The Impact of Lingual Orthodontics on Gingival and Periodontal Health; A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trial Studies.

Kevin Lenin Lalangui Felicita, Christian Xavier Paredes Heredia, Kiara Samantha Olmedo Bastidas, Pamela Alexandra Criollo Muquinche, Jeovanela Guadalupe Garcia Vergara, Sylvia Maria Palma Calderon
{"title":"The Impact of Lingual Orthodontics on Gingival and Periodontal Health; A Systematic Review of Controlled Clinical Trial Studies.","authors":"Kevin Lenin Lalangui Felicita, Christian Xavier Paredes Heredia, Kiara Samantha Olmedo Bastidas, Pamela Alexandra Criollo Muquinche, Jeovanela Guadalupe Garcia Vergara, Sylvia Maria Palma Calderon","doi":"10.55640/ijmsdh-10-05-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Linguistic orthodontics is a highly successful and visually pleasing treatment method for addressing malocclusions. It possesses a multitude of advantages in addition to potential disadvantages, including speech impairments, mastication restrictions, and oral agitation. Lingual braces can cause gingival hyperplasia and impact the health of the gums and periodontal tissues. This study conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA standards, specifically examining lingual orthodontic treatments that were the subject of randomized controlled trials. The study found that lingual brackets are more advantageous than buccal brackets for flat surfaces. Both types of brackets have been found to be associated with an elevation in plaque retention, gingival irritation, and S. mutans count. Because of an increased demand for adult orthodontic care, there are designed discrete treatment options such as lingual bracket systems. The demand is largely driven by appearance and cosmetics. Apparently, lingual brackets proved to be more efficacious for the prevention of caries on flat surfaces. Additional research is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of lingual orthodontic efficacy and safety compared to its counterpart","PeriodicalId":503011,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","volume":"46 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science and Dental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55640/ijmsdh-10-05-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Linguistic orthodontics is a highly successful and visually pleasing treatment method for addressing malocclusions. It possesses a multitude of advantages in addition to potential disadvantages, including speech impairments, mastication restrictions, and oral agitation. Lingual braces can cause gingival hyperplasia and impact the health of the gums and periodontal tissues. This study conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA standards, specifically examining lingual orthodontic treatments that were the subject of randomized controlled trials. The study found that lingual brackets are more advantageous than buccal brackets for flat surfaces. Both types of brackets have been found to be associated with an elevation in plaque retention, gingival irritation, and S. mutans count. Because of an increased demand for adult orthodontic care, there are designed discrete treatment options such as lingual bracket systems. The demand is largely driven by appearance and cosmetics. Apparently, lingual brackets proved to be more efficacious for the prevention of caries on flat surfaces. Additional research is necessary to gain a comprehensive understanding of lingual orthodontic efficacy and safety compared to its counterpart
舌侧正畸对牙龈和牙周健康的影响;对照临床试验研究的系统性回顾。
语言矫正是一种非常成功且视觉美观的矫治方法,可用于矫治错颌畸形。它有许多优点,但也有潜在的缺点,包括语言障碍、咀嚼限制和口腔躁动。舌侧矫治器会导致牙龈增生,影响牙龈和牙周组织的健康。本研究按照 PRISMA 标准进行了系统性回顾,专门研究了作为随机对照试验主题的舌侧正畸治疗。研究发现,对于平坦的表面,舌侧托槽比颊侧托槽更有优势。研究发现,这两种托槽都与牙菌斑滞留、牙龈刺激和变异杆菌数量的增加有关。由于成人正畸护理需求的增加,设计出了舌侧托槽系统等分立治疗方案。这种需求在很大程度上是由外观和美观驱动的。显然,舌侧托槽被证明对预防平面龋齿更有效。要全面了解舌侧矫治器与舌侧矫治器相比的有效性和安全性,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信