Smoking and recurrent pregnancy loss: A cohort study of 2829 women

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Kathrine Vauvert R. Hviid , Sofie Bliddal , Meryam El Issaoui , Maria Christine Krog , Astrid Marie Kolte , Henriette Svarre Nielsen
{"title":"Smoking and recurrent pregnancy loss: A cohort study of 2829 women","authors":"Kathrine Vauvert R. Hviid ,&nbsp;Sofie Bliddal ,&nbsp;Meryam El Issaoui ,&nbsp;Maria Christine Krog ,&nbsp;Astrid Marie Kolte ,&nbsp;Henriette Svarre Nielsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jri.2024.104257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Smoking during pregnancy is associated with negative reproductive outcome. Less is known about the impact of smoking or previous smoking in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) which this study aimed to investigate. We included all women &lt;42 years (n=2829) referred to a RPL unit at Copenhagen University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2021 in the cohort with follow-up until June 2022. Patients were categorized as ‘smokers at time of referral’, ‘never-smokers’ or ‘former smokers’. The main outcomes were pregnancy history prior to referral, prospective pregnancy rate, live birth rate, rates of ectopic pregnancy, and stillbirth. At referral, smokers (n=373) were on average 2.0 years younger (<em>P</em>&lt;0.001) and had experienced significantly more pregnancy losses (<em>P</em>&lt;0.001), and stillbirths (<em>P</em>=0.01) compared to never-smokers (n=2100). Former smokers had a higher risk of stillbirth prior to referral compared to never-smokers but no differences in pregnancy rate or other outcomes. Prospective pregnancy rates were lower for smokers compared with never-smokers (71.8% vs. 77.5%, <em>P</em>=0.02). Live birth rate was 58.0% for the 243 women who smoked at referral compared to 61.4% for the 1488 never-smokers (<em>P</em>=0.32). Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancies were significantly more common for smokers (2.8% vs. 0.4%, <em>P</em>=0.01; 6.0% vs. 2.0%, <em>P</em>&lt;0.008). Women with RPL who smoked at referral were referred younger with a higher number of previous pregnancy losses and stillbirths compared with never-smokers. Fewer smokers achieved a pregnancy after referral but those who did had a similar live birth rate compared to never-smokers, although stillbirths and ectopic pregnancies were more common.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Reproductive Immunology","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Reproductive Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165037824000664","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smoking during pregnancy is associated with negative reproductive outcome. Less is known about the impact of smoking or previous smoking in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) which this study aimed to investigate. We included all women <42 years (n=2829) referred to a RPL unit at Copenhagen University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2021 in the cohort with follow-up until June 2022. Patients were categorized as ‘smokers at time of referral’, ‘never-smokers’ or ‘former smokers’. The main outcomes were pregnancy history prior to referral, prospective pregnancy rate, live birth rate, rates of ectopic pregnancy, and stillbirth. At referral, smokers (n=373) were on average 2.0 years younger (P<0.001) and had experienced significantly more pregnancy losses (P<0.001), and stillbirths (P=0.01) compared to never-smokers (n=2100). Former smokers had a higher risk of stillbirth prior to referral compared to never-smokers but no differences in pregnancy rate or other outcomes. Prospective pregnancy rates were lower for smokers compared with never-smokers (71.8% vs. 77.5%, P=0.02). Live birth rate was 58.0% for the 243 women who smoked at referral compared to 61.4% for the 1488 never-smokers (P=0.32). Stillbirth and ectopic pregnancies were significantly more common for smokers (2.8% vs. 0.4%, P=0.01; 6.0% vs. 2.0%, P<0.008). Women with RPL who smoked at referral were referred younger with a higher number of previous pregnancy losses and stillbirths compared with never-smokers. Fewer smokers achieved a pregnancy after referral but those who did had a similar live birth rate compared to never-smokers, although stillbirths and ectopic pregnancies were more common.

吸烟与复发性妊娠失败:对 2 829 名妇女进行的队列研究
怀孕期间吸烟与不良生殖结果有关。本研究旨在调查吸烟或曾经吸烟对复发性妊娠失败(RPL)妇女的影响,但对吸烟或曾经吸烟对复发性妊娠失败妇女的影响知之甚少。我们将2000年1月至2021年12月期间转诊至哥本哈根大学医院RPL科室的所有42岁女性(n=2829)纳入队列,随访至2022年6月。患者被分为 "转诊时吸烟者"、"从不吸烟者 "或 "曾经吸烟者"。主要结果包括转诊前的妊娠史、准妊娠率、活产率、宫外孕率和死胎率。与从不吸烟者(2100 人)相比,转诊时吸烟者(373 人)平均年轻 2.0 岁(P<0.001),经历过的妊娠失败(P<0.001)和死胎(P=0.01)明显更多。与从不吸烟者相比,曾经吸烟者在转诊前发生死胎的风险更高,但在妊娠率或其他结果方面没有差异。与从不吸烟者相比,吸烟者的预期怀孕率较低(71.8% 对 77.5%,P=0.02)。转诊时吸烟的 243 名妇女的活产率为 58.0%,而从不吸烟的 1488 名妇女的活产率为 61.4%(P=0.32)。吸烟者死胎和宫外孕的发生率明显更高(2.8% vs. 0.4%,P=0.01;6.0% vs. 2.0%,P<0.008)。与从不吸烟的妇女相比,转诊时吸烟的 RPL 妇女转诊时年龄更小,既往妊娠失败和死胎的次数也更多。转诊后成功怀孕的吸烟者较少,但与从不吸烟者相比,成功怀孕者的活产率相似,不过死胎和宫外孕更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
10.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Affiliated with the European Society of Reproductive Immunology and with the International Society for Immunology of Reproduction The aim of the Journal of Reproductive Immunology is to provide the critical forum for the dissemination of results from high quality research in all aspects of experimental, animal and clinical reproductive immunobiology. This encompasses normal and pathological processes of: * Male and Female Reproductive Tracts * Gametogenesis and Embryogenesis * Implantation and Placental Development * Gestation and Parturition * Mammary Gland and Lactation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信