Undergraduate student perceptions of instructor mindset and academic performance: A motivational climate theory perspective

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Matthew H. Kim , Jaeyun Han , Kristen N. Buford , Jennifer L. Osterhage , Ellen L. Usher
{"title":"Undergraduate student perceptions of instructor mindset and academic performance: A motivational climate theory perspective","authors":"Matthew H. Kim ,&nbsp;Jaeyun Han ,&nbsp;Kristen N. Buford ,&nbsp;Jennifer L. Osterhage ,&nbsp;Ellen L. Usher","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Academic achievement depends not only on learners’ skill but also the psychological factors that arise during learning, such as the belief that intelligence improves with effort—a growth mindset. In addition to being guided by their own beliefs, students might use information present in their learning environments to imagine what their instructors believe about students’ abilities, and alter their engagement accordingly. The present study applies motivational climate theory to examine the association between individual and shared student perceptions of instructors’ ability mindset on their academic performance. Data from 5,057 undergraduate students and 94 instructors in a public research university in the United States, across academic disciplines and instructional modalities, revealed that students’ individual and aggregated perceptions of their instructors’ mindset, but not their own mindset or instructors’ self-reported mindset, were associated with final grades. Additionally, a moderation analysis revealed that the association between aggregated perceptions of students’ perceptions of their instructors’ fixed mindset and course performance was significant in STEM courses but not in non-STEM courses, possibly reflecting meaningful differences in disciplinary norms and traditions that could shape ability mindset. Shifting instructors’ framing about ability, classroom practices, and students’ understanding and interpretation of these environmental signals, could improve achievement outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X24000250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic achievement depends not only on learners’ skill but also the psychological factors that arise during learning, such as the belief that intelligence improves with effort—a growth mindset. In addition to being guided by their own beliefs, students might use information present in their learning environments to imagine what their instructors believe about students’ abilities, and alter their engagement accordingly. The present study applies motivational climate theory to examine the association between individual and shared student perceptions of instructors’ ability mindset on their academic performance. Data from 5,057 undergraduate students and 94 instructors in a public research university in the United States, across academic disciplines and instructional modalities, revealed that students’ individual and aggregated perceptions of their instructors’ mindset, but not their own mindset or instructors’ self-reported mindset, were associated with final grades. Additionally, a moderation analysis revealed that the association between aggregated perceptions of students’ perceptions of their instructors’ fixed mindset and course performance was significant in STEM courses but not in non-STEM courses, possibly reflecting meaningful differences in disciplinary norms and traditions that could shape ability mindset. Shifting instructors’ framing about ability, classroom practices, and students’ understanding and interpretation of these environmental signals, could improve achievement outcomes.

本科生对教师心态和学习成绩的看法:动机氛围理论视角
学习成绩不仅取决于学习者的技能,还取决于学习过程中产生的心理因素,如认为智力会随着努力而提高的信念--成长心态。除了受自身信念的引导外,学生还可能利用学习环境中的信息来想象教师对学生能力的看法,并相应地改变自己的参与程度。本研究运用动机氛围理论,考察了学生对教师能力心态的个人看法和共同看法与学生学业成绩之间的关联。来自美国一所公立研究型大学的5057名本科生和94名导师的数据显示,学生对导师心态的个体和综合看法与最终成绩有关,但学生自己的心态或导师自我报告的心态与最终成绩无关。此外,调节分析表明,学生对其导师固定心态的总体看法与课程成绩之间的关系在科学、技术、工程和数学课程中显著,而在非科学、技术、工程和数学课程中则不显著,这可能反映了学科规范和传统中可能形成能力心态的有意义的差异。改变教师对能力的框架、课堂实践以及学生对这些环境信号的理解和解释,可以提高成绩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Contemporary Educational Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
3.90%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信