Immediate Loading of 3-Unit Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses on 3 Vs 2 Implants, Comparison and Evaluation with up to 10-Year Follow-up.

Abstract

AIMS The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate and compare the implant survival rate, marginal bone levels and prostheses failure rate, of three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) supported by three vs. two implants immediately loaded in the posterior area. MATERIAL AND METHODS Partially edentulous patients in need of a three-unit implant supported FDP in the maxillary/mandibular posterior region were recruited and randomly split into two groups: Group 1 with three-unit FDP supported by three implants (Control); Group 2 with three-unit FDP supported by two implants (Test). Implants were inserted and immediately loaded with a temporary FDP. RESULTS Sixty-three patients were included in the study. A total of 178 implants were placed and immediately loaded (128 maxillary/50 mandibular) to support 74 immediate provisional fixed prostheses (52 maxillary and 22 mandibular) delivered on the same day of implant insertion/placement; 30 in Group 1 and 44 in Group 2. The comparison of three vs. two implants resulted in comparable implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, and prostheses failure rate. All implants healed uneventfully with no adverse clinical and radiographical signs or symptoms except for one implant failure in Group 1 resulting in a cumulative success rate of 99,5%, 98,9% for Group 1 and 100% for Group 2 with a follow-up of 6-to-10 (mean 7 years). Once loaded, the implants remained in function from a minimum of 6 years to 10 years. CONCLUSIONS Although more studies and larger sample sizes are needed to validate this study, the results showed no difference between the two Groups, demonstrating the potential viability of both clinical options.