Treatment preferences in diverticulitis are common and rarely change after a clinic visit

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY
Anna A. Melio , Meredith Johnson , Jennifer A. Kaplan , Ravi Moonka , Vlad V. Simianu
{"title":"Treatment preferences in diverticulitis are common and rarely change after a clinic visit","authors":"Anna A. Melio ,&nbsp;Meredith Johnson ,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Kaplan ,&nbsp;Ravi Moonka ,&nbsp;Vlad V. Simianu","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With the increasing prevalence of diverticulitis, professional guidelines encourage the individualization of treatment. However, the frequency of treatment preferences of both surgeons, and patients, and the resultant impact of that preference on diverticulitis management is underexplored. We reviewed 27 consecutive patient visits of 3 colorectal surgeons at our institution to evaluate factors that drove their treatment, as well as their equipoise for patient randomization into medical or surgical treatments. Using standardized pre- and post-visit questionnaires, we investigated the impact of the clinic visit on treatment recommendations. Our results demonstrate that our surgeons have a practice bias towards complicated disease, and have a preference towards operative management of diverticulitis, in both complicated and uncomplicated disease. This preference was frequently unchanged after clinic visit, which has implications for guiding truly shared decision making, as it continues to be the recommendation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 212-216"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000629/pdfft?md5=52707aa007d59555870eb2c696b2c84e&pid=1-s2.0-S2589845024000629-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024000629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing prevalence of diverticulitis, professional guidelines encourage the individualization of treatment. However, the frequency of treatment preferences of both surgeons, and patients, and the resultant impact of that preference on diverticulitis management is underexplored. We reviewed 27 consecutive patient visits of 3 colorectal surgeons at our institution to evaluate factors that drove their treatment, as well as their equipoise for patient randomization into medical or surgical treatments. Using standardized pre- and post-visit questionnaires, we investigated the impact of the clinic visit on treatment recommendations. Our results demonstrate that our surgeons have a practice bias towards complicated disease, and have a preference towards operative management of diverticulitis, in both complicated and uncomplicated disease. This preference was frequently unchanged after clinic visit, which has implications for guiding truly shared decision making, as it continues to be the recommendation.

憩室炎的治疗偏好很常见,很少在就诊后发生改变
随着憩室炎的发病率越来越高,专业指南鼓励个性化治疗。然而,人们对外科医生和患者的治疗偏好频率以及这种偏好对憩室炎治疗的影响还缺乏深入研究。我们回顾了本院 3 位结直肠外科医生对 27 名患者的连续就诊情况,以评估促使他们采取治疗方法的因素,以及他们将患者随机分为药物治疗或手术治疗的等效性。我们使用就诊前和就诊后的标准化问卷,调查了门诊对治疗建议的影响。我们的结果表明,我们的外科医生在实践中偏向于复杂性疾病,并倾向于对复杂性和非复杂性疾病的憩室炎进行手术治疗。这种偏好在门诊后经常保持不变,这对指导真正的共同决策具有重要意义,因为这仍然是我们的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信