Combined Endo-Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS) for the management of complex colorectal lesions

IF 0.4 Q4 SURGERY
Brian Williams MD, Sang W. Lee MD
{"title":"Combined Endo-Laparoscopic Surgery (CELS) for the management of complex colorectal lesions","authors":"Brian Williams MD,&nbsp;Sang W. Lee MD","doi":"10.1016/j.scrs.2024.101022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Detection of colon polyps is common and is expected in 20–30 % of screening colonoscopies. As the number of colonoscopies performed increases, the detection of advanced and difficult to resect polyps will also rise. These polyps tend to be larger, greater than 2 cm, have flat morphology, and are in difficult anatomic locations behind haustral folds or at sharp flexures of the colon. Advanced endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are useful to remove these polyps. However, many polyps remain unresectable with these techniques. Combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) has shown to be an effective technique to facilitate safe removal of complex polyps. CELS encompasses a variety of techniques including laparoscopic assisted ESD/EMR and laparo-endoscopic full thickness excisions (FLEX). Success rate of CELS ranges from 70 to 100 %, with less than 5 % conversion to colectomy. Perioperative outcomes boast shorter hospital length of stay, with low rates of serious post-op complications when compared to colectomy. Malignancy rate after CELS in appropriately selected patients is low, ranging from 1.6 %-10 % of cases. Polyp recurrence rate after CELS is also low, usually less than 10 %. Use of CELS for early-stage cancers remains controversial but maybe adequate in appropriately selected patients. Further evaluation and long-term studies are needed to study its efficacy in cases of known cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide recommendations for use of CELS techniques, appropriate indications, describe technical tips, and review potential future applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55956,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 101022"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043148924000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Detection of colon polyps is common and is expected in 20–30 % of screening colonoscopies. As the number of colonoscopies performed increases, the detection of advanced and difficult to resect polyps will also rise. These polyps tend to be larger, greater than 2 cm, have flat morphology, and are in difficult anatomic locations behind haustral folds or at sharp flexures of the colon. Advanced endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are useful to remove these polyps. However, many polyps remain unresectable with these techniques. Combined endoscopic laparoscopic surgery (CELS) has shown to be an effective technique to facilitate safe removal of complex polyps. CELS encompasses a variety of techniques including laparoscopic assisted ESD/EMR and laparo-endoscopic full thickness excisions (FLEX). Success rate of CELS ranges from 70 to 100 %, with less than 5 % conversion to colectomy. Perioperative outcomes boast shorter hospital length of stay, with low rates of serious post-op complications when compared to colectomy. Malignancy rate after CELS in appropriately selected patients is low, ranging from 1.6 %-10 % of cases. Polyp recurrence rate after CELS is also low, usually less than 10 %. Use of CELS for early-stage cancers remains controversial but maybe adequate in appropriately selected patients. Further evaluation and long-term studies are needed to study its efficacy in cases of known cancer. The purpose of this review is to provide recommendations for use of CELS techniques, appropriate indications, describe technical tips, and review potential future applications.

联合内镜-腹腔镜手术(CELS)治疗复杂结肠直肠病变
结肠息肉的发现很常见,预计在 20-30% 的结肠镜筛查中会发现。随着结肠镜检查次数的增加,晚期和难以切除的息肉检出率也会上升。这些息肉往往较大,超过 2 厘米,形态扁平,位于肛门皱襞后或结肠急弯处,解剖位置困难。先进的内镜技术,如内镜下粘膜切除术(EMR)和内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)可用于切除这些息肉。然而,许多息肉仍然无法通过这些技术切除。内镜腹腔镜联合手术(CELS)已被证明是一种有效的技术,有助于安全切除复杂的息肉。CELS 包含多种技术,包括腹腔镜辅助 ESD/EMR 和腹腔内镜全厚切除术(FLEX)。CELS的成功率在70%到100%之间,只有不到5%的患者会转为结肠切除术。与结肠切除术相比,围手术期住院时间短,术后严重并发症发生率低。经过适当选择的患者接受 CELS 治疗后,恶性肿瘤发生率较低,为 1.6%-10%。CELS 术后的息肉复发率也很低,通常低于 10%。对早期癌症使用 CELS 仍有争议,但对于经过适当选择的患者来说,也许足够了。对已知癌症病例的疗效还需要进一步评估和长期研究。本综述旨在为 CELS 技术的使用、适当的适应症提供建议,介绍技术诀窍,并对未来可能的应用进行回顾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery offers a comprehensive and coordinated review of a single, timely topic related to the diagnosis and treatment of proctologic diseases. Each issue is an organized compendium of practical information that serves as a lasting reference for colorectal surgeons, general surgeons, surgeons in training and their colleagues in medicine with an interest in colorectal disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信