对照组。两组的生化妊娠率、异位妊娠率和流产率相似(P > 0.05)。组间比较显示,孕龄、分娩方式、宫外孕率和流产率均无明显差异。结论口服黄体酮黄体支持可显著改善来曲唑人工授精周期的 LBR,但不会影响新生儿结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信