Corrigendum to “Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis” [Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research (2024)]
Daniel A. Coulthard Jr, Yoshiyuki Iizuka, Georg F. Zellmer, Raimundo Brahm
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Statistical Perspective on the Petrological Utility of Polyphase Groundmass Compositions Inferred via Defocused Beam Electron Probe Microanalysis” [Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research (2024)]","authors":"Daniel A. Coulthard Jr, Yoshiyuki Iizuka, Georg F. Zellmer, Raimundo Brahm","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to the incorrect speciation of iron during thermometry modelling, Coulthard <i>et al</i>. (2024) produced an incorrect olivine-liquid equilibrium diagram, which failed to identify multiple potential equilibrium olivine-melt pairs. With the new pairs identified here, the temperatures inferred from olivine-groundmass pairs move closer in temperature space to those inferred from olivine-glass pairs. Additionally, it is recognised that the most significant difference between these thermometry data is due to differences in inferred melt water mass fraction. If a mean value of water is used for all thermometry, the mean temperatures calculated for olivine-glass and olivine-groundmass pairs converge to within 10 °C of one another. This indicates that groundmass compositions inferred via the defocused beam analysis of a polyphase groundmass may reproduce enough information to confidently perform olivine-melt thermometry despite the glass and groundmass data representing significantly different compositions in multivariate space.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 2","pages":"359-362"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to the incorrect speciation of iron during thermometry modelling, Coulthard et al. (2024) produced an incorrect olivine-liquid equilibrium diagram, which failed to identify multiple potential equilibrium olivine-melt pairs. With the new pairs identified here, the temperatures inferred from olivine-groundmass pairs move closer in temperature space to those inferred from olivine-glass pairs. Additionally, it is recognised that the most significant difference between these thermometry data is due to differences in inferred melt water mass fraction. If a mean value of water is used for all thermometry, the mean temperatures calculated for olivine-glass and olivine-groundmass pairs converge to within 10 °C of one another. This indicates that groundmass compositions inferred via the defocused beam analysis of a polyphase groundmass may reproduce enough information to confidently perform olivine-melt thermometry despite the glass and groundmass data representing significantly different compositions in multivariate space.
期刊介绍:
Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.