Automated, High-Throughput Platform to Generate a High-Reliability, Comprehensive Rectal Cancer Database.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
N. Bhutiani, Mahmoud M G Yousef, A. Yousef, M. Zeineddine, M. Knafl, Olivia Ratliff, Uditha P Fernando, Anastasia Turin, F. Zeineddine, Jeff Jin, Kristin D Alfaro-Munoz, Drew Goldstein, George J Chang, S. Kopetz, John Paul Shen, A. Uppal
{"title":"Automated, High-Throughput Platform to Generate a High-Reliability, Comprehensive Rectal Cancer Database.","authors":"N. Bhutiani, Mahmoud M G Yousef, A. Yousef, M. Zeineddine, M. Knafl, Olivia Ratliff, Uditha P Fernando, Anastasia Turin, F. Zeineddine, Jeff Jin, Kristin D Alfaro-Munoz, Drew Goldstein, George J Chang, S. Kopetz, John Paul Shen, A. Uppal","doi":"10.1200/CCI.23.00219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nDynamic operations platforms allow for cross-platform data extraction, integration, and analysis, although application of these platforms to large-scale oncology enterprises has not been described. This study presents a pipeline for automated, high-fidelity extraction, integration, and validation of cross-platform oncology data in patients undergoing treatment for rectal cancer at a single, high-volume institution.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA dynamic operations platform was used to identify patients with rectal cancer treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2016 and 2022 who had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging and preoperative treatment details available in the electronic health record (EHR). Demographic, clinicopathologic, tumor mutation, radiographic, and treatment data were extracted from the EHR using a methodology adaptable to any disease site. Data accuracy was assessed by manual review. Accuracy before and after implementation of synoptic reporting was determined for MRI data.\n\n\nRESULTS\nA total of 516 patients with localized rectal cancer were included. In the era after institutional adoption of synoptic reports, the dynamic operations platform extracted T (tumor) category data from the EHR with 95% accuracy compared with 87% before the use of synoptic reports, and N (lymph node) category with 88% compared with 58%. Correct extraction of pelvic sidewall adenopathy was 94% compared with 78%, and extramural vascular invasion accuracy was 99% compared with 89%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation data were 99% accurate for patients who had synoptic data sources.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nUsing dynamic operations platforms enables automated cross-platform integration of multiparameter oncology data with high fidelity in patients undergoing multimodality treatment for rectal cancer. These pipelines can be adapted to other solid tumors and, together with standardized reporting, can increase efficiency in clinical research and the translation of actionable findings toward optimizing patient outcomes.","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI.23.00219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE Dynamic operations platforms allow for cross-platform data extraction, integration, and analysis, although application of these platforms to large-scale oncology enterprises has not been described. This study presents a pipeline for automated, high-fidelity extraction, integration, and validation of cross-platform oncology data in patients undergoing treatment for rectal cancer at a single, high-volume institution. METHODS A dynamic operations platform was used to identify patients with rectal cancer treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2016 and 2022 who had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging and preoperative treatment details available in the electronic health record (EHR). Demographic, clinicopathologic, tumor mutation, radiographic, and treatment data were extracted from the EHR using a methodology adaptable to any disease site. Data accuracy was assessed by manual review. Accuracy before and after implementation of synoptic reporting was determined for MRI data. RESULTS A total of 516 patients with localized rectal cancer were included. In the era after institutional adoption of synoptic reports, the dynamic operations platform extracted T (tumor) category data from the EHR with 95% accuracy compared with 87% before the use of synoptic reports, and N (lymph node) category with 88% compared with 58%. Correct extraction of pelvic sidewall adenopathy was 94% compared with 78%, and extramural vascular invasion accuracy was 99% compared with 89%. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation data were 99% accurate for patients who had synoptic data sources. CONCLUSION Using dynamic operations platforms enables automated cross-platform integration of multiparameter oncology data with high fidelity in patients undergoing multimodality treatment for rectal cancer. These pipelines can be adapted to other solid tumors and, together with standardized reporting, can increase efficiency in clinical research and the translation of actionable findings toward optimizing patient outcomes.
生成高可靠性综合直肠癌数据库的自动化高通量平台
目的动态操作平台可进行跨平台数据提取、整合和分析,但这些平台在大型肿瘤企业中的应用尚未见报道。方法使用动态操作平台识别 2016 年至 2022 年期间在 MD 安德森癌症中心接受治疗的直肠癌患者,这些患者的电子病历(EHR)中提供了磁共振成像(MRI)和术前治疗的详细信息。采用适用于任何疾病部位的方法从电子病历中提取人口统计学、临床病理学、肿瘤突变、放射学和治疗数据。数据准确性通过人工审核进行评估。结果共纳入了 516 例局部直肠癌患者。在机构采用同步报告后,动态操作平台从电子病历中提取 T(肿瘤)类别数据的准确率为 95%,而使用同步报告前为 87%;提取 N(淋巴结)类别数据的准确率为 88%,而使用同步报告前为 58%。盆腔侧壁腺病的正确提取率为 94%,而使用同步报告前为 78%;壁外血管侵犯的准确率为 99%,而使用同步报告前为 89%。结论使用动态操作平台可以对接受直肠癌多模式治疗的患者的多参数肿瘤数据进行高保真的跨平台自动整合。这些流水线可适用于其他实体瘤,加上标准化报告,可提高临床研究的效率,并将可操作的研究结果转化为优化患者预后的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信