A Contrastive Study of Resultative Constructions in Albanian and Other Languages

Q3 Social Sciences
A. Kurani, Anisa Trifoni
{"title":"A Contrastive Study of Resultative Constructions in Albanian and Other Languages","authors":"A. Kurani, Anisa Trifoni","doi":"10.36941/jesr-2024-0072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the last two or three decades, linguists have paid great attention to certain ways and means of expressing result, especially in English and other Germanic languages, but also in Neo-Latin and Slavic languages, as well as in Chinese, Japanese, Korean and the like. As Zhang (2009) notes, resultative constructions have a prominent place in contemporary linguistic studies, because they shed light on the nature of relationship between semantics and syntax. They have been examined not only based on the syntactic composition, but also on the structure of argument and lexical semantics. Formal analysis instruments, as well as functional and cognitive ones have been already used. However, the last word has not yet been said, since there are many other languages where the concept of result and the elements used to express it have not been examined deeply enough. This is especially true for languages spoken outside the Eurasian continent, but also for languages within this area, including Albanian. The following study is focused on different syntactic patterns by which the concept of result is codified in several languages belonging to different families, with the belief that this analysis will help to determine the position of Albanian language amidst these languages concerning resultative constructions in general. \n  \nReceived: 21 March 2024 / Accepted: 28 May 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024","PeriodicalId":15617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","volume":"252 3‐5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Social Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2024-0072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the last two or three decades, linguists have paid great attention to certain ways and means of expressing result, especially in English and other Germanic languages, but also in Neo-Latin and Slavic languages, as well as in Chinese, Japanese, Korean and the like. As Zhang (2009) notes, resultative constructions have a prominent place in contemporary linguistic studies, because they shed light on the nature of relationship between semantics and syntax. They have been examined not only based on the syntactic composition, but also on the structure of argument and lexical semantics. Formal analysis instruments, as well as functional and cognitive ones have been already used. However, the last word has not yet been said, since there are many other languages where the concept of result and the elements used to express it have not been examined deeply enough. This is especially true for languages spoken outside the Eurasian continent, but also for languages within this area, including Albanian. The following study is focused on different syntactic patterns by which the concept of result is codified in several languages belonging to different families, with the belief that this analysis will help to determine the position of Albanian language amidst these languages concerning resultative constructions in general.   Received: 21 March 2024 / Accepted: 28 May 2024 / Published: 5 May 2024
阿尔巴尼亚语和其他语言中结果式结构的对比研究
近二三十年来,语言学家们对某些表达结果的方法和手段给予了极大的关注,尤其是在英语和其他日耳曼语言中,同时也在新拉丁语系和斯拉夫语系,以及汉语、日语、韩语等语言中。正如 Zhang(2009)所指出的,结果结构在当代语言学研究中占有重要地位,因为它们揭示了语义和句法之间关系的本质。对它们的研究不仅基于句法构成,也基于论证结构和词汇语义。已经使用了形式分析工具以及功能和认知分析工具。然而,最后的话还没有说完,因为还有许多语言对结果的概念和用于表达结果的要素的研究还不够深入。欧亚大陆以外的语言尤其如此,但这一地区内的语言也是如此,包括阿尔巴尼亚语。下面的研究主要集中在属于不同语系的几种语言中对结果概念进行编纂的不同句法模式上,相信这一分析将有助于确定阿尔巴尼亚语在这些语言中关于结果结构的总体地位。 收到:接收:2024 年 3 月 21 日 / 接受:2024 年 5 月 28 日 / 发表:2024 年 5 月 5 日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Educational and Social Research
Journal of Educational and Social Research Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书