Attitudes, communicative functions, and lexicogrammatical features of anti-vaccine discourse on Telegram

Souad Boumechaal , Serge Sharoff
{"title":"Attitudes, communicative functions, and lexicogrammatical features of anti-vaccine discourse on Telegram","authors":"Souad Boumechaal ,&nbsp;Serge Sharoff","doi":"10.1016/j.acorp.2024.100095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper reports the process of collecting a corpus with examples of anti-vaccine discourse and the results of its linguistic analysis. The overall aim of the project is to help public health authorities to improve their communication campaigns by better understanding the conditions for misinformation spreading via social media. More specifically, this paper analyses linguistic properties of a corpus of prominent misinformation channels in Telegram as compared against a more general COVID corpus as well as against a general purpose English corpus. For this paper, the quantitative analysis relies on corpus querying to identify the most recurrent discourse patterns related to COVID vaccines. We use the appraisal framework to analyse the patterns with respect to the attitudes conveyed in the messages. We have also applied an automatic AI classifier to predict communicative functions of these texts. This allows us to examine them more closely through the use of simple lexicogrammatical features following Biber, as well as their ideational processes following Halliday. The findings show that common collocations in the Telegram corpus containing misinformation draw on three attitudes: fear, insecurity, and mistrust in COVID vaccines which are discursively constructed to promote vaccine hesitancy among social media users. Furthermore, the misinformation messages tend to occur more often in such communicative functions as promotional texts, news reporting, and text expressed as presenting reference information.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72254,"journal":{"name":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Corpus Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666799124000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the process of collecting a corpus with examples of anti-vaccine discourse and the results of its linguistic analysis. The overall aim of the project is to help public health authorities to improve their communication campaigns by better understanding the conditions for misinformation spreading via social media. More specifically, this paper analyses linguistic properties of a corpus of prominent misinformation channels in Telegram as compared against a more general COVID corpus as well as against a general purpose English corpus. For this paper, the quantitative analysis relies on corpus querying to identify the most recurrent discourse patterns related to COVID vaccines. We use the appraisal framework to analyse the patterns with respect to the attitudes conveyed in the messages. We have also applied an automatic AI classifier to predict communicative functions of these texts. This allows us to examine them more closely through the use of simple lexicogrammatical features following Biber, as well as their ideational processes following Halliday. The findings show that common collocations in the Telegram corpus containing misinformation draw on three attitudes: fear, insecurity, and mistrust in COVID vaccines which are discursively constructed to promote vaccine hesitancy among social media users. Furthermore, the misinformation messages tend to occur more often in such communicative functions as promotional texts, news reporting, and text expressed as presenting reference information.

Telegram 上反疫苗言论的态度、交际功能和词汇语法特征
本文报告了反疫苗言论实例语料库的收集过程及其语言分析结果。该项目的总体目标是通过更好地了解错误信息通过社交媒体传播的条件,帮助公共卫生机构改进其传播活动。更具体地说,本文分析了 Telegram 中主要错误信息渠道语料库的语言特性,并与更通用的 COVID 语料库和通用英语语料库进行了比较。本文的定量分析依靠语料库查询来识别与 COVID 疫苗相关的最常见话语模式。我们使用评估框架来分析信息中所传达的态度模式。我们还应用了自动人工智能分类器来预测这些文本的交际功能。这样,我们就可以根据比伯(Biber)的简单词法特征以及哈利迪(Halliday)的表意过程,更仔细地研究这些文本。研究结果表明,包含错误信息的 Telegram 语料库中的常见搭配涉及三种态度:恐惧、不安全感和对 COVID 疫苗的不信任。此外,错误信息往往更频繁地出现在宣传文本、新闻报道和以提供参考信息为目的的文本等交际功能中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Corpus Linguistics
Applied Corpus Linguistics Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
70 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信