A physical model study on the hydraulic performances of vertical breakwaters with retreated wave walls

Abstract

This paper describes a 2D physical model study on the hydraulic performances of composite vertical breakwaters with retreated wave walls. The research is an expansion of a previous experimental study by the same Authors: a very large number of experiments, in the order of 2,000, have been carried out by exploring and varying a wide range of wave and geometrical parameters of the structure, to investigate their effect and importance. In order to make feasible the execution of this large number of tests, a small-scale wave flume was used and regular wave conditions were reproduced. The influence of the wave wall retreat has been investigated in terms of wave-induced forces, reflection coefficients and wave overtopping discharges, comparing the hydraulic performances of structures with retreated walls with those of a flushed wall configuration under the same wave conditions. The large number of experiments allowed to formulate a detailed description of the complex phenomena at hand, providing statistical indicators that can be used as guidelines for preliminary design purposes of such structures, quantifying the relevant sources of uncertainty. The analysis confirmed and extended the previous findings and indicates that, on average, the hydraulic performances of structures with retreated crown wall vary significantly from those of flushed wall configurations. Specifically: (I) the forces acting on the wave wall increase of a factor up to 1.5, due to the occurrence of impulsive loads; (II) the forces acting on the caisson trunk decrease of a factor up to 0.91; (III) the global forces can decrease reaching a minimum reduction factor of 0.87, although some dangerous exceptions, in which equal or larger loads, than those occurring for standard flushed wall configuration, have been registered; (IV) the reflection coefficients decrease of a factor up to 0.83; (V) the wave overtopping discharges increase up to 2.55 times those with flushed walls.