PhD students’ motivation profiles: A self-determination theory perspective

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
David Litalien , István Tóth-Király , Frédéric Guay , Alexandre J.S. Morin
{"title":"PhD students’ motivation profiles: A self-determination theory perspective","authors":"David Litalien ,&nbsp;István Tóth-Király ,&nbsp;Frédéric Guay ,&nbsp;Alexandre J.S. Morin","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has underscored the importance of understanding the mechanisms that underpin the academic motivation of PhD students. This understanding is crucial for enhancing their educational experience and program completion rates. Based on self-determination theory, this person-centered study first investigated PhD students’ motivation profiles defined on their types of academic motivations. Second, we explored associations between these profiles and various predictors (need satisfaction and support) and educational outcomes (persistence, satisfaction, future intentions, and performance). Third, we systematically tested the similarity of these profiles and their associations with predictors and outcomes across subgroups of students based on sex, field of study, citizenship, and program progression. Using a sample of 1060 Canadian PhD students, four distinct profiles emerged from the latent profile analyses: <em>Low self-determined</em>, <em>Introjected</em>, <em>Identified</em>, and <em>High self-determined</em>. Profile membership was predicted by need satisfaction and perceived support from faculty members. The most desirable outcome levels were associated with the <em>High self-determination</em> profile, followed by the <em>Identified</em>, <em>Introjected</em> and <em>Low self-determined</em> profiles. These profiles and their associations with predictors and outcomes were highly similar across the different subgroups. From a practical perspective, our results allowed us to identify students with less optimal motivation configurations and to propose intervention strategies, particularly focused on students’ need for autonomy, to support more desirable motivational profiles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000249/pdfft?md5=1d59f73d86131ec0f22e84ef57157351&pid=1-s2.0-S0361476X24000249-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000249","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has underscored the importance of understanding the mechanisms that underpin the academic motivation of PhD students. This understanding is crucial for enhancing their educational experience and program completion rates. Based on self-determination theory, this person-centered study first investigated PhD students’ motivation profiles defined on their types of academic motivations. Second, we explored associations between these profiles and various predictors (need satisfaction and support) and educational outcomes (persistence, satisfaction, future intentions, and performance). Third, we systematically tested the similarity of these profiles and their associations with predictors and outcomes across subgroups of students based on sex, field of study, citizenship, and program progression. Using a sample of 1060 Canadian PhD students, four distinct profiles emerged from the latent profile analyses: Low self-determined, Introjected, Identified, and High self-determined. Profile membership was predicted by need satisfaction and perceived support from faculty members. The most desirable outcome levels were associated with the High self-determination profile, followed by the Identified, Introjected and Low self-determined profiles. These profiles and their associations with predictors and outcomes were highly similar across the different subgroups. From a practical perspective, our results allowed us to identify students with less optimal motivation configurations and to propose intervention strategies, particularly focused on students’ need for autonomy, to support more desirable motivational profiles.

博士生的学习动机概况:自我决定理论视角
以往的研究强调了了解支撑博士生学术动机的机制的重要性。这种理解对于提高他们的教育体验和课程完成率至关重要。基于自我决定理论,这项以人为本的研究首先调查了博士生的学习动机类型。其次,我们探讨了这些特征与各种预测因素(需求满足和支持)和教育结果(坚持性、满意度、未来意向和表现)之间的关联。第三,我们根据性别、研究领域、公民身份和课程进度,系统地测试了这些特征的相似性,以及它们与不同学生子群体的预测因素和结果之间的关联。通过对 1060 名加拿大博士生进行抽样调查,潜在特征分析得出了四种不同的特征:低自我决定型、注入型、认同型和高自我决定型。需求满意度和感知到的教职员工的支持可以预测学生的特征。最理想的结果水平与 "高自我决定 "特征相关,其次是 "认同"、"引入 "和 "低自我决定 "特征。在不同的分组中,这些特征及其与预测因素和结果的关系非常相似。从实用的角度来看,我们的研究结果使我们能够识别出动机配置不太理想的学生,并提出干预策略,特别是关注学生的自主需求,以支持更理想的动机配置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信