Reorientasi Dikotomis Ilmu Agama dan Umum Melalui Pendekatan Analisis Bibliometrik

Ali Anhar Syi’bul Huda, Hamdi Hamdi, Muhammad Noor Ridani, Abid Nurhuda
{"title":"Reorientasi Dikotomis Ilmu Agama dan Umum Melalui Pendekatan Analisis Bibliometrik","authors":"Ali Anhar Syi’bul Huda, Hamdi Hamdi, Muhammad Noor Ridani, Abid Nurhuda","doi":"10.37329/kamaya.v7i2.3219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a world where technology is rapidly advancing, religion is often overshadowed by the growing emphasis on general science. This has led to a widening gap between religious studies and general science. This research aims to bridge this gap and challenge the dichotomy between religious and general sciences through a bibliometric analysis. Using a bibliometric approach, the study explores existing literature to identify gaps in research. Data was gathered from 500 articles sourced from Google Scholar through the Publish or Perish (PoP) tool, focusing on publications from 2014 to 2024. The analysis utilized VOSViewer for mapping and Microsoft Word for basic analysis. The findings reveal a significant increase in studies addressing the dichotomy between religious and general sciences over the last decade. The majority of publications are from e-journals, with 359 articles, while e-books accounted for 100 publications. The research also identifies seven key researchers in this field, including Hasan Baharun, Bashori, Afiful Ikhwan, Istikomah, Mujibor Rohman & Miftahur Rohman, Tabrani ZA, and Muhamad Khoirul Umam, with each contributing at least three publications, except Mujibor Rohman, who has one. The VOSViewer analysis identified three clusters within the research development: Cluster 1 with eight items, Cluster 2 with six items, and Cluster 3 with five items. The most common keywords found were \"general science,\" \"pesantren,\" and \"Islamic religious education.\" This study highlights the growing interest in bridging religious and general sciences and suggests a need to reorient perspectives to address the imbalance.","PeriodicalId":372927,"journal":{"name":"Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37329/kamaya.v7i2.3219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a world where technology is rapidly advancing, religion is often overshadowed by the growing emphasis on general science. This has led to a widening gap between religious studies and general science. This research aims to bridge this gap and challenge the dichotomy between religious and general sciences through a bibliometric analysis. Using a bibliometric approach, the study explores existing literature to identify gaps in research. Data was gathered from 500 articles sourced from Google Scholar through the Publish or Perish (PoP) tool, focusing on publications from 2014 to 2024. The analysis utilized VOSViewer for mapping and Microsoft Word for basic analysis. The findings reveal a significant increase in studies addressing the dichotomy between religious and general sciences over the last decade. The majority of publications are from e-journals, with 359 articles, while e-books accounted for 100 publications. The research also identifies seven key researchers in this field, including Hasan Baharun, Bashori, Afiful Ikhwan, Istikomah, Mujibor Rohman & Miftahur Rohman, Tabrani ZA, and Muhamad Khoirul Umam, with each contributing at least three publications, except Mujibor Rohman, who has one. The VOSViewer analysis identified three clusters within the research development: Cluster 1 with eight items, Cluster 2 with six items, and Cluster 3 with five items. The most common keywords found were "general science," "pesantren," and "Islamic religious education." This study highlights the growing interest in bridging religious and general sciences and suggests a need to reorient perspectives to address the imbalance.
通过文献计量分析方法重新定位宗教科学和普通科学的二分法
在科技飞速发展的今天,宗教往往被日益重视的普通科学所掩盖。这导致宗教研究与普通科学之间的差距不断扩大。本研究旨在弥合这一差距,并通过文献计量分析挑战宗教科学与普通科学之间的二分法。本研究采用文献计量学方法,探索现有文献,找出研究空白。数据来自通过出版或毁灭(PoP)工具从谷歌学术(Google Scholar)获取的 500 篇文章,重点关注 2014 年至 2024 年的出版物。分析使用 VOSViewer 绘制地图,并使用 Microsoft Word 进行基本分析。研究结果表明,在过去十年中,有关宗教科学和普通科学二分法的研究大幅增加。大多数出版物来自电子期刊,共 359 篇文章,而电子书籍占 100 篇。研究还确定了这一领域的七位主要研究人员,包括 Hasan Baharun、Bashori、Afiful Ikhwan、Istikomah、Mujibor Rohman & Miftahur Rohman、Tabrani ZA 和 Muhamad Khoirul Umam,除 Mujibor Rohman 只有一篇论文外,其余每人至少发表了三篇论文。VOSViewer 分析确定了研究发展中的三个群组:第 1 组有 8 个项目,第 2 组有 6 个项目,第 3 组有 5 个项目。最常见的关键词是 "普通科学"、"长老会 "和 "伊斯兰宗教教育"。这项研究凸显了人们对连接宗教科学和普通科学的日益浓厚的兴趣,并表明有必要调整视角,以解决不平衡问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信