Academic pathways: The role of engagement as a mediator in the decision to drop out or stay at university

Celia Galve-González, Ana B. Bernardo, José Carlos Núñez
{"title":"Academic pathways: The role of engagement as a mediator in the decision to drop out or stay at university","authors":"Celia Galve-González,&nbsp;Ana B. Bernardo,&nbsp;José Carlos Núñez","doi":"10.1016/j.psicoe.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study of university dropout has significantly advanced following the introduction of interactionist theoretical models. However, these models need to be updated based on the current context and new variables that have recently become more important, such as the use of self-regulation strategies (SRL) and academic engagement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyse the extent to which academic engagement mediates the relationship between social integration, academic satisfaction, expectations, and the use of SRL. From a sample of 1177 university students (<em>Mean age</em> = 19.26, <em>SD</em> = 2.97, 79.7% women) academic engagement was found to act as a total mediator in the relationship between independent variables and the use of SRL in models of the intention to drop out of the degree course and university. However, in the models of intention to remain, partial mediation was seen in the effect of social integration and satisfaction, with total mediation only for expectations through the vigour component of engagement. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of student persistence at university.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101103,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","volume":"29 2","pages":"Pages 130-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380524000078/pdfft?md5=34f5e509d5af480072238884abda5800&pid=1-s2.0-S2530380524000078-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530380524000078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of university dropout has significantly advanced following the introduction of interactionist theoretical models. However, these models need to be updated based on the current context and new variables that have recently become more important, such as the use of self-regulation strategies (SRL) and academic engagement. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyse the extent to which academic engagement mediates the relationship between social integration, academic satisfaction, expectations, and the use of SRL. From a sample of 1177 university students (Mean age = 19.26, SD = 2.97, 79.7% women) academic engagement was found to act as a total mediator in the relationship between independent variables and the use of SRL in models of the intention to drop out of the degree course and university. However, in the models of intention to remain, partial mediation was seen in the effect of social integration and satisfaction, with total mediation only for expectations through the vigour component of engagement. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the phenomenon of student persistence at university.

学术途径:参与在决定退学还是留在大学中的中介作用
在引入互动主义理论模型之后,对大学辍学的研究取得了重大进展。然而,这些模型需要根据当前的背景和最近变得更加重要的新变量(如自我调节策略(SRL)的使用和学术参与)进行更新。因此,本研究旨在分析学业参与在多大程度上调节了社会融合、学业满意度、期望和自律学习策略的使用之间的关系。在对 1177 名大学生(平均年龄 = 19.26,标准差 = 2.97,79.7% 为女性)的抽样调查中发现,在学位课程和大学退学意向模型中,学术参与在自变量与 SRL 使用之间的关系中起着完全中介的作用。然而,在留校意向模型中,社会融合和满意度的影响产生了部分中介作用,只有参与的活力部分对期望产生了完全中介作用。这些发现有助于加深对大学学生坚持学习现象的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信