How English academic writing textbooks written by Chinese EFL teachers address the issue of plagiarism

IF 3.1 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yongyan Li , Meng Ge , Qianshan Chen
{"title":"How English academic writing textbooks written by Chinese EFL teachers address the issue of plagiarism","authors":"Yongyan Li ,&nbsp;Meng Ge ,&nbsp;Qianshan Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Studies have examined how EFL students and teachers understand plagiarism and the extent to which they can recognize subtle forms of plagiarism through their knowledge of the international conventions of source use. However, the precise ways in which plagiarism is conceptualized and anti-plagiarism strategies are presented to students in EFL contexts have received surprisingly little research attention. In the study reported in this paper, we investigated how the issue of plagiarism is addressed in English academic writing (EAW) textbooks authored by English language specialists and published in China. We collected a sample of 55 EAW textbooks that included a discussion of plagiarism and extracted the relevant teaching materials into a focal dataset. A qualitative content analysis of this dataset revealed four prominent features: defining plagiarism by international standards, reasoning on the causes of plagiarism among Chinese students, a triadic approach based on textual examples, and a pedagogical spotlight on paraphrasing. We conclude the paper by highlighting the important roles of English teachers and EAW textbooks in anti-plagiarism education in China and elsewhere. Further research is needed to explore how to effectively promote anti-plagiarism education in classrooms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101388"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1475158524000560","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have examined how EFL students and teachers understand plagiarism and the extent to which they can recognize subtle forms of plagiarism through their knowledge of the international conventions of source use. However, the precise ways in which plagiarism is conceptualized and anti-plagiarism strategies are presented to students in EFL contexts have received surprisingly little research attention. In the study reported in this paper, we investigated how the issue of plagiarism is addressed in English academic writing (EAW) textbooks authored by English language specialists and published in China. We collected a sample of 55 EAW textbooks that included a discussion of plagiarism and extracted the relevant teaching materials into a focal dataset. A qualitative content analysis of this dataset revealed four prominent features: defining plagiarism by international standards, reasoning on the causes of plagiarism among Chinese students, a triadic approach based on textual examples, and a pedagogical spotlight on paraphrasing. We conclude the paper by highlighting the important roles of English teachers and EAW textbooks in anti-plagiarism education in China and elsewhere. Further research is needed to explore how to effectively promote anti-plagiarism education in classrooms.

中国 EFL 教师编写的英语学术写作教科书如何解决抄袭问题
有研究探讨了 EFL 学生和教师如何理解抄袭,以及他们在多大程度上能够通过对国际资料来源使用惯例的了解来识别微妙形式的抄袭。然而,在 EFL 环境中,如何将抄袭概念化,如何向学生介绍反抄袭策略,这些问题却很少受到研究的关注。在本文所报告的研究中,我们调查了由英语语言专家编写的、在中国出版的英语学术写作(EAW)教科书是如何处理抄袭问题的。我们收集了 55 本包含抄袭讨论的英语学术写作教科书样本,并将相关教材提取到一个焦点数据集中。通过对该数据集的定性内容分析,我们发现了四个显著特点:以国际标准界定抄袭行为;对中国学生抄袭行为的成因进行推理;基于课文实例的三段论方法;以及对仿写的教学关注。最后,我们强调了英语教师和 EAW 教科书在中国和其他地区反抄袭教育中的重要作用。如何在课堂上有效推进反抄袭教育还需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
13.30%
发文量
81
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of English for Academic Purposes provides a forum for the dissemination of information and views which enables practitioners of and researchers in EAP to keep current with developments in their field and to contribute to its continued updating. JEAP publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges in the linguistic, sociolinguistic and psycholinguistic description of English as it occurs in the contexts of academic study and scholarly exchange itself.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信