Spuriously low immunosuppressant results due to incomplete hemolysis – A pitfall in transplant patient therapeutic drug monitoring

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Michael Vogeser, Katharina Habler
{"title":"Spuriously low immunosuppressant results due to incomplete hemolysis – A pitfall in transplant patient therapeutic drug monitoring","authors":"Michael Vogeser,&nbsp;Katharina Habler","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a crucial role in transplantation medicine when it comes to immunosuppressants like Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine A, Sirolimus, and Everolimus. The analysis involves using immunometric or mass spectrometric methods on whole blood samples. Hemolysis of the samples is necessary for the assessment. Typically, this is accomplished through manual protein precipitation using pre-treatment reagents, followed by vigorous vortex mixing and subsequent centrifugation. It is important to note that omitting the vortex step in these manual procedures can be seen as a potential procedural error.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>To assess the potential impact of omitting the vortex step, an experiment was conducted. Clinical samples were divided into two aliquots, which were then analyzed comparatively. In one group of aliquots, the vortex step was intentionally omitted, while the other followed the correct execution of the test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The non-vortex-mixed samples showed significantly erroneous low results for all analytes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Omitting or inadequately performing vortex mixing during the hemolysis procedure can be considered as a significant potential source of analytical error in TDM of immunosuppressants.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"33 ","pages":"Pages 4-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X2400021X/pdfft?md5=7c32ba18f8efa0cf90c8496e47976088&pid=1-s2.0-S2667145X2400021X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X2400021X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) plays a crucial role in transplantation medicine when it comes to immunosuppressants like Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine A, Sirolimus, and Everolimus. The analysis involves using immunometric or mass spectrometric methods on whole blood samples. Hemolysis of the samples is necessary for the assessment. Typically, this is accomplished through manual protein precipitation using pre-treatment reagents, followed by vigorous vortex mixing and subsequent centrifugation. It is important to note that omitting the vortex step in these manual procedures can be seen as a potential procedural error.

Methods

To assess the potential impact of omitting the vortex step, an experiment was conducted. Clinical samples were divided into two aliquots, which were then analyzed comparatively. In one group of aliquots, the vortex step was intentionally omitted, while the other followed the correct execution of the test.

Results

The non-vortex-mixed samples showed significantly erroneous low results for all analytes.

Conclusion

Omitting or inadequately performing vortex mixing during the hemolysis procedure can be considered as a significant potential source of analytical error in TDM of immunosuppressants.

不完全溶血导致免疫抑制剂结果偏低--移植患者治疗药物监测中的一个陷阱
目的当涉及他克莫司、环孢素 A、西罗莫司和依维莫司等免疫抑制剂时,治疗药物监测(TDM)在移植医学中起着至关重要的作用。该分析涉及对全血样本使用免疫测定或质谱方法。评估时需要对样本进行溶血。通常情况下,需要使用预处理试剂手动沉淀蛋白质,然后进行剧烈涡旋搅拌和离心。值得注意的是,在这些手动程序中省略涡旋步骤可能会被视为潜在的程序错误。方法为了评估省略涡旋步骤的潜在影响,我们进行了一项实验。临床样本被分成两份等分样品,然后进行比较分析。结论在溶血过程中省略或不适当地进行涡旋混合可被视为免疫抑制剂 TDM 分析错误的一个重要潜在来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信