Provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice in autism: a mini-review

Elizabeth A. DeLucia, Samantha M. Harden, Angela Scarpa
{"title":"Provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice in autism: a mini-review","authors":"Elizabeth A. DeLucia, Samantha M. Harden, Angela Scarpa","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2024.1363532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many established evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autistic youth which facilitate wellbeing and skill development across a range of domains. However, individuals on the autism spectrum are consistently underserved in mental health settings, limiting their access to these EBPs. Positive provider attitudes toward EBPs may increase their uptake or use. The current mini-review seeks to synthesize the literature regarding attitudes toward EBPs among providers working with autistic youth across a variety of settings (i.e., school, early intervention, and general mental health). Fifteen quantitative studies were included. The majority of studies (n = 13, 87%) utilized the Evidence Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) or a variation of this scale. Attitudes toward EBPs were primarily used as a correlate or covariate, although some studies reported descriptive statistics of provider attitudes. When available, the reported results suggest that attitudes toward EBPs are moderately positive at baseline, although they vary between provider types. Two studies (13%) examined change in attitudes toward EBPs and suggested that they may be responsive to intervention. However, findings were mixed as to whether attitudes toward EBPs are predictive of EBP use/uptake. Implications and future directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2024.1363532","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are many established evidence-based practices (EBPs) for autistic youth which facilitate wellbeing and skill development across a range of domains. However, individuals on the autism spectrum are consistently underserved in mental health settings, limiting their access to these EBPs. Positive provider attitudes toward EBPs may increase their uptake or use. The current mini-review seeks to synthesize the literature regarding attitudes toward EBPs among providers working with autistic youth across a variety of settings (i.e., school, early intervention, and general mental health). Fifteen quantitative studies were included. The majority of studies (n = 13, 87%) utilized the Evidence Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS) or a variation of this scale. Attitudes toward EBPs were primarily used as a correlate or covariate, although some studies reported descriptive statistics of provider attitudes. When available, the reported results suggest that attitudes toward EBPs are moderately positive at baseline, although they vary between provider types. Two studies (13%) examined change in attitudes toward EBPs and suggested that they may be responsive to intervention. However, findings were mixed as to whether attitudes toward EBPs are predictive of EBP use/uptake. Implications and future directions are discussed.
医疗服务提供者对自闭症循证实践的态度:微型综述
针对自闭症青少年有许多成熟的循证疗法(EBPs),这些疗法可以促进他们在各个领域的健康和技能发展。然而,自闭症谱系中的个体在心理健康环境中一直得不到充分的服务,限制了他们获得这些 EBPs 的机会。提供者对 EBPs 的积极态度可能会增加他们对 EBPs 的吸收或使用。本微型综述旨在综合各种环境(即学校、早期干预和一般心理健康)下自闭症青少年服务提供者对 EBPs 的态度方面的文献。其中包括 15 项定量研究。大多数研究(n = 13,87%)采用了循证实践态度量表(EBPAS)或该量表的变体。对 EBPs 的态度主要用作相关因素或协变量,尽管有些研究报告了提供者态度的描述性统计。报告的结果表明,尽管不同类型的医疗服务提供者对 EBPs 的态度各不相同,但在基线时对 EBPs 的态度都比较积极。有两项研究(13%)考察了对 EBPs 态度的变化,并认为它们可能会对干预做出反应。然而,关于对 EBPs 的态度是否能预测 EBP 的使用/吸收,研究结果不一。本文讨论了影响和未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信