ASSESSMENT OF THE REASONS FOR PRESENTATION TO GLAUCOMA SERVICES DURING THE PANDEMIC AND THE KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE,PRACTICES (KAP) IN RELATION TO COVID-19

K. Srividya, A. Odayappan, R. Venkatesh, S. Kavitha
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF THE REASONS FOR PRESENTATION TO GLAUCOMA SERVICES DURING THE PANDEMIC AND THE KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE,PRACTICES (KAP) IN RELATION TO COVID-19","authors":"K. Srividya, A. Odayappan, R. Venkatesh, S. Kavitha","doi":"10.36106/ijar/5902200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To assess the reasons for visit amongst patients presenting to the glaucoma services and to assess their\nKnowledge, Attitude, Practices (KAP) in relation to COVID-19 and to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the glaucoma\ncare provision. Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Patients older than 18 years presenti Methods: ng to the glaucoma services at our\ntertiary eye centre either for the rst time or for follow-up between October and December 2020 - the immediate unlock period following the rst\nwave of COVID-19 pandemic were included. Data collected include the demographic details, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, examination\nndings, nal diagnosis and suggested treatment. The patients' KAP was then assessed using a validated questionnaire. The distribution of the\nvarious glaucoma diagnoses was compared between 2020 (pandemic year) vs. 2019 (pre-pandemic year) Ov Results: erall, 246 patients were\nincluded. The main reasons for seeking care were headache (66.3%) followed by ocular surface symptoms like itching or irritation (25.2%) and\npain (10.9%). 84.7% of follow-up patients reported that their visit to the hospital was delayed predominantly due to fear of getting infected\n(62.2%), paucity of public transport (48.4%) and lack of accompanying person (12.6%). There was signicantly greater proportion of new\nprimary angle closure patients (40.3%, p=0.036) whereas those with primary open angle glaucoma had come for follow-up care (26.1 %,\np=0.048). The mean KAP scores of the patients were 83.1%, 65.5% and 81.7% respectively. KAP in rel Conclusion: ation to COVID-19 was\ngood and there was a greater proportion of patients with acute presentations.","PeriodicalId":13502,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of applied research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of applied research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/5902200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the reasons for visit amongst patients presenting to the glaucoma services and to assess their Knowledge, Attitude, Practices (KAP) in relation to COVID-19 and to assess the impact of COVID-19 on the glaucoma care provision. Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Patients older than 18 years presenti Methods: ng to the glaucoma services at our tertiary eye centre either for the rst time or for follow-up between October and December 2020 - the immediate unlock period following the rst wave of COVID-19 pandemic were included. Data collected include the demographic details, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, examination ndings, nal diagnosis and suggested treatment. The patients' KAP was then assessed using a validated questionnaire. The distribution of the various glaucoma diagnoses was compared between 2020 (pandemic year) vs. 2019 (pre-pandemic year) Ov Results: erall, 246 patients were included. The main reasons for seeking care were headache (66.3%) followed by ocular surface symptoms like itching or irritation (25.2%) and pain (10.9%). 84.7% of follow-up patients reported that their visit to the hospital was delayed predominantly due to fear of getting infected (62.2%), paucity of public transport (48.4%) and lack of accompanying person (12.6%). There was signicantly greater proportion of new primary angle closure patients (40.3%, p=0.036) whereas those with primary open angle glaucoma had come for follow-up care (26.1 %, p=0.048). The mean KAP scores of the patients were 83.1%, 65.5% and 81.7% respectively. KAP in rel Conclusion: ation to COVID-19 was good and there was a greater proportion of patients with acute presentations.
评估大流行期间向青光眼服务机构求诊的原因以及与 COVID-19 有关的知识、态度和做法(KAP)。
目的:评估青光眼患者就诊的原因,评估他们对 COVID-19 的认识、态度和做法(KAP),并评估 COVID-19 对青光眼医疗服务的影响。设计:横断面观察研究。方法:纳入首次  或在 2020 年 10 月至 12 月期间(即 COVID-19 大流行后的第一波 )接受青光眼治疗的 18 岁以上患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学细节、视力、眼压、检查ndings、nal 诊断和建议治疗。然后使用有效问卷对患者的 KAP 进行评估。比较了 2020 年(大流行年)与 2019 年(大流行前年)各种青光眼诊断的分布情况。就诊的主要原因是头痛(66.3%),其次是眼表症状,如发痒或刺激(25.2%)和疼痛(10.9%)。84.7%的随访患者表示,他们推迟到医院就诊的主要原因是害怕受到感染(62.2%)、缺乏公共交通工具(48.4%)和缺少陪同人员(12.6%)。新发原发性闭角型青光眼患者的比例明显更高(40.3%,P=0.036),而原发性开角型青光眼患者则是来复诊的(26.1%,P=0.048)。患者的平均 KAP 评分分别为 83.1%、65.5% 和 81.7%。结论:COVID-19 的 KAP 评分良好,急性发作的患者比例较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信