Prospective comparison of cytomegalovirus quantification in whole blood and plasma samples among hematopoietic stem cell transplant and kidney transplant recipients

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY
Marion Helary , Nathalie Schnepf , Nadia Mahjoub , Mathilde Lacroix , Alienor Xhaard , Gillian Divard , Constance Delaugerre , Lucie Biard , Jérôme LeGoff , Linda Feghoul
{"title":"Prospective comparison of cytomegalovirus quantification in whole blood and plasma samples among hematopoietic stem cell transplant and kidney transplant recipients","authors":"Marion Helary ,&nbsp;Nathalie Schnepf ,&nbsp;Nadia Mahjoub ,&nbsp;Mathilde Lacroix ,&nbsp;Alienor Xhaard ,&nbsp;Gillian Divard ,&nbsp;Constance Delaugerre ,&nbsp;Lucie Biard ,&nbsp;Jérôme LeGoff ,&nbsp;Linda Feghoul","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2024.105690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Cytomegalovirus (CMV) induces multi-organ pathogenesis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Effective management involves systematic monitoring for CMV reactivation by quantitative real-time PCR, allowing timely preemptive intervention. However, the optimal blood compartment for CMV surveillance remains undetermined.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of the study was to compare the quantification of CMV DNA in paired plasma and whole blood samples.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>From June and October 2022, we conducted a prospective study with 390 sets of paired plasma and whole blood specimens collected from 60 HSCT and 24 KT recipients. CMV DNA levels were compared between the cobas® CMV assay on the automated cobas® 6800 system for plasma and the reference assay, Abbott RealTime CMV assay on the m2000 RealTime platform for whole blood.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The sensitivity and specificity of CMV quantification in plasma using the cobas® CMV assay were 90.0 % (95 %CI: 81.5 to 95.9) and 94.8 % (95 %CI: 91.8 to 96.8), respectively, compared to whole blood quantification with the Abbott assay. The overall agreement between these two strategies was 0.89 (95 %CI: 0.86–0.91). In samples with quantifiable results, a correlation was observed between the two methods (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.62, 95 %CI: 0.65–0.87, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). CMV loads were significantly higher in whole blood, with a mean bias of 0.42 log<sub>10</sub> IU/mL (95 %CI: -0.32–1.15).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The cobas® CMV assay in plasma showed significant concordance with the Abbott RealTime CMV assay in whole blood, confirming the relevance of plasma samples for CMV monitoring in HSCT and KT recipients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":"174 ","pages":"Article 105690"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653224000520","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) induces multi-organ pathogenesis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Effective management involves systematic monitoring for CMV reactivation by quantitative real-time PCR, allowing timely preemptive intervention. However, the optimal blood compartment for CMV surveillance remains undetermined.

Objective

The aim of the study was to compare the quantification of CMV DNA in paired plasma and whole blood samples.

Study design

From June and October 2022, we conducted a prospective study with 390 sets of paired plasma and whole blood specimens collected from 60 HSCT and 24 KT recipients. CMV DNA levels were compared between the cobas® CMV assay on the automated cobas® 6800 system for plasma and the reference assay, Abbott RealTime CMV assay on the m2000 RealTime platform for whole blood.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of CMV quantification in plasma using the cobas® CMV assay were 90.0 % (95 %CI: 81.5 to 95.9) and 94.8 % (95 %CI: 91.8 to 96.8), respectively, compared to whole blood quantification with the Abbott assay. The overall agreement between these two strategies was 0.89 (95 %CI: 0.86–0.91). In samples with quantifiable results, a correlation was observed between the two methods (R2 = 0.62, 95 %CI: 0.65–0.87, p < 0.0001). CMV loads were significantly higher in whole blood, with a mean bias of 0.42 log10 IU/mL (95 %CI: -0.32–1.15).

Conclusion

The cobas® CMV assay in plasma showed significant concordance with the Abbott RealTime CMV assay in whole blood, confirming the relevance of plasma samples for CMV monitoring in HSCT and KT recipients.

造血干细胞移植和肾移植受者全血和血浆样本中巨细胞病毒定量的前瞻性比较
背景巨细胞病毒(CMV)会诱发造血干细胞移植(HSCT)和肾移植(KT)受者的多器官发病。有效的治疗包括通过定量实时 PCR 系统监测 CMV 再激活,以便及时采取预防性干预措施。研究设计从 2022 年 6 月到 10 月,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,从 60 名造血干细胞移植受者和 24 名肾移植受者采集了 390 套配对血浆和全血标本。结果使用cobas® CMV测定对血浆进行CMV定量的灵敏度和特异性分别为90.0%(95%CI:81.5-95.9)和94.8%(95%CI:91.8-96.8),而使用雅培测定对全血进行定量的灵敏度和特异性分别为90.0%(95%CI:81.5-95.9)和94.8%(95%CI:91.8-96.8)。这两种方法的总体一致性为 0.89(95 %CI:0.86-0.91)。在结果可量化的样本中,两种方法之间存在相关性(R2 = 0.62,95 %CI:0.65-0.87,p < 0.0001)。结论血浆中的 cobas® CMV 检测法与全血中的雅培 RealTime CMV 检测法显示出明显的一致性,证实了血浆样本与造血干细胞移植和 KT 受者 CMV 监测的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信