Simple, Office-Based Intervention Improves Patient–Provider Relationship in New Patient Hand Visits

Q3 Medicine
{"title":"Simple, Office-Based Intervention Improves Patient–Provider Relationship in New Patient Hand Visits","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Effective patient–doctor communication is linked to improved patient functional and physiological health status, better adherence to physician recommendations, and increased patient satisfaction. However, studies show that patients have difficulty understanding and recalling information discussed during a medical encounter. The purpose of this study was to assess patient engagement, patient–doctor communication, and patient–doctor interactions with the utilization of a patient encounter card to help aid in communication.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>New patients presenting to a single hand surgeon during an 8-month period between 2019 and 2020 were recruited for this study. Patients were recruited in pre and postintervention phases, defined by the rollout of a patient encounter card. Patients studied in the preintervention group were defined as the control population and experienced a typical office visit. The postintervention group experienced a typical office visit with the addition of a patient encounter card distributed to patients prior to meeting with the physician and screened by the physician during the visit to guide the encounter. Patient satisfaction and engagement surveys were collected during patient checkout process.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Two hundred eighty-seven patients (70% participation rate) were enrolled in the preintervention (145) and postintervention (142) phases. The utilization of a patient encounter card for setting a visit agenda resulted in a significant increase in self-reported patient engagement, improving from 74% to 88%. In both phases, 98% of patients felt that the physician listened well or very well and reported high levels of confidence in the provider being able to address their primary health concerns (72% and 79%, respectively). Overall, patient satisfaction was maintained pre and postintervention (96% and 98%, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Use of the encounter card improved patients’ feelings of engagement during their visits. Further research is required to determine the impact of these tools on providers’ engagement and patient outcomes to improve quality of care in hand surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><p>Therapeutic II.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36920,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 529-533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124000732/pdfft?md5=9236641c1dbb804274e848c5b400dc69&pid=1-s2.0-S2589514124000732-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589514124000732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Effective patient–doctor communication is linked to improved patient functional and physiological health status, better adherence to physician recommendations, and increased patient satisfaction. However, studies show that patients have difficulty understanding and recalling information discussed during a medical encounter. The purpose of this study was to assess patient engagement, patient–doctor communication, and patient–doctor interactions with the utilization of a patient encounter card to help aid in communication.

Methods

New patients presenting to a single hand surgeon during an 8-month period between 2019 and 2020 were recruited for this study. Patients were recruited in pre and postintervention phases, defined by the rollout of a patient encounter card. Patients studied in the preintervention group were defined as the control population and experienced a typical office visit. The postintervention group experienced a typical office visit with the addition of a patient encounter card distributed to patients prior to meeting with the physician and screened by the physician during the visit to guide the encounter. Patient satisfaction and engagement surveys were collected during patient checkout process.

Results

Two hundred eighty-seven patients (70% participation rate) were enrolled in the preintervention (145) and postintervention (142) phases. The utilization of a patient encounter card for setting a visit agenda resulted in a significant increase in self-reported patient engagement, improving from 74% to 88%. In both phases, 98% of patients felt that the physician listened well or very well and reported high levels of confidence in the provider being able to address their primary health concerns (72% and 79%, respectively). Overall, patient satisfaction was maintained pre and postintervention (96% and 98%, respectively).

Conclusions

Use of the encounter card improved patients’ feelings of engagement during their visits. Further research is required to determine the impact of these tools on providers’ engagement and patient outcomes to improve quality of care in hand surgery.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic II.

简单的诊室干预改善了新患者手诊中患者与医疗服务提供者的关系
目的 有效的医患沟通与改善患者的功能和生理健康状况、更好地遵从医生建议以及提高患者满意度有关。然而,研究表明,患者很难理解和回忆起在就医过程中讨论过的信息。本研究的目的是评估患者参与度、医患沟通和医患互动情况,并使用患者就诊卡来帮助沟通。方法在2019年至2020年的8个月期间,本研究招募了在一位手外科医生处就诊的新患者。患者分干预前和干预后两个阶段招募,以推出患者见面卡为界定标准。干预前组的患者被定义为对照人群,经历了一次典型的诊室就诊。干预后组的患者经历了一次典型的诊室就诊,在与医生会面之前向患者分发了患者就诊卡,并由医生在就诊过程中进行筛查,以指导就诊。在患者结账过程中收集了患者满意度和参与度调查。结果干预前(145 名)和干预后(142 名)阶段共有 287 名患者(参与率为 70%)参与。使用患者就诊卡设定就诊议程后,患者自我报告的参与度显著提高,从 74% 提高到 88%。在这两个阶段,98% 的患者认为医生倾听得很好或非常好,并对医疗服务提供者能够解决其主要健康问题表示高度信任(分别为 72% 和 79%)。总体而言,患者的满意度在干预前和干预后都保持不变(分别为 96% 和 98%)。需要进一步研究确定这些工具对提供者的参与度和患者治疗效果的影响,以提高手外科的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信