Transitional Justice in Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia in a Comparative Framework

Q3 Social Sciences
Arian Dedej, Ines Stasa, Marco Cilento
{"title":"Transitional Justice in Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia in a Comparative Framework","authors":"Arian Dedej, Ines Stasa, Marco Cilento","doi":"10.36941/jesr-2024-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thesis aims to enhance transitional justice studies with a focus on the Balkan peninsula, by providing a comparative analysis of the extent of transitional justice mechanisms in Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia. With the fall of military dictatorships in Latin America in the 1980s, the breakup of the Soviet Union, and the emergence of new states in the 1990s, the concept of Transitional Justice (TJ) saw a significant rise in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This was further propelled by the fall of the Berlin Wall (1989), the prolonged breakup of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1992) as well as the fall of the communist dictatorship in Albania (1990). The emergence of new states and the state-building processes that followed the political and social changes also brought new challenges and conflicts, although they marked the end of significantly repressive political regimes. Considering that the implementation of TJ has undergone several changes over time and is dependent on the different settings in which it was employed, it is necessary to conduct extensive comparative research to determine the extent to which TJ differs in post-communist and post-conflict nations. The study has developed three main hypotheses: (1) The limited achievement of lustration law in Albania has conditioned the current status of transitional justice; (2) The state-building process has contributed to the evolution of Transitional Justice in Kosovo; (3) The power-sharing process as a TJ pillar in North Macedonia has fueled TJ in the country. By utilizing a mixed methods approach, data was collected through elite interviews, conducted in the three countries with 44 representatives from academia, politics, media, and civil society. To conclude, two hypotheses are fully upheld in terms of the limited achievement of lustration law and its implications with the current status of transitional justice in Albania; and the contribution of state-building in Kosovo to the evolution of transitional justice. The third hypothesis related to the power-sharing process in North Macedonia as a fueling mechanism for the evolution of transitional justice is partially upheld.  \n  \nReceived: 13 February 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024","PeriodicalId":15617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","volume":"235 6‐7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This thesis aims to enhance transitional justice studies with a focus on the Balkan peninsula, by providing a comparative analysis of the extent of transitional justice mechanisms in Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia. With the fall of military dictatorships in Latin America in the 1980s, the breakup of the Soviet Union, and the emergence of new states in the 1990s, the concept of Transitional Justice (TJ) saw a significant rise in the late 1980s and early 1990s. This was further propelled by the fall of the Berlin Wall (1989), the prolonged breakup of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (1992) as well as the fall of the communist dictatorship in Albania (1990). The emergence of new states and the state-building processes that followed the political and social changes also brought new challenges and conflicts, although they marked the end of significantly repressive political regimes. Considering that the implementation of TJ has undergone several changes over time and is dependent on the different settings in which it was employed, it is necessary to conduct extensive comparative research to determine the extent to which TJ differs in post-communist and post-conflict nations. The study has developed three main hypotheses: (1) The limited achievement of lustration law in Albania has conditioned the current status of transitional justice; (2) The state-building process has contributed to the evolution of Transitional Justice in Kosovo; (3) The power-sharing process as a TJ pillar in North Macedonia has fueled TJ in the country. By utilizing a mixed methods approach, data was collected through elite interviews, conducted in the three countries with 44 representatives from academia, politics, media, and civil society. To conclude, two hypotheses are fully upheld in terms of the limited achievement of lustration law and its implications with the current status of transitional justice in Albania; and the contribution of state-building in Kosovo to the evolution of transitional justice. The third hypothesis related to the power-sharing process in North Macedonia as a fueling mechanism for the evolution of transitional justice is partially upheld.    Received: 13 February 2024 / Accepted: 30 April 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024
阿尔巴尼亚、科索沃和北马其顿过渡时期司法的比较框架
本论文旨在通过对阿尔巴尼亚、科索沃和北马其顿过渡时期司法机制的程度进行比较分析,加强以巴尔干半岛为重点的过渡时期司法研究。随着 20 世纪 80 年代拉丁美洲军事独裁政权的垮台、苏联的解体以及 20 世纪 90 年代新国家的崛起,过渡时期司法(TJ)的概念在 20 世纪 80 年代末和 90 年代初显著兴起。柏林墙的倒塌(1989 年)、南斯拉夫社会主义联邦共和国的长期解体(1992 年)以及阿尔巴尼亚共产主义独裁政权的垮台(1990 年)进一步推动了这一概念的发展。新国家的出现以及政治和社会变革之后的国家建设进程也带来了新的挑战和冲突,尽管这标志着具有重大压迫性的政治体制的终结。考虑到随着时间的推移,过渡时期司法的实施经历了若干变化,并取决于其采用的不同环境,因此有必要进行广泛的比较研究,以确定过渡时期司法在共产主义后国家和冲突后国家的不同程度。本研究提出了三个主要假设:(1) 阿尔巴尼亚肃清法的有限成就制约了过渡时期司法的现状;(2) 国家建设进程促进了科索沃过渡时期司法的发展;(3) 作为北马其顿过渡时期司法支柱的权力分享进程推动了该国的过渡时期司法。通过采用混合方法,在这三个国家对来自学术界、政界、媒体和民间社会的 44 名代表进行了精英访谈,收集了数据。最后,在肃清法的有限成就及其对阿尔巴尼亚过渡时期司法现状的影响,以及科索沃国家建设对过渡时期司法演变的贡献方面,有两个假设得到了完全支持。与北马其顿权力分享进程作为过渡时期司法演变的推动机制有关的第三个假设得到了部分支持。 收到:接收日期:2024 年 2 月 13 日 / 接受日期:2024 年 4 月 30 日 / 发表日期:2024 年 4 月 5 日发表日期:2024 年 5 月 5 日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Journal of Educational and Social Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书