A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BARRON'S BANDING VERSUS SCLEROTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS

Manas Mukul Mandal, Saptarshi Poddar
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BARRON'S BANDING VERSUS SCLEROTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HAEMORRHOIDS","authors":"Manas Mukul Mandal, Saptarshi Poddar","doi":"10.36106/ijar/1703967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Haemorrhoid poses a surgical challenge in the anorectal region causing considerable discomfort and psychological\ndistress to the patient. With the advent of non-surgical interventions, such as infrared coagulation and bipolar diathermy,\nthe frequency of haemorrhoidectomies has declined. This study aims to compare the efcacy of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation in\nmanaging haemorrhoids, focusing on post-operative complications and recurrence. Over one and half years, 100 haemorrhoid patients aged 19 to\n66 years were enrolled in this study from a peripheral medical college in West Bengal, India. Patients underwent either Barron's banding or\nsclerotherapy with 5% phenol in olive oil. Post-operative outcomes were addressed at intervals, including pain, bleeding and infection at one\nweek, four weeks and six months. Results revealed a signicant reduction in post-operative pain in patients treated with Barron's band ligation\ncompared to sclerotherapy (p<0.003 at one week and p<0.001 at one month). Additionally, fewer cases of wound infection were observed in the\nbanding group. Recurrence rates were signicantly higher in the sclerotherapy group at six months (p=0.03).","PeriodicalId":13502,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of applied research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of applied research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/1703967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Haemorrhoid poses a surgical challenge in the anorectal region causing considerable discomfort and psychological distress to the patient. With the advent of non-surgical interventions, such as infrared coagulation and bipolar diathermy, the frequency of haemorrhoidectomies has declined. This study aims to compare the efcacy of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation in managing haemorrhoids, focusing on post-operative complications and recurrence. Over one and half years, 100 haemorrhoid patients aged 19 to 66 years were enrolled in this study from a peripheral medical college in West Bengal, India. Patients underwent either Barron's banding or sclerotherapy with 5% phenol in olive oil. Post-operative outcomes were addressed at intervals, including pain, bleeding and infection at one week, four weeks and six months. Results revealed a signicant reduction in post-operative pain in patients treated with Barron's band ligation compared to sclerotherapy (p<0.003 at one week and p<0.001 at one month). Additionally, fewer cases of wound infection were observed in the banding group. Recurrence rates were signicantly higher in the sclerotherapy group at six months (p=0.03).
治疗痔疮的巴氏扎带疗法与硬化剂注射疗法的比较研究
痔疮是肛门直肠部位的外科难题,会给患者带来相当大的不适和心理压力。随着红外线凝固疗法和双极透热疗法等非手术疗法的出现,痔切除术的频率有所下降。本研究旨在比较硬化剂治疗和橡皮筋结扎在治疗痔疮方面的疗,重点关注术后并发症和复发情况。在一年半的时间里,来自印度西孟加拉邦一所外围医学院的 100 名 19 至 66 岁的痔疮患者参加了这项研究。患者接受了巴氏环扎术或在橄榄油中加入 5%苯酚的硬化剂治疗。每隔一周、四周和六个月对术后效果进行评估,包括疼痛、出血和感染。结果显示,与硬化剂治疗相比,使用巴氏结扎法的患者术后疼痛明显减轻(一周时 p<0.003,一个月时 p<0.001)。此外,结扎组的伤口感染病例也较少。六个月后,硬化剂注射组的复发率明显(p=0.03)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信