Influence of arch action on load-carrying capacity of double-sized industrial precast slabs: A combined numerical and experimental study

Fayiz Amin , Alireza Bahrami , Hafiz Ahmed Waqas , M. Naveed , Ijaz Ali , Muhammad Usman Hanif , Ali Ejaz
{"title":"Influence of arch action on load-carrying capacity of double-sized industrial precast slabs: A combined numerical and experimental study","authors":"Fayiz Amin ,&nbsp;Alireza Bahrami ,&nbsp;Hafiz Ahmed Waqas ,&nbsp;M. Naveed ,&nbsp;Ijaz Ali ,&nbsp;Muhammad Usman Hanif ,&nbsp;Ali Ejaz","doi":"10.1016/j.rinma.2024.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The precast industry offers slab panels of different geometries according to the field conditions. These slab panels are popular in temporary constructions and beneficial in sustainability but have some financial limitations and local constraints. For a long time, the construction industry has used the arch action method, which restricts the stresses to the compression zone in concrete members and develops the required load-carrying capacity. For the same motives, industrial buildings have preferred semi-circular precast roofs, but the morphology was not suitable. For the proposed slab in this research, firstly, the typical industrial precast slab panel was doubled in width to minimize the time and efforts required for its casting, curing, and placement. Secondly, that doubled-in-width slab was provided with the arch action to confine the stresses to compression and benefit from the section entirely. Lastly, the top of the slab was kept flat to take advantage of the roof space. All these changes aimed for structural stability, reduced material's weight, improved load-carrying capacity, appropriate mobilization, and financial viability. A numerical approach and practical testing were adopted using the finite element modeling software, ABAQUS, to analyze load–deflection responses of both slabs through the concrete damage plasticity model. The proposed slab exhibited better performance as its capacity enhanced by about 1.5 times that of a typical slab. Although the volume of the material in the proposed slab increased slightly from 0.040 m<sup>3</sup> to 0.045 m<sup>3</sup>, the reductions in joint filler materials, reinforcements, and efforts required for mixing and lifting machinery compensated for this increase significantly. Hence, the slab can be recommended for the industry to save the costs while taking heavier loads efficiently.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101087,"journal":{"name":"Results in Materials","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 100575"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590048X24000499/pdfft?md5=72baf2a17b917195334b8195926222ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2590048X24000499-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Results in Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590048X24000499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The precast industry offers slab panels of different geometries according to the field conditions. These slab panels are popular in temporary constructions and beneficial in sustainability but have some financial limitations and local constraints. For a long time, the construction industry has used the arch action method, which restricts the stresses to the compression zone in concrete members and develops the required load-carrying capacity. For the same motives, industrial buildings have preferred semi-circular precast roofs, but the morphology was not suitable. For the proposed slab in this research, firstly, the typical industrial precast slab panel was doubled in width to minimize the time and efforts required for its casting, curing, and placement. Secondly, that doubled-in-width slab was provided with the arch action to confine the stresses to compression and benefit from the section entirely. Lastly, the top of the slab was kept flat to take advantage of the roof space. All these changes aimed for structural stability, reduced material's weight, improved load-carrying capacity, appropriate mobilization, and financial viability. A numerical approach and practical testing were adopted using the finite element modeling software, ABAQUS, to analyze load–deflection responses of both slabs through the concrete damage plasticity model. The proposed slab exhibited better performance as its capacity enhanced by about 1.5 times that of a typical slab. Although the volume of the material in the proposed slab increased slightly from 0.040 m3 to 0.045 m3, the reductions in joint filler materials, reinforcements, and efforts required for mixing and lifting machinery compensated for this increase significantly. Hence, the slab can be recommended for the industry to save the costs while taking heavier loads efficiently.

拱作用对双层工业预制板承载能力的影响:数值与实验相结合的研究
预制板行业可根据现场条件提供不同几何形状的板块。这些楼板在临时建筑中很受欢迎,有利于可持续发展,但也有一些财务限制和地方限制。长期以来,建筑行业一直采用拱形作用法,这种方法将应力限制在混凝土构件的压缩区,并能达到所需的承载能力。出于同样的动机,工业建筑也倾向于采用半圆形预制屋顶,但其形态并不合适。对于本研究中提出的楼板,首先,将典型的工业预制楼板面板宽度增加一倍,以最大限度地减少其浇注、养护和放置所需的时间和工作量。其次,加倍宽度的楼板具有拱形作用,可将应力限制在压缩范围内,并完全受益于截面。最后,楼板顶部保持平整,以利用屋顶空间。所有这些变化都是为了实现结构稳定、减轻材料重量、提高承载能力、适当调动和经济可行性。通过使用有限元建模软件 ABAQUS,采用数值方法和实际测试,通过混凝土破坏塑性模型分析了两种楼板的荷载-挠度响应。拟建楼板表现出更好的性能,其承载能力比普通楼板提高了约 1.5 倍。虽然拟议楼板的材料体积从 0.040 立方米略微增加到 0.045 立方米,但接缝填充材料、钢筋以及搅拌和提升机械所需工作量的减少大大补偿了这一增加。因此,可向工业界推荐这种楼板,以节省成本,同时有效地承受更重的荷载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信