The prevalence of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities; a systematic review and meta-analysis

{"title":"The prevalence of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities; a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dscb.2024.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Bruxism is a repetitive masticatory muscle activity that may cause substantial morbidity and reduce the quality of life in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Assessment methods most commonly used were caregiver reporting and dental examination, This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and to describe the currently used assessment methods for bruxism in this population.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using a multi-component search strategy. We used a random effects model to calculate the prevalence and 95 % confidence intervals for each study, for all studies combined, and specifically for Rett syndrome (RS), cerebral palsy (CP), Down syndrome (DS), and “other disorders (primarily Angelman syndrome and Prader–Willi syndrome).”</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence for the entire group based on a random effects model was found to be 49 % (95 %CI 41–57 %) with high heterogeneity (<em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 93 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), for RS 74 % (95 %CI 53–88 %, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 84 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), CP 48 % (95 %CI 38–57 %, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 86 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), DS 40 % (95 %CI 33–47 %, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 60 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) and “other disorders” 40 % (95 %CI 18–67 %, <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> = 98 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). The group prevalences were not equal, indicating a significant difference (<em>P</em>-value = 0.03), with a notably higher likelihood of RS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We observed a five-fold increased likelihood of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. The disorder with the highest prevalence was Rett syndrome, with a seven-fold increased likelihood of bruxism. The increased likelihood of bruxism in this vulnerable group of children demands clinicians pay heed to this substantial morbidity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72447,"journal":{"name":"Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666459324000167/pdfft?md5=3374a6d6a2c82dde3d86517156ef617c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666459324000167-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666459324000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Bruxism is a repetitive masticatory muscle activity that may cause substantial morbidity and reduce the quality of life in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Assessment methods most commonly used were caregiver reporting and dental examination, This systematic review with meta-analysis aims to determine the prevalence of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and to describe the currently used assessment methods for bruxism in this population.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using a multi-component search strategy. We used a random effects model to calculate the prevalence and 95 % confidence intervals for each study, for all studies combined, and specifically for Rett syndrome (RS), cerebral palsy (CP), Down syndrome (DS), and “other disorders (primarily Angelman syndrome and Prader–Willi syndrome).”

Results

The prevalence for the entire group based on a random effects model was found to be 49 % (95 %CI 41–57 %) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 93 %, p < 0.01), for RS 74 % (95 %CI 53–88 %, I2 = 84 %, p < 0.01), CP 48 % (95 %CI 38–57 %, I2 = 86 %, p < 0.01), DS 40 % (95 %CI 33–47 %, I2 = 60 %, p < 0.01) and “other disorders” 40 % (95 %CI 18–67 %, I2 = 98 %, p < 0.01). The group prevalences were not equal, indicating a significant difference (P-value = 0.03), with a notably higher likelihood of RS.

Conclusion

We observed a five-fold increased likelihood of bruxism in children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. The disorder with the highest prevalence was Rett syndrome, with a seven-fold increased likelihood of bruxism. The increased likelihood of bruxism in this vulnerable group of children demands clinicians pay heed to this substantial morbidity.

严重智力障碍和多重残疾儿童磨牙症的患病率;系统回顾和荟萃分析
导言磨牙症是一种重复性咀嚼肌活动,可能会导致严重智力障碍和多重残疾儿童的大量发病并降低其生活质量。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定磨牙症在深度智障和多重残疾儿童中的患病率,并描述目前在该人群中使用的磨牙症评估方法。我们使用随机效应模型计算了每项研究的患病率和 95% 的置信区间,以及所有研究的总和,特别是针对雷特综合征 (RS)、脑瘫 (CP)、唐氏综合征 (DS) 和 "其他疾病(主要是安杰尔曼综合征和普拉德-威利综合征)"的患病率和 95% 的置信区间。"结果根据随机效应模型,发现整个群体的患病率为 49 %(95 %CI 41-57%),异质性很高(I2 = 93 %,p <0.01),RS 为 74 %(95 %CI 53-88%,I2 = 84 %,p <0.01),CP 为 48 %(95 %CI 53-88%,I2 = 84 %,p <0.01),唐氏综合症为 48 %(95 %CI 41-57%,p <0.01)。01)、CP 48 %(95 %CI 38-57 %,I2 = 86 %,p <0.01)、DS 40 %(95 %CI 33-47 %,I2 = 60 %,p <0.01)和 "其他障碍 "40 %(95 %CI 18-67 %,I2 = 98 %,p <0.01)。各组患病率不等,显示出显著差异(P 值 = 0.03),RS 的患病率明显更高。发病率最高的疾病是雷特综合症,出现磨牙症的可能性增加了七倍。在这一弱势儿童群体中,磨牙症发生的可能性增加,这要求临床医生关注这一严重的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Brain disorders (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信