Monte Carlo simulation study on the reliability of concrete-filled HSS beam-column design provisions

IF 1.1 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Sadaf Rahbarimanesh, K. Tousignant
{"title":"Monte Carlo simulation study on the reliability of concrete-filled HSS beam-column design provisions","authors":"Sadaf Rahbarimanesh, K. Tousignant","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2023-0199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Revisions were recently proposed to the way in which concrete-filled hollow structural section (HSS) members are handled in CSA S16. These revisions were based on previous research, comparisons to experiments, and a first-order reliability method analysis of existing provisions for compression and flexural members. In this paper, this topic is further expanded by using Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS) to determine the inherent reliability of the previous and new design rules for concrete-filled rectangular hollow section (RHS) and circular hollow section (CHS) beam-columns. A representative set of concrete-filled RHS and CHS members with variations in concrete strength, wall slenderness, effective length, and loading eccentricity are analyzed. Using MCS, the reliability index (β+) of each is determined over a range of live-to-dead load (L/D) ratios. Inherent β+ values are compared to the code-specified target (i.e., β+ = 3.0 per Annex B of CSA S16) and the CSA S16:19 and AISC 360-16 provisions.","PeriodicalId":9414,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2023-0199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Revisions were recently proposed to the way in which concrete-filled hollow structural section (HSS) members are handled in CSA S16. These revisions were based on previous research, comparisons to experiments, and a first-order reliability method analysis of existing provisions for compression and flexural members. In this paper, this topic is further expanded by using Monte Carlo Simulations (MCS) to determine the inherent reliability of the previous and new design rules for concrete-filled rectangular hollow section (RHS) and circular hollow section (CHS) beam-columns. A representative set of concrete-filled RHS and CHS members with variations in concrete strength, wall slenderness, effective length, and loading eccentricity are analyzed. Using MCS, the reliability index (β+) of each is determined over a range of live-to-dead load (L/D) ratios. Inherent β+ values are compared to the code-specified target (i.e., β+ = 3.0 per Annex B of CSA S16) and the CSA S16:19 and AISC 360-16 provisions.
关于混凝土填充高速钢梁柱设计规定可靠性的蒙特卡洛模拟研究
最近,对 CSA S16 中处理混凝土填充空心结构截面 (HSS) 构件的方式提出了修订建议。这些修订基于先前的研究、与实验的比较以及对现有抗压和抗弯构件规定的一阶可靠性方法分析。在本文中,通过使用蒙特卡罗模拟 (MCS) 来确定混凝土填充矩形空心截面 (RHS) 和圆形空心截面 (CHS) 梁柱的旧设计规则和新设计规则的固有可靠性,进一步扩展了这一主题。对一组具有代表性的混凝土填充 RHS 和 CHS 构件进行了分析,这些构件在混凝土强度、墙体细长度、有效长度和加载偏心率方面均存在变化。利用 MCS,在一定的活荷载与死荷载(L/D)比范围内确定了每种构件的可靠性指数(β+)。将固有的 β+ 值与规范指定的目标值(即 CSA S16 附件 B 中的 β+ = 3.0)以及 CSA S16:19 和 AISC 360-16 的规定进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering
Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
14 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering is the official journal of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. It contains articles on environmental engineering, hydrotechnical engineering, structural engineering, construction engineering, engineering mechanics, engineering materials, and history of civil engineering. Contributors include recognized researchers and practitioners in industry, government, and academia. New developments in engineering design and construction are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信