Whey protein fouling on polymeric heat exchangers

IF 2.8 Q2 THERMODYNAMICS
Heat Transfer Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1002/htj.23070
Philipp Pelz, Jonas Noß, Erik von Harbou, Hans-Jörg Bart
{"title":"Whey protein fouling on polymeric heat exchangers","authors":"Philipp Pelz,&nbsp;Jonas Noß,&nbsp;Erik von Harbou,&nbsp;Hans-Jörg Bart","doi":"10.1002/htj.23070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The fouling behavior of whey protein concentrate (WPC) in food-grade polyether ether ketone (PEEK) heat exchangers was compared to benchmark stainless steel (SS) to evaluate if fouling can be better mitigated by using PEEK. No research has been conducted on WPC fouling behavior of PEEK at WPC concentrations of 2–6 g/L and heat flux densities of 45–55 kW/m<sup>2</sup>. It was found that PEEK materials led to a reduction in heat resistance of up to 40%. At WPC concentrations of 6 g/L, a fouling factor of 0.9 m<sup>2</sup> K/kW was measured for PEEK compared to 1.6 m<sup>2</sup> K/kW for SS. Despite a constant heat flux, fouling curves for PEEK showed an asymptotic behavior, whereas linear fouling was observed for SS. To achieve a comparable heat resistance between PEEK and SS heat exchangers, the operating time could be extended by 9 h when using PEEK materials. Investigations of the deposit mass showed that even though the heat transfer resistance is limited on PEEK, fouling continued to grow at a decreased rate. It was found that the fluid started to evaporate underneath the fouling layer, which led to a partial detachment of the fouling layer and therefore mitigated the heat resistance effects of fouling. To test whether these results are transferable to larger setups, experiments on a scale-up apparatus were conducted. A very similar behavior was qualitatively observed; however, measured deposition deviated on average by 18%. PEEK surfaces also showed great promise regarding cleanability, with fouling layers detaching completely after drying for 10 min and restarting the process. This restored the heat transfer coefficient to its clean state. A cleaning in place therefore seems feasible. In contrast, fouling layers on SS did not detach through drying and had to be chemically cleaned to restore its heat transfer capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":44939,"journal":{"name":"Heat Transfer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/htj.23070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heat Transfer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/htj.23070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fouling behavior of whey protein concentrate (WPC) in food-grade polyether ether ketone (PEEK) heat exchangers was compared to benchmark stainless steel (SS) to evaluate if fouling can be better mitigated by using PEEK. No research has been conducted on WPC fouling behavior of PEEK at WPC concentrations of 2–6 g/L and heat flux densities of 45–55 kW/m2. It was found that PEEK materials led to a reduction in heat resistance of up to 40%. At WPC concentrations of 6 g/L, a fouling factor of 0.9 m2 K/kW was measured for PEEK compared to 1.6 m2 K/kW for SS. Despite a constant heat flux, fouling curves for PEEK showed an asymptotic behavior, whereas linear fouling was observed for SS. To achieve a comparable heat resistance between PEEK and SS heat exchangers, the operating time could be extended by 9 h when using PEEK materials. Investigations of the deposit mass showed that even though the heat transfer resistance is limited on PEEK, fouling continued to grow at a decreased rate. It was found that the fluid started to evaporate underneath the fouling layer, which led to a partial detachment of the fouling layer and therefore mitigated the heat resistance effects of fouling. To test whether these results are transferable to larger setups, experiments on a scale-up apparatus were conducted. A very similar behavior was qualitatively observed; however, measured deposition deviated on average by 18%. PEEK surfaces also showed great promise regarding cleanability, with fouling layers detaching completely after drying for 10 min and restarting the process. This restored the heat transfer coefficient to its clean state. A cleaning in place therefore seems feasible. In contrast, fouling layers on SS did not detach through drying and had to be chemically cleaned to restore its heat transfer capacity.

Abstract Image

聚合物热交换器上的乳清蛋白污垢
将食品级聚醚醚酮(PEEK)热交换器中乳清浓缩蛋白(WPC)的污垢行为与基准不锈钢(SS)进行了比较,以评估使用 PEEK 是否能更好地减轻污垢。在 WPC 浓度为 2-6 g/L 和热流密度为 45-55 kW/m2 的条件下,尚未对 PEEK 的 WPC 结垢行为进行研究。研究发现,PEEK 材料导致耐热性降低达 40%。在 WPC 浓度为 6 g/L 时,测得 PEEK 的污垢系数为 0.9 m2 K/kW,而 SS 的污垢系数为 1.6 m2 K/kW。尽管热通量恒定,但 PEEK 的污垢曲线显示出渐近行为,而 SS 则显示出线性污垢。为了使 PEEK 和 SS 热交换器的耐热性相当,使用 PEEK 材料时,运行时间可延长 9 小时。对沉积物质量的调查表明,尽管 PEEK 材料的热传导阻力有限,但污垢仍在以较低的速度增长。研究发现,液体开始在污垢层下蒸发,导致污垢层部分脱落,从而减轻了污垢对热阻的影响。为了测试这些结果是否可以应用于更大的装置,我们在一个放大装置上进行了实验。观察到了非常相似的定性行为;然而,测量沉积平均偏差为 18%。PEEK 表面在可清洁性方面也表现出很好的前景,在干燥 10 分钟并重新启动工艺后,污垢层会完全脱落。这使传热系数恢复到清洁状态。因此,就地清洁似乎是可行的。相比之下,SS 上的污垢层在干燥后并没有脱离,必须进行化学清洗才能恢复其传热能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer THERMODYNAMICS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
19.40%
发文量
342
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信