Evaluación de la integridad macular, tras cirugía de desprendimiento de retina, mediante microperimetría MAIA

Q3 Medicine
A.J. Rallo-López , R. Martínez-Costa , A. Llovet-Rausell
{"title":"Evaluación de la integridad macular, tras cirugía de desprendimiento de retina, mediante microperimetría MAIA","authors":"A.J. Rallo-López ,&nbsp;R. Martínez-Costa ,&nbsp;A. Llovet-Rausell","doi":"10.1016/j.oftal.2024.04.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><p>To describe visual function, macular integrity, and fixation stability using (macular integrity assessment) microperimetry (MAIA) after retinal detachment surgery. Evaluate if there are statistically significant differences between surgical approaches.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A prospective, comparative, interventional study was conducted, recruiting a total of 21 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and macula-off. Eleven patients underwent surgery using pars plana vitrectomy, and 10 patients underwent scleral buckle surgery. Clinical examinations and optical coherence tomography were performed post-surgery. MAIA microperimetry was conducted at 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the number of letters read improved over time in the operated eye but did not reach the level of the control eye (<em>P<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->0.001). No significant differences were found between the 2 surgical approaches in BCVA (<em>P<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->0.230) or the number of letters read (<em>P<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->0.608). Macular integrity in the operated eye did not match that of the control eye in both procedures (<em>P<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->0.05). No differences were detected between the 2 surgeries, either in macular integrity (<em>P<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->0.512) or fixation stability (<em>P<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->0.835).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Following retinal detachment surgery, a decrease in BCVA and the number of letters read occurs, which does not reach the level of the control eye. No significant differences were observed between the<!--> <!-->2 surgical approaches. Macular integrity in the operated eye does not match that of the control eye.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8348,"journal":{"name":"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia","volume":"99 7","pages":"Pages 281-287"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos De La Sociedad Espanola De Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0365669124000686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective

To describe visual function, macular integrity, and fixation stability using (macular integrity assessment) microperimetry (MAIA) after retinal detachment surgery. Evaluate if there are statistically significant differences between surgical approaches.

Materials and methods

A prospective, comparative, interventional study was conducted, recruiting a total of 21 patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and macula-off. Eleven patients underwent surgery using pars plana vitrectomy, and 10 patients underwent scleral buckle surgery. Clinical examinations and optical coherence tomography were performed post-surgery. MAIA microperimetry was conducted at 6 months.

Results

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the number of letters read improved over time in the operated eye but did not reach the level of the control eye (P = 0.001). No significant differences were found between the 2 surgical approaches in BCVA (P = 0.230) or the number of letters read (P = 0.608). Macular integrity in the operated eye did not match that of the control eye in both procedures (P = 0.05). No differences were detected between the 2 surgeries, either in macular integrity (P = 0.512) or fixation stability (P = 0.835).

Conclusions

Following retinal detachment surgery, a decrease in BCVA and the number of letters read occurs, which does not reach the level of the control eye. No significant differences were observed between the 2 surgical approaches. Macular integrity in the operated eye does not match that of the control eye.

使用 MAIA 显微视力计评估视网膜脱离手术后黄斑的完整性。
背景和目的描述视网膜脱离手术后使用(黄斑完整性评估)显微视力计(MAIA)测量的视觉功能、黄斑完整性和固定稳定性。材料和方法进行了一项前瞻性、比较性、介入性研究,共招募了 21 名流变性视网膜脱离和黄斑脱落患者。11 名患者接受了玻璃体旁切除手术,10 名患者接受了巩膜扣带手术。手术后进行了临床检查和光学相干断层扫描。结果 手术眼的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和阅读字母数随着时间的推移有所提高,但未达到对照眼的水平(P = 0.001)。两种手术方法在 BCVA(P = 0.230)或读取字母数(P = 0.608)方面无明显差异。在两种手术方法中,手术眼的黄斑完整性与对照眼不一致(P = 0.05)。结论视网膜脱离手术后,BCVA 和阅读字母数都会下降,但不会达到对照眼的水平。两种手术方法之间无明显差异。手术眼的黄斑完整性与对照眼不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: La revista Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología, editada mensualmente por la propia Sociedad, tiene como objetivo publicar trabajos de investigación básica y clínica como artículos originales; casos clínicos, innovaciones técnicas y correlaciones clinicopatológicas en forma de comunicaciones cortas; editoriales; revisiones; cartas al editor; comentarios de libros; información de eventos; noticias personales y anuncios comerciales, así como trabajos de temas históricos y motivos inconográficos relacionados con la Oftalmología. El título abreviado es Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, y debe ser utilizado en bibliografías, notas a pie de página y referencias bibliográficas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信