{"title":"Leading the Moon to Mars Program: James Bridenstine as NASA administrator 2018–2021","authors":"W. Henry Lambright","doi":"10.1016/j.spacepol.2024.101634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large-scale, long-term scientific and technological programs face many hurdles and barriers on the way from initiation to completion. This is especially true for huge-multi-billion space endeavors, such as Artemis, NASA's Moon to Mars venture. Such programs traverse a number of presidencies and congresses. Among the most critical factors in program success or failure is the performance of NASA Administrators. While typically in office only part of the time the program endures, their tenures can be pivotal. Consider the case of James Bridenstine who served in the tumultuous time of Donald Trump. His record illuminates how a NASA Administrator with a political style can maneuver to a program's advantage, often in spite of environmental turmoil. While the full story of Artemis is yet to be written, it seems clear that Bridenstine, overall, left the program with a more secure political momentum than when he arrived. While he could not achieve all he wished, especially internally, he set Artemis on a sufficiently sound trajectory that his successor, under a different president of the opposite party, could maintain and build on Bridenstine's legacy. This positive hand-off was largely unanticipated since Bridenstine came to office with low expectations. His actions to secure the Moon to Mars program thus merits reflection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45924,"journal":{"name":"Space Policy","volume":"68 ","pages":"Article 101634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265964624000250","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Large-scale, long-term scientific and technological programs face many hurdles and barriers on the way from initiation to completion. This is especially true for huge-multi-billion space endeavors, such as Artemis, NASA's Moon to Mars venture. Such programs traverse a number of presidencies and congresses. Among the most critical factors in program success or failure is the performance of NASA Administrators. While typically in office only part of the time the program endures, their tenures can be pivotal. Consider the case of James Bridenstine who served in the tumultuous time of Donald Trump. His record illuminates how a NASA Administrator with a political style can maneuver to a program's advantage, often in spite of environmental turmoil. While the full story of Artemis is yet to be written, it seems clear that Bridenstine, overall, left the program with a more secure political momentum than when he arrived. While he could not achieve all he wished, especially internally, he set Artemis on a sufficiently sound trajectory that his successor, under a different president of the opposite party, could maintain and build on Bridenstine's legacy. This positive hand-off was largely unanticipated since Bridenstine came to office with low expectations. His actions to secure the Moon to Mars program thus merits reflection.
大规模、长期的科技项目从启动到完成的过程中会遇到许多障碍和壁垒。对于耗资数十亿美元的大型太空项目来说更是如此,比如美国国家航空航天局(NASA)的 "阿耳特弥斯"(Artemis)月球到火星计划。这些项目历经多届总统和国会。项目成败的最关键因素之一是 NASA 管理人员的表现。虽然他们的任期通常只占项目持续时间的一部分,但他们的表现却至关重要。以詹姆斯-布里登斯廷(James Bridenstine)为例,他在唐纳德-特朗普(Donald Trump)的动荡时期任职。他的记录说明了一个具有政治风格的 NASA 管理员是如何在环境动荡的情况下为项目带来优势的。虽然阿耳特弥斯的完整故事还没有写完,但总的来说,布里登斯廷离开项目时的政治势头显然比他上任时更加稳固。虽然布里登斯廷未能如愿,尤其是在内部,但他为阿特米斯设定了足够稳健的发展轨迹,以至于他的继任者在不同党派总统的领导下,能够保持并发扬布里登斯廷的传统。这种积极的交接在很大程度上是始料未及的,因为布里登斯廷上任时的期望值并不高。因此,他为确保 "从月球到火星 "计划所采取的行动值得反思。
期刊介绍:
Space Policy is an international, interdisciplinary journal which draws on the fields of international relations, economics, history, aerospace studies, security studies, development studies, political science and ethics to provide discussion and analysis of space activities in their political, economic, industrial, legal, cultural and social contexts. Alongside full-length papers, which are subject to a double-blind peer review system, the journal publishes opinion pieces, case studies and short reports and, in so doing, it aims to provide a forum for the exchange of ideas and opinions and a means by which authors can alert policy makers and international organizations to their views. Space Policy is also a journal of record, reproducing, in whole or part, official documents such as treaties, space agency plans or government reports relevant to the space community. Views expressed in the journal are not necessarily those of the editors or members of the editorial board.