Long-term impact of coronary artery transfer techniques during the arterial switch operation on neo-aortic root dilation

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Rafael Ayala , Maria Dudakova , Ulrike M.M. Bauer , Brigitte Stiller , Rouven Kubicki , Fabian A. Kari , National Register for Congenital Heart Defect Investigators
{"title":"Long-term impact of coronary artery transfer techniques during the arterial switch operation on neo-aortic root dilation","authors":"Rafael Ayala ,&nbsp;Maria Dudakova ,&nbsp;Ulrike M.M. Bauer ,&nbsp;Brigitte Stiller ,&nbsp;Rouven Kubicki ,&nbsp;Fabian A. Kari ,&nbsp;National Register for Congenital Heart Defect Investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ppedcard.2024.101731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Aortic dilation (AD) remains one of the most common complications needing re-operation after ASO (arterial switch operation) in simple transposition of the great arteries (TGA).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>We sought to clarify which coronary artery transfer techniques help to minimize postoperative neo-aortic root dilation after ASO for TGA.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>117 patients were identified in the German National Register for Congenital Heart Defects presenting transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum (TGA-IVS) with minimum 5-year follow-up who underwent ASO between 1986 and 2015 at 16 centers. Our study population was divided into two groups depending on the sinus tissue gain during coronary re-implantation. Group one (<em>n</em> = 72) included the tissue-gaining techniques slit, trap-door, J-/V-/U-incision, and pericardial augmentation. Group two (<em>n</em> = 45) included ‘punch’ as the no-tissue gaining technique. Transthoracic echocardiography data were analyzed retrospectively for development of neoaortic dilation defined by <em>Z</em>-score ≥ 2.0. As secondary endpoint was analyzed, the need for reintervention due to aortic pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Median follow-up was 11 (5–29) years; cumulative follow-up was 853 patient-years for group one and 19 (5–34) years; cumulative follow-up was 853 patient-years for group two, comprising 1706 patient-years, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001. We observed statistically significant higher <em>Z</em>-scores at the aortic valve annulus level in group one (<em>p</em> = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding re-operation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Neo-aortic roots of patients who underwent sinus gain tissue coronary artery transfer techniques show higher <em>Z</em>-scores than the punch technique in long-term postoperative follow-up. Lifelong surveillance of patients after ASO seems necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46028,"journal":{"name":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PROGRESS IN PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1058981324000298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Aortic dilation (AD) remains one of the most common complications needing re-operation after ASO (arterial switch operation) in simple transposition of the great arteries (TGA).

Objectives

We sought to clarify which coronary artery transfer techniques help to minimize postoperative neo-aortic root dilation after ASO for TGA.

Methods

117 patients were identified in the German National Register for Congenital Heart Defects presenting transposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum (TGA-IVS) with minimum 5-year follow-up who underwent ASO between 1986 and 2015 at 16 centers. Our study population was divided into two groups depending on the sinus tissue gain during coronary re-implantation. Group one (n = 72) included the tissue-gaining techniques slit, trap-door, J-/V-/U-incision, and pericardial augmentation. Group two (n = 45) included ‘punch’ as the no-tissue gaining technique. Transthoracic echocardiography data were analyzed retrospectively for development of neoaortic dilation defined by Z-score ≥ 2.0. As secondary endpoint was analyzed, the need for reintervention due to aortic pathology.

Results

Median follow-up was 11 (5–29) years; cumulative follow-up was 853 patient-years for group one and 19 (5–34) years; cumulative follow-up was 853 patient-years for group two, comprising 1706 patient-years, p < 0.0001. We observed statistically significant higher Z-scores at the aortic valve annulus level in group one (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding re-operation.

Conclusion

Neo-aortic roots of patients who underwent sinus gain tissue coronary artery transfer techniques show higher Z-scores than the punch technique in long-term postoperative follow-up. Lifelong surveillance of patients after ASO seems necessary.

动脉转换手术中冠状动脉转移技术对新主动脉根部扩张的长期影响
背景主动脉扩张(AD)仍是单纯大动脉转位(TGA)ASO(动脉转换手术)术后需要再次手术的最常见并发症之一。目的我们试图明确哪些冠状动脉转移技术有助于最大程度地减少 TGA ASO 术后新主动脉根部扩张。方法在德国国家先天性心脏缺陷登记册中确定了117名患者,这些患者均为大动脉转位伴室间隔完整(TGA-IVS),随访至少5年,于1986年至2015年期间在16个中心接受了ASO手术。我们的研究对象根据冠状动脉再植时窦道组织增量的不同分为两组。第一组(n = 72)包括缝合、活门、J-/V-/U-切口和心包增量等组织增量技术。第二组(n = 45)采用 "打孔 "作为无组织获取技术。对经胸超声心动图数据进行回顾性分析,以确定是否出现 Z 评分≥ 2.0 的新主动脉扩张。结果中位随访时间为 11(5-29)年;第一组累计随访时间为 853 患者年,第二组累计随访时间为 19(5-34)年;第二组累计随访时间为 853 患者年,包括 1706 患者年,P <0.0001。我们观察到,第一组患者主动脉瓣环水平的 Z 评分明显更高(p = 0.03)。结论接受窦增生组织冠状动脉转移技术的患者的新主动脉根部在术后长期随访中显示出比冲孔技术更高的 Z 评分。看来有必要对 ASO 术后的患者进行终身监护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
75 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Pediatric Cardiology is an international journal of review presenting information and experienced opinion of importance in the understanding and management of cardiovascular diseases in children. Each issue is prepared by one or more Guest Editors and reviews a single subject, allowing for comprehensive presentations of complex, multifaceted or rapidly changing topics of clinical and investigative interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信