Finite element simulation of iron losses for an Active Magnetic Bearing–Rotor system constructed of Hiperco laminations

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Vasileios-Menelaos Koufopanos, Pantelis G. Nikolakopoulos
{"title":"Finite element simulation of iron losses for an Active Magnetic Bearing–Rotor system constructed of Hiperco laminations","authors":"Vasileios-Menelaos Koufopanos,&nbsp;Pantelis G. Nikolakopoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.simpat.2024.102956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Iron losses appear in Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) mostly because of the rotor's movement, but also because of the fluctuation of the control current in the stator's coils. They can be divided into three categories: the hysteresis losses, the eddy current losses and the excess losses and while they depend significantly on the rotating speed and the magnetic flux density applied on the poles, the most contributing factor is the magnetic material used for the core. In this paper, a 2-D Finite Element Method transient model is used to simulate the rotational motion of the shaft inside the AMB and calculate the iron losses that occur due to the alternating magnetic flux inside the rotor, as well as the mechanical load capacity on the vertical direction of the AMB for each case. A simulation is carried out, at first, for a constant control current value and a speed range of 0–30,000 rpm, followed by a second one, for constant rotational speed and control current values 0–0.5 A. Geometry remains the same for all simulations. When it comes to the materials selected for the stator and the rotor, the cases of Hiperco 27, Hiperco 50 and Hiperco 50 HS laminations are tested. The iron losses of the three alloys are compared to the losses of 3 % silicon-iron. The results show that the three iron cobalt alloys have significantly lower losses than the silicon iron for the same AMB size and rotor's speeds. Hiperco 50 has the lowest loss among the three Hiperco alloys, while Hiperco 50 HS provides slightly higher mechanical load capacity under the same operating conditions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X24000704","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Iron losses appear in Active Magnetic Bearings (AMBs) mostly because of the rotor's movement, but also because of the fluctuation of the control current in the stator's coils. They can be divided into three categories: the hysteresis losses, the eddy current losses and the excess losses and while they depend significantly on the rotating speed and the magnetic flux density applied on the poles, the most contributing factor is the magnetic material used for the core. In this paper, a 2-D Finite Element Method transient model is used to simulate the rotational motion of the shaft inside the AMB and calculate the iron losses that occur due to the alternating magnetic flux inside the rotor, as well as the mechanical load capacity on the vertical direction of the AMB for each case. A simulation is carried out, at first, for a constant control current value and a speed range of 0–30,000 rpm, followed by a second one, for constant rotational speed and control current values 0–0.5 A. Geometry remains the same for all simulations. When it comes to the materials selected for the stator and the rotor, the cases of Hiperco 27, Hiperco 50 and Hiperco 50 HS laminations are tested. The iron losses of the three alloys are compared to the losses of 3 % silicon-iron. The results show that the three iron cobalt alloys have significantly lower losses than the silicon iron for the same AMB size and rotor's speeds. Hiperco 50 has the lowest loss among the three Hiperco alloys, while Hiperco 50 HS provides slightly higher mechanical load capacity under the same operating conditions.

有源磁悬浮轴承 - Hiperco 片式转子系统铁损的有限元模拟
有源磁悬浮轴承(AMB)中出现铁损的主要原因是转子的运动,但也因为定子线圈中控制电流的波动。它们可分为三类:磁滞损耗、涡流损耗和过剩损耗,虽然它们在很大程度上取决于转速和施加在磁极上的磁通密度,但最主要的影响因素是磁芯所用的磁性材料。本文采用二维有限元法瞬态模型模拟 AMB 内部轴的旋转运动,计算转子内部交变磁通造成的铁损,以及每种情况下 AMB 垂直方向上的机械负载能力。首先对恒定的控制电流值和 0-30,000 rpm 的转速范围进行模拟,然后对恒定的转速和 0-0.5 A 的控制电流值进行模拟。在定子和转子的材料选择方面,对 Hiperco 27、Hiperco 50 和 Hiperco 50 HS 薄片进行了测试。这三种合金的铁损耗与 3% 硅铁的损耗进行了比较。结果表明,在相同的 AMB 尺寸和转子速度下,三种铁钴合金的损耗明显低于硅铁。在三种 Hiperco 合金中,Hiperco 50 的损耗最低,而 Hiperco 50 HS 在相同工作条件下的机械负载能力略高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信